Quantitative genetics of sexual selection in the field cricket, Gryllus integer

Evolution

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 848-854

  Gray, David A ^a   Cade, William H ^a  

^a BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Crickets; Genetic correlation; Gryllus; Heritability; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

FEMALE BEHAVIOR; GENETIC VARIATION; MATE CHOICE; SEXUAL SELECTION; SONG;

GRYLLIDAE; GRYLLINAE; GRYLLUS; GRYLLUS INTEGER; ORTHOPTERA;

EID: 0032789782     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05378.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. ANDERSSON, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. BACKUS, V. L., AND W. H. CADE. 1986. Sperm competition in the field cricket Gryllus integer (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Fla. Entomol. 69:722-728.
3. BAKKER, T. C. M. 1993. Positive genetic correlation between female preference and preferred male ornament in sticklebacks. Nature 363:255-257.
4. BAKKER, T. C. M., AND A. POMIANKOWSKI. 1995. The genetic basis of female mate preferences. J. Evol. Biol. 8:129-171.
5. BASOLO, A. L. 1990. Female preference predates the evolution of the sword in swordtail fish. Science 250:808-810.
6. BECKER, W. A. 1992. Manual of quantitative genetics. Academic Enterprises, Pullman, WA.
7. BENTLEY, D. R., AND R. R. HOY. 1972. Genetic control of the neuronal network generating cricket (Teleogryllus Gryllus) song patterns. Anim. Behav 20:478-492.
8. BOAKE, C. R. B. 1991. Coevolution of senders and receivers of sexual signals: genetic coupling and genetic correlations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6:225-227
9. CADE, W. H. 1979a. Field cricket dispersal flights measured by crickets landing at lights. Tex. J. Sci. XXXI:125-130.
10. _. 1979b. Effect of male-deprivation on female phonotaxis in field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Gryllus). Can. Entomol. 111:741-744.
11. _. 1981. Alternative male strategies: genetic differences in crickets. Science 212:563-564.
12. DOHERTY, J. A., AND A. PIRES. 1987. A new microcomputer-based method for measuring walking phonotaxis in field crickets (Gryllidae). J. Exp. Biol. 130:425-432.
13. DOMBROVSKY, Y., AND N. PERRIN. 1994. On adaptive search and optimal stopping in sequential mate choice. Am. Nat. 144:355-361.
14. FALCONER, D. S. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, London.
15. FORSGREN, E. 1992. Predation risk affects mate choice in a Gobiid fish. Am. Nat. 140:1041-1049.
16. FRENCH, B. W., AND W. H. CADE. 1987. The timing of calling, movement, and mating in the field crickets Gryllus veletis, G. pennsylvanicus, and G. integer. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21:157-162.
17. FRY, J. D. 1992. The mixed-model analysis of variance applied to quantitative genetics: biological meaning of the parameters. Evolution 46:540-550.
18. FULTON, B. B. 1933. Inheritance of song in hybrids of two subspecies of Nemobius fasciatus. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 26:368-376.
19. GRAY, D. A., AND W. H. CADE. 1999. Sex, death and genetic variation: natural and sexual selection on cricket song. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 266:707-709.
20. HEDRICK, A. V. 1988. Female choice and the heritability of attractive male traits: an empirical study. Am. Nat. 132:267-276.
21. HEDRICK, A. V., AND L. M. DILL. 1993. Mate choice by female crickets is influenced by predation risk. Anim. Behav. 46:193-196.
22. HOLLAND, B., AND W. R. RICE. 1998. Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52:1-7.
23. HOY, R. R. 1971. Genetic control of acoustic behavior in crickets. Am. Zool. 14:1067-1080.
24. HOY, R. R., AND R. C. PAUL. 1973. Genetic control of song specificity in crickets. Science 180:82-83.
25. HOY, R. R., J. HAHN, AND R. C. PAUL. 1977. Hybrid cricket auditory behavior: evidence for genetic coupling in animal communication. Science 195:82-84.
26. JOHNSTONE, R. A. 1997. The tactics of mutual mate choice and competitive search. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 40:51-59.
27. KIRKPATRICK, M. 1996. Good genes and direct selection in the evolution of mating preferences. Evolution 50:2125-2140.
28. KIRKPATRICK, M., AND N. BARTON. 1995. Déjà vu all over again. Nature 377:388-389.
29. LOHER, W. 1981. The effect of mating on female sexual behavior of Teleogryllus commodus Walker. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 9: 219-225.
30. MOUSSEAU, T. A., AND D. J. HOWARD. 1998. Genetic variation in cricket calling song across a hybrid zone between two sibling species. Evolution 52:1104-1110.
31. POMIANKOWSKI, A. 1988. The evolution of female mate preferences for male genetic quality. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 5:136-184.
32. PROSSER, M., A.-M. MURRAY, AND W. H. CADE. 1997. The influence of female age on phonotaxis during single and multiple song presentations in the field cricket, Gryllus integer (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J. Insect Behav. 10:437-449.
33. REAL, L. A. 1990. Search theory and mate choice. I. Models for single-sex discrimination. Am. Nat. 136:376-404.
34. RYAN, M. J., AND A. KEDDY-HECTOR. 1992. Directional patterns of female mate choice and the role of sensory biases. Am. Nat. 139(Suppl.):4-35.
35. RYAN, M. J., AND A. S. RAND. 1993. Sexual selection and signal evolution: the ghost of biases past. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 340:187-195.
36. SAKALUK, S. K. 1982. Onset of phonotaxis and age at first mating in female house crickets, Acheta domesticus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J. N. Y. Entomol. Soc. XC:136-141.
37. SAKALUK, S. K., AND W. H. CADE. 1983. The adaptive significance of female multiple matings in house and field crickets. Pp. 319-336 in D. K. Gwynne and G. K. Morris, eds. Orthopteran mating systems: sexual competition in a diverse group of insects. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
38. SAS INSTITUTE. 1989. SAS/STAT user's guide. Vers. 6. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
39. SIMMONS, L. W. 1987. Heritability of a male character chosen by females of the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21:129-133.
40. SIMONS, A. M., AND D. A. ROFF. 1994. The effect of environmental variability on the heritabilities of traits of a field cricket. Evolution 48:1637-1649.
41. SMITH, C. J., AND W. H. CADE. 1987. Relative fertility in hybridization experiments using three song types of the field crickets Gryllus integer and Gryllus rubens. Can. J. Zool. 65:2390-2394.
42. SOLYMAR, B., AND W. H. CADE. 1990a. Heritable variation for female mating frequency in field crickets, Gryllus integer. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26:73-76.
43. _. 1990b. Age of first mating in field crickets, Gryllus integer (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Fla. Entomol. 73:193-195.
44. SOUROUKIS, K., W. H. CADE, AND G. ROWELL. 1992. Factors that possibly influence variation in the calling song of field crickets: temperature, time, and male size, age, and wing morphology. Can. J. Zool. 70:950-955.
45. STOUT, J., G. GERHARDT, AND S. HASSO. 1976. Sexual responsiveness mediated by the corpora allata and its relationship to phonotaxis in the female cricket, Acheta domesticus L. J. Comp. Physiol. 108:1-9.
46. WAGNER, W. E., JR. 1998. Measuring female mating preferences. Anim. Behav. 55:1029-1042.
47. WAGNER, W. E., JR., A.-M. MURRAY, AND W. H. CADE. 1995. Phenotypic variation in the mating preferences of female field crickets, Gryllus integer. Anim. Behav. 49:1269-1281.
48. WEBB, K. L., AND D. A. ROFF. 1992. The quantitative genetics of sound production in Gryllus firmus. Anim. Behav. 44:823-832.