Tribological Assessment of UHMWPE in the Knee

UHMWPE Biomaterials Handbook

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 381-408

  Haider, Hani ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955274458     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-374721-1.00026-2     Document Type: Chapter

References (87)

1. Walker PS, Haider H Characterizing the motion of total knee replacements in laboratory tests. J Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003, 410:54-68.
2. Shaw JA, Murray MD Knee joint simulator. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1973, 94:15-23.
3. Harding ML, Harding L, Goodfellow JW A preliminary report of a simple rig to aid study of the functional anatomy of the cadaver human knee joint. J Biomech 1977, 10:517-521.
4. Zavatsky AB A kinematic-freedom analysis of a flexed-knee-stance testing rig. J Biomech 1997, 30:277-280.
5. Rovick JS, Reuben JD, Schrager RJ, Walker PS Relation between knee motion and ligament length patterns. J Clin Biomech 1991, 6:213-220.
6. Zachman NJ, Hillbery BM, Kettlekamp DB. Design of a load simulator for the dynamic evaluation of prosthetic knee joints. ASME 1978:78-DET-59.
7. Maletsky LP, Hillberry BM Simulating dynamic activities using a five-axis knee simulator. J Biomech Eng 2005, 127(1):123-133.
8. Maletsky LP, Clary CW, Guess TM, Mane AM, Reeve AN. In vitro simulation of deep knee flexion using static and dynamic machines. Proc. ASME 2008; Summer Bioengineering Conference (SBC2008). Marco Island, Florida, USA.
9. Dürselen L, Cales L, Kiefer H The influence of muscle forces and external loads on cruciate ligament strain. Am J Sports Med 1995, 23(1):129-136.
10. Haider H, Walker PS Measurements of constraint of total knee replacement. J Biomech 2005, 38(2):341-348.
11. Darcy SP, Kilger RHP, Woo SL-Y, Debski RE Estimation of ACL forces by reproducing kinematics between sets of knees, a novel non-invasive methodology. J Biomech 2006, 39(13):2371-2377.
12. Li G, Most E, Sultan PG, Schule S, Zayontz S, Park SE, Rubash HE Knee kinematics with a high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis: an in vitro robotic experimental investigation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004, 86-A(8):1721-1729.
13. Most E, Li G, Sultan PG, Park SE, Rubash HE Kinematic analysis of conventional and high-flexion cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties: an in vitro investigation. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20(4):529-535.
14. Hill MR, Catledge SA, Konovalov V, Clem WC, Chowdhury SA, Etheridge BS, Stanishevsky A, Lemons JE, Vohra YK, Eberhardt AW Preliminary tribological evaluation of nanostructured diamond coatings against ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. J Biomed Mater Res Part B, Appl Biomater 2008, 85B:140-148.
15. Cornwall GB, Bryant JT, Hansson CM The effect of kinematic conditions on the wear of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) in orthopaedic bearing applications. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part H 2000, 215:95-106.
16. Bragdon CR, O'Connor DO, Lowenstein JD, Jasty M, Syniuta WD The importance of multidirectional motion on the wear of polyethylene. Proc Inst Mech Engrs, Part H: J Eng Med 1996, 210(H3):157-165.
17. Muratoglu OK, Bragdon CR, O'Conner DO, Jasty M, Harris WH, Gul R, McGarry F Unified wear model for highly crosslinked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylenes (UHMWPE). J Biomater 1999, 20:1463-1470.
18. Burroughs BR, Blanchet TA Factors affecting the wear of irradiated UHMWPE. Tribol Trans 2001, 44:215-223.
19. Wang A A unified theory of wear for ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene in multi-directional sliding. J Wear 2001, 248:38-47.
20. Hamilton MA, Sucec MC, Fregly BJ, Banks SA, Sawyer WG Quantifying multidirectional sliding motions in total knee replacements. J Tribol 2005, 127:280-286.
21. Standard test method for wear testing of polymeric materials used in total joint prostheses. ASTM Int 2006, ASTM F732-00, West Conshohocken, PA.
22. Gevaert MR, LaBerge M, Gordon JM, DesJardins JD The quantification of physiologically relevant cross shear wear phenomena on orthopaedic bearing materials using a novel wear testing machine. J Tribol 2005, 127(4):740-749.
23. Fisher J, Dowson D, Hamdzah H, Lee HL The effect of sliding velocity on the friction and wear of UHMWPE for use in total artificial joints. J Wear 1994, 175:219-225.
24. Lewis G Contact stress at articular surfaces in total joint replacements. Part II: analytical and numerical methods. Bio-Med Mater Eng 1998, 8:259-278.
25. Walker PS Biomechanics of total knee replacement designs, chapter 15. Basic orthopaedic biomechanics and mechano-biology 2004, 657-702. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins. 3rd ed. V. Mow, R. Huiskes (Eds.).
26. Walker PS, Blunn GW, Lilley PA Wear testing of materials and surface for total knee replacement. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater) 1996, 33:159-175.
27. Sathasivam S, Walker PS, Campbell PA, Rayner K The effect of contact area on wear in relation to fixed bearing and mobile bearing knee replacements. J Biomed Mater Res 2001, 58(3):382-390.
28. Mazzucco D, Spector M Effects of contact area and stress on the volumetric wear of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. J Wear 2003, 254(5-6):514-522.
29. Mazzucco D, Spector M Contact area as a critical determinant in the tribology of metal-on-polyethylene total joint arthroplasty. J Tribol 2006, 128(1):113-121.
30. Saikko V Effect of contact pressure on wear and friction of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene in multidirectional sliding. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part H: J Eng Med 2006, 220(7):723-731.
31. Vassiliou K, Unsworth A Is the wear factor in total joint replacements dependent on the nominal contact stress in ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene contacts?. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part H: J Eng Med 2004, 218:101-107.
32. Bartel DL, Bicknell VL, Wright TM The effect of conformity, thickness and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (A) 1986, 68-A:1041-1052.
33. Lee K-Y, Pienkowski D. Viscoelastic recovery of creep-deformed ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). In: Gsell RA, editor. Chapter in Characterization and properties of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. STP1307-EB ASTM Publications.
34. Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Beynnon BD The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. J Clin Orthop 1998, 356:111-118.
35. Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MAR Tibiofemoral motion 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg (B) 2000, 82B:1189-1195.
36. Blankevoort L, Huiskes R, De Lange A Helical axes of passive knee joint motions. J Biomech 1990, 23:1219-1229.
37. Grood ES, Suntay WJ A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 1983, 105:136-1344.
38. ISO 14243-1. Implants for surgery-wear of total knee-joint prostheses-Part 1: loading and displacement parameters for wear-testing machines with load control and corresponding environmental conditions for test, International Organization for Standardization; 2002.
39. Andriacchi TP, Johnson TS, Hurwitz DE, Natarajan RN Musculosleletal dynamics, locomotion and clinical applications, chapter 3. Basic orthopaedic biomechanics and mechano-biology 2004, 91-121. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins. 3rd ed. V. Mow, R. Huiskes (Eds.).
40. Nordin M, Frankel VH Biomechanics of the knee, chapter 7. Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system 2001, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. 3rd ed. M. Nordin, V.H. Frankel (Eds.).
41. Swanson SAV, Freeman MAR, Heath JC Laboratory tests on total joint replacement prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [B] 1973, 55B:759-773.
42. Dowson D, Jobbins B, O'Kelly J, Wright V A knee joint simulator, chapter 7. Evaluation of artificial hip joints 1977, 79-90. Biological Engineering Society, UK.
43. Dowson D, Gillis BJ, Atkinson JR. Penetration of metallic femoral components into polymeric tibial components observed in a knee joint simulator. American Chemical Society Symposium Series No. 287, Polymer Wear and Its Control; 1985. p. 215-28.
44. Pappas MJ, Buechel FF New Jersey knee simulator. Trans of the 11th Annu Int Biomater Symp 1979, 3:101.
45. Pappas MJ, Buechel FF On the use of a constraint radius femoral component in meniscal bearing knee replacement. J Orthop Rheum 1994, 7:27-29.
46. DiAngelo DJ, Harrington IJ Design of a dynamic multi-purpose joint simulator. Adv Bioeng 1992, 22:107-111. ASME Bioeng Div Publ BED.
47. Walker PS, Hsieh HH Conformity in condylar replacement knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 1977, 59B:222-228.
48. Burgess IC, Kolar M, Cunningham JL, Unsworth A Development of a six station knee wear simulator and preliminary wear results. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part H: J Eng Med 1997, 211:37-47.
49. Haider H, Walker PS, Blunn GW, Perry J, DesJardins J. A four channel force control knee simulator: from concept to production. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Symposium, International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty [ISTA], Marseille, France; 1998. p. 213-14.
50. Walker PS, Blunn GW, Perry JP, Bell CJ, Sathasivam S, Andriacchi TP, Paul JP, Haider H, Campbell PA Methodology for long-term wear testing of total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000, 372:290-301.
51. Walker PS, Blunn GW, Broome DR, Perry J, Watkins A, Sathasivam S, Dewar ME, Paul JP A knee simulating machine for performance evaluation of total knee replacements. J Biomech Tech Note 1997, 30:83-89.
52. Blunn GW, Bell CJ, Walker PS, Chaterjee S, Perry J, Cambell P, Haider H, Paul JP Simulator testing of total knee replacements, chapter 9. Friction, lubrication and wear of artificial joints 2003, 113-125. Professional Engineering Publishing, ISBN 1 86058 363 6. I.M. Hutchings (Ed.).
53. DesJardins JD, Walker PS, Haider H, Perry J The use of a force-controlled dynamic knee simulator to quantify the mechanical performance of total knee replacement designs. J Biomech 2000, 33:1231-1242.
54. Haider H, Walker PS. Analysis and recommendations for the optimum spring configurations for soft tissue restraint in force-control knee simulator testing. Trans Orthop Res Society, 48th Annual Meeting; 2002.
55. Haider H, Walker P, DesJardins J, Blunn G Effects of patient and surgical alignment variables on kinematics in TKR simulation under force-control. J ASTM Int (JAI) 2006, 3(10).
56. ISO 14243-3. Implants for surgery-wear of total knee-joint prostheses-Part 3: loading and displacement parameters for wear-testing machines with displacement control and corresponding environmental conditions for test, International Organization for Standardization; 2004.
57. Mikosz RP, Andriacchi TP, Andersson GBJ Model analysis of factors influencing the prediction of muscle forces at the knee. J Orthop Res 1988, 6:205-214.
58. Morrison JB The mechanics of the knee joint in relation to normal walking. J Biomech 1970, 3:51-61.
59. Johnson TS, Laurent MP, Yao JQ, Gilbertson LN The effect of displacement control input parameters on tibiofemoral prosthetic knee wear. Wear 2001, 250:222-226.
60. Knight LA, Pal S, Coleman JC, Bronson F, Haider H, Levine DL, Taylor M, Rullkoetter PJ Comparison of long-term numerical and experimental total knee replacement wear during simulated gait loading. J Biomech 2007, 40(7):1550-1558.
61. Laz P, Pal S, Halloran J, Petrella J, Rullkoetter PJ Probabilistic finite element prediction of knee wear simulator mechanics. J Biomech 2006, 39(12):2303-2310.
62. Rawlinson JJ, Furman BD, Li S, Wright TM, Bartel DL Retrieval, experimental, and computational assessment of the performance of total knee replacements. J Orthop Res 2006, 24(7):1384-1394.
63. Haider H, Garvin K Rotating platform versus fixed-bearing total knees-an in vitro study of wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466:2677-2685.
64. Taylor SJG, Walker PS, Perry JS, Cannon SR, Woledge R The forces in the distal femur and the knee during walking and other activities measured by telemetry. J Arthroplasty 1998, 13:428-437.
65. Taylor SJG, Walker PS Force and moments telemetered from two distal femoral replacements during various activities. J Biomech 2001, 34:839-848.
66. Taylor WR, Heller MO, Bergmann G, Duda GN Tibio-femoral loading during human gait and stair climbing. J Orthop Res 2004, 22:625-632.
67. D'Lima DD, Patil S, Steklov N, Chien S, Colwell C. In vivo knee moments and shear after total knee arthroplasty. J Biomech 2007, 40:S11-17.
68. Haider H, Sekundiak TD, Garvin KL. Simulation of the spring-based soft tissue restraint in testing knee wear under force control. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mechanics of Biomaterials & Tissues. Hawaii, USA; 2005 December.
69. Fukubayashi T, Torzilli PA, Sherman MF, Warren RF An in-vitro biomechanical evaluation of anterior-posterior motion of the knee. JBJS 1982, 64-A:258-264.
70. Benson LC, DesJardins JD, Harman MK, LaBerge M Effect of stair descent loading on UHMWPE wear in a force-controlled knee simulator. Proc Inst Mech Engrs (Part. H, J Eng Med) 2002, 216(6):409-418.
71. DesJardins JD, Banks SA, Benson LC, Pace T, Laberge M A direct comparison of patient and force-controlled simulator total knee replacement kinematics. J Biomech 2007, 40(15):3458-3466.
72. Haider H, Walker PS, Blunn GW. Are the kinematics of different TKR designs targeted for the same patient the same? Trans Orthop Res Society, 48th Annual Meeting. Dallas, TX; 2002.
73. Verbal communication with Drs. Todd. S. Johnson and Les Gilbertson of Zimmer Inc. between 2001 and 2008.
74. Johnson TS, Andreacchi T, Laurent M. Development of a knee wear test method based on prosthetic in vivo slip velocity profiles. Trans Orthop Res Society, 46th Annual Meeting. FL; 2000.
75. Johnson TS. PhD Thesis. University of Minnesota; 1999.
76. Andriacchi TP, Alexander EJ, Toney MK, Dyrby CO, Sum J A point cluster method for in vivo motion analysis: applied to a study of knee kinematics. J Biomech Eng 1998, 120:743-749.
77. Haider H, Alberts LR, Laurent MP, Johnson TS, Yao J, Gilbertson LN, Walker PS, Neff JR, Garvin KL. Comparison between force-controlled and displacement-controlled in-vitro wear testing on a widely used TKR implant. Trans Orthop Res Society, 48th Annual Meeting. Dallas, TX; 2002 February.
78. Anderson DR, Sweeney DJ, Williams TA. Chapter 8 in Introduction to Statistics, Concepts and Applications. 3rd ed. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co. ISBN: 0-314-02813-7.
79. Taylor JR An introduction to error analysis-the study of uncertainties in physical measurements 1982, University Science Books, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-935702-10-5.
80. ISO 14243-2. Implants for surgery-wear of total knee-joint prostheses-Part 2: methods of measurement, International Organization for Standardization; 2006.
81. Muratoglu OK, Rubash HE, Bragdon CR, Burroughs BR, Huang A, Harris WH Simulated normal gait wear testing of a highly cross-linked polyethylene tibial insert. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(3):435-444.
82. Fisher J, McEwen HMJ, Tipper JL, Jennings LM, Farrar R, Stone MH, Ingham E Wear-simulation analysis of rotating-platform mobile bearing knees. Orthop 2006, 29:36-41.
83. Clarke C, Chan FW, Essner A, Good V, Kaddick C, Lappalainen R, Laurent M, McKellop H, McGarry W, Schroeder D, Selenius M, Shen MC, Ueno M, Wang A, Yao JQ Multi-laboratory simulator studies on effects of serum proteins on PTFE cup wear. J Wear 2001, 250:188-198.
84. Liao YS, Benya PD, McKellop HA Effect of protein lubrication on the wear properties of materials for prosthetic joints. J Biomed Mater Res, Appl Biomater 1999, 48:465-473.
85. Yao JQ, Laurent MP, Johnson TS, Blanchard CR, Crowninshield RD The influences of lubricant and material on polymer/CoCr sliding friction. J Wear 2003, 255:780-784.
86. DesJardins JD, Aurora A, Tanner SL, Pace TB, LaBerge DM Increased total knee arthroplasty ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear using a clinically relevant hyaluronic acid simulator lubricant. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part. H, J Eng Med 2006, 220(5):609-623.
87. Brandt JM, Charron K, Zhao L, Medley JB, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, McCalden, RW. Development of a clinically relevant lubricant for in-vitro wear testing of total knee replacements. Proc. 75th Annual Meeting AAOS, Poster 137;477.