Characterizing the motion of total knee replacements in laboratory tests

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 410, Issue , 2003, Pages 54-68

  Walker, Peter S ^a,b,c,d   Haider, Hani ^b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; FRACTURE FIXATION; HUMAN; IMPLANT; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; JOINT LAXITY; KINEMATICS; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE INSTABILITY; LABORATORY TEST; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 0038405214     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000063599.67412.44     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Biden E, O'Connor J: Experimental Methods Used to Evaluate Knee Ligament Function. In Daniel M, Akeson WH, O'Connor JJ, (eds). Knee Ligaments, Structure, Function, Injury and Repair. New York, Raven Press 135-151, 1990.
2. Black JD, Greenwald AS: Anterior-posterior and medial-lateral stability of non-hinged total knee replacements. Trans Orthop Res Soc 4:96, 1979.
3. Black JD, Matejczyk MB, Greenwald AS, Wilde AS: Rotational characteristics of non-hinged total knee replacements. Trans Orthop Res Soc 2:56, 1977.
4. Blankevoort L, Huiskes R, De Lange A: The envelope of passive knee joint motion. J Biomech 21:705-720, 1988.
5. Blankevoort L, Huiskes R, De Lange A: Helical axes of passive knee joint motions. J Biomech 23:1219-1229, 1990.
6. Blunn GW, Joshi AB, Lilley PA, et al: Polyethylene wear in unicondylar knee prostheses: 106 retrieved Marmor, PCA and St. Georg tibial components compared. Acta Orthop Scand 63:247-255, 1992.
7. Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Beynnon BD: The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop 356:111-118, 1998.
8. DesJardins JD, Walker PS, Haider H, Perry J: The use of a force-controlled dynamic knee simulator to quantify the mechanical performance of total knee replacement designs. J Biomech 33:1231-1242, 2000.
9. Draganich LF, Andriacchi TP, Andersson GBJ: Interaction between intrinsic knee mechanics and the knee extensor mechanism. J Orthop Res 5:539-547, 1987.
10. Fukubayashi T, Torzilli PA, Sherman MF, Warren RF: An in vitro biomechanical evaluation of anteriorposterior motion of the knee: Tibial displacement, rotation, and torque. J Bone Joint Surg 64A:258-264, 1982.
11. Gollehon DL, Torzilli PA, Warren RF: The role of the posterolateral and cruciate ligaments in the stability of the human knee. J Bone Joint Surg 69A:233-242, 1987.
12. Grood ES, Suntay WJ: A joint co-ordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: Application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 105:136-144, 1983.
13. Haider H, Alberts LR, Laurent MP et al: Comparison between force-controlled and displacement controlled in-vitro wear testing on a widely used TKR implant Trans Orthop Res Soc 27:1007, 2002.
14. Haider H, Walker PS: Analysis and recommendations for the optimum spring configurations for soft tissue restraint in force-control knee simulator testing. Trans Orthop Res Soc 27:912, 2002.
15. Haider H, Walker PS, Blunn GW: Are the kinematics of different TKR designs targeted for the same patient the same? Trans Orthop Res Soc 27;965, 2002.
16. Haider H, Walker PS, Blunn GW, Bell CJ. The sensitivity of TKR kinematics to misaligned installation. Trans Orthop Res Soc 26:1097, 2001.
17. Hillberry BM, Schaff JA, Cullom CD, Kettelkamp DB: Laboratory knee simulation: A viable option. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, Washington, DC 149, 1984.
18. Hsieh HH, Walker PS: Stabilizing mechanisms of the loaded and unloaded knee joint. J Bone Joint Surg 58A:87-93, 1976.
19. Iversen BF, Sturup J, Jacobsen K, Andersen J: Implications of muscular defense in testing for the anterior drawer sign in the knee: A stress radiographic investigation. Am J Sports Med 17:409-413, 1989.
20. Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MAR: Tibiofemoral motion 1: The shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg 82B:1189-1195, 2000.
21. Li G, Zayontz S, Most E, et al: Kinematic responses of posterior cruciate retaining and posterior substitute TKAS under muscle loads. Trans Orthop Res Soc 27:967, 2002.
22. Luger E, Sathasivam S, Walker PS: Inherent differences in the laxity and stability between the intact knee and total knee replacements. Knee 4:7-14, 1997.
23. MacWilliams BA, Wilson DR, DesJardins JD, Romero J, Chao YS: Hamstrings cocontraction reduces internal rotation, anterior translation, and anterior cruciate ligament load in weight-bearing flexion. J Orthop Res 17:817-822, 1999.
24. Markolf KL, Bargar WL, Shoemaker SC, Amstutz HC: The role of joint load in knee stability. J Bone Joint Surg 63A:570-585, 1981.
25. Markolf KL, Graff-Radford A, Amstutz HC: In vivo knee stability. J Bone Joint Surg 60A:664-674, 1978.
26. Most E, Li G, Otterberg E, Sabbag K, Zayontz S, Rubash H: The effect of posterior cruciate retention & substitution on tibial-femoral motion in total knee arthroplasty. Trans Orthop Res Soc 26:1092, 2001.
27. Piziali RL, Rastegar JC: Measurements of the non-linear, coupled stiffness characteristics of the human knee. J Biomech 10:45-55, 1977.
28. Rovick JS, Reuben JD, Schrager RJ, Walker PS: Relation between knee motion and ligament length patterns. Clin Biomech 6:213-220, 1991.
29. Sathasivam S, Walker PS: A computer model with surface friction for the prediction of total knee kinematics. J Biomech 30:177-184, 1997.
30. Shoemaker SC, Markolf KL: Effects of joint load on the stiffness and laxity of ligament-deficient knees. J Bone Joint Surg 67A:136-146, 1985.
31. Singerman R, Pagan HD, Peyser AB, Goldberg VM: Effect of femoral component rotation and patellar design on patellar forces. Clin Orthop 334:345-353, 1997.
32. Steele JR, Roger GJ, Milburn PD: Tibial translation and hamstring activity during active and passive arthrometric assessment of knee laxity. Knee 1:217-223, 1995.
33. Taylor S, Walker PS, Perry J, Cannon SR, Woledge R: The forces in the distal femur and the knee during walking and other activities measured by telemetry. J Arthroplasty 13:428-437, 1998.
34. Walker PS, Ambarek MS, Morris JR, Olanlokun K, Cobb A: Anterior-posterior stability in partially conforming condylar knee replacement. Clin Orthop 310:87-97, 1995.
35. Walker PS, Blunn GW, Broome DR, et al: A knee simulating machine for performance evaluation of total knee replacements. J Biomech 30:83-89, 1997.
36. Walker PS, Blunn GW, Perry JP, et al: Methodology for long-term wear testing of total knee replacements. Clin Orthop 372:290-301, 2000.
37. Wang C-J, Walker PS: Rotatory laxity of the human knee joint. J Bone Joint Surg 56A:161-170, 1974.
38. Werner F, Foster D, Murray DC: The influence of design on the transmission of torque across knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 60A:342-348, 1978.
39. Zavatsky AB: A kinematic-freedom analysis of a flexed-knee-stance testing rig. J Biomech 30:277-280, 1997.
40. Zavatsky AB, O'Connor JJ: A model of the human knee ligaments in the sagittal plane Part 1: Response to passive flexion. Proc Inst Mech Eng 206(H3):125-134, 1992.