Development of nanosomes using high-pressure homogenization for gene therapy

Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology

Volumn 62, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1103-1111

  Kundu, Anup K ^a   Hazari, Sidhartha ^b   Chinta, Dakshinamurthy Devanga ^a   Pramar, Yashoda V ^a   Dash, Srikanta ^b   Mandal, Tarun K ^a  

^a XAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA   (United States)

^b TULANE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

high pressure homogenizer; nanoparticles; nanosomes; pDNA delivery; transfection

Indexed keywords

1,2 DIOLEOYL 3 TRIMETHYLAMMONIOPROPANE; CHOLESTEROL; LIPOSOME; NANOSOME; NUCLEASE; PLASMID DNA; PROTAMINE SULFATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BREAST CELL; CANCER CELL; CELL VIABILITY; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOTOXICITY; DNA INTEGRATION; DRUG FORMULATION; ENZYME METABOLISM; GENE THERAPY; GENETIC TRANSFECTION; LIPOSOMAL GENE DELIVERY SYSTEM; NANOENCAPSULATION; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; ZETA POTENTIAL;

ANIMALS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CHEMISTRY, PHARMACEUTICAL; DNA; GENE THERAPY; GENE TRANSFER TECHNIQUES; GENETIC VECTORS; LIPIDS; LIPOSOMES; MICE; NANOCAPSULES; PLASMIDS; PRESSURE; PROTAMINES; TRANSFECTION;

EID: 77955239779     PISSN: 00223573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.2010.01140.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Miller AD. Human gene therapy comes of age. Nature 1992 357 : 455 460.
2. Ross G et al. Gene therapy in the United States: a five-year status report. Hum Gene Ther 1996 7 : 1781 1790.
3. Otten G et al. Enhancement of DNA vaccine potency in rhesus macaques by electroporation. Vaccine 2004 22 : 2489 2493.
4. Doria-Rose NA, Haigwood NL. DNA vaccine strategies: candidates for immune modulation and immunization regimens. Methods 2003 31 : 207 216.
5. Stratov I et al. Vaccines and vaccine strategies against HIV. Curr Drug Targets 2004 5 : 71 88.
6. Dean HJ et al. Powder and particle-mediated approaches for delivery of DNA and protein vaccines into the epidermis. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 2003 26 : 373 388.
7. Ilan Y. Technology evaluation: naked DNA. Curr Opin Mol Ther 1999 1 : 116 120.
8. Engelhardt JF et al. Adenovirus-mediated transfer of the CFTR gene to lung of nonhuman primates: biological efficacy study. Hum Gene Ther 1993 4 : 759 769.
9. Herz J, Gerard RD. Adenovirus-mediated transfer of low density lipoprotein receptor gene acutely accelerates cholesterol clearance in normal mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993 90 : 2812 2816. (Pubitemid 23113507)
10. Gao X, Huang L. Cationic liposome-mediated gene transfer. Gene Ther 1995 2 : 710 722.
11. Felgner PL. Improvements in cationic liposomes for in vivo gene transfer. Hum Gene Ther 1996 7 : 1791 1793.
12. Wu GY, Wu CH. Receptor-mediated gene delivery and expression in vivo. J Biol Chem 1998 263 : 14621 14624.
13. Boussif O et al. A versatile vector for gene and oligonucleotide transfer into cells in culture and in vivo: polyethylenimine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995 92 : 7297 7301.
14. Zhdanov RI et al. Cationic lipid-DNA complexes-lipoplexes-for gene transfer and therapy. Bioelectrochemistry 2002 58 : 53 64.
15. Brown MD et al. Gene delivery with synthetic (non viral) carriers. Int J Pharm 2001 229 : 1 21.
16. Driessen AJ et al. Mechanistic studies of antibiotic-induced permeabilization of phospholipid vesicles. Biochemistry 1995 34 : 1606 1614.
17. Mayer LD et al. Vesicles of variable sizes produced by a rapid extrusion procedure. Biochim Biophys Acta 1986 858 : 161 168.
18. Lapinski MM et al. Comparison of liposomes formed by sonication and extrusion: rotational and translational diffusion of an embedded chromophore. Langmuir 2007 23 : 11677 11683.
19. Maulucci G et al. Particle size distribution in DMPC vesicles solutions undergoing different sonication times. Biophys J 2005 88 : 3545 3550.
20. Pupo E et al. Preparation of plasmid DNA-containing liposomes using a high-pressure homogenization-extrusion technique. J Control Release 2005 104 : 379 396.
21. Barbadas-Rodriguez R, Sabes M. Factors involved in the production of liposomes with a high-pressure homogenizer. Int J Pharm 2001 213 : 175 186.
22. Bachmann D et al. Preparation of liposomes using a Mini-Lab 8.30 H high-pressure homogenizer. Int J Pharm 1993 91 : 69 74.
23. Talsma H et al. The size reduction of liposomes with a high-pressure homogenizer (Microfluidizer). Characterization of prepared dispersions and comparisons with conventional methods. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1989 15 : 197 207.
24. Liu Y et al. Factors influencing the efficiency of cationic liposome-mediated intravenous gene delivery. Nat Biotechnol 1997 15 : 167 173.
25. Liu F et al. Factors controlling the efficiency of cationic lipid-mediated transfection in vivo via intravenous administration. Gene Ther 1997 4 : 517 523.
26. Templeton NS et al. Improved DNA:liposome complexes for increased systemic delivery and gene expression. Nat Biotechnol 1997 15 : 647 652.
27. Dunne M et al. Encapsulation of protamine sulphate compacted DNA in polylactide and polylactide-co-glycolide microparticles. J Control Release 2003 92 : 209 219.
28. Li S. Characterization of cationic lipid-protamine-DNA (LPD) complexes for intravenous gene delivery. Gene Ther 1998 5 : 930 937.
29. Fischer D et al. In vitro cytotoxicity testing of polycations: influence of polymer structure on cell viability and hemolysis. Biomaterials 2003 24 : 1121 1131.
30. Berger N et al. Filter extrusion of liposomes using different devices: comparison of liposome size, encapsulation efficiency, and process characteristics. Int J Pharm 2001 223 : 55 68.
31. Aoki H et al. Effects of positive charge density on the liposomal surface on disposition kinetics of liposomes in rats. Int J Pharm 1997 156 : 163 174.
32. Perrie Y, Gregoriadis G. Liposome-entrapped plasmid DNA: characterisation studies. Biochim Biophys Acta 2000 1475 : 125 132.
33. Feng M et al. Intracellular uptake and release of poly(ethyleneimine)-co- poly(methyl methacrylate) nanoparticle/pDNA complexes for gene delivery. Int J Pharm 2006 311 : 209 214.