Professional non-neutrality: Criticising the third party in psychotherapy

Sociology of Health and Illness

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 798-816

  Voutilainen, Liisa ^a   Peräkylä, Anssi ^a   Ruusuvuori, Johanna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Conversation analysis; Institutional interaction; Professional neutrality; Psychotherapy

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; ARTICLE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MOTIVATION; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PSYCHOTHERAPY; RECORDING;

AFFECT; GOALS; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROFESSIONAL ROLE; PSYCHOTHERAPY; TAPE RECORDING;

EID: 77955161020     PISSN: 01419889     EISSN: 14679566     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01245.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Antaki C, Barnes R, Leudar I. Diagnostic formulations in psychotherapy. Discourse Studies 2005, 7(6):627-47.
2. Arminen I. Institutional Interaction 2005, Aldershot, Ashgate
3. Beck AT. Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders 1976, New York, International Universities Press
4. Beck AT, Rush AJ, Shaw BF, Emery G. Cognitive Therapy of Depression 1979, New York, The Guilford Press
5. Bercelli F, Rossano F, Viaro M. Clients' responses to therapists' re-interpretations. Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy 2008, Peräkylä A, Antaki C, Vehviläinen SLeudar I. eds, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
6. Bergmann J. Veiled morality: notes on discretion in psychiatry. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings 1992, Drew PHeritage J. eds, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
7. Bergmann J. Noticings - a genuine psychotherapeutic device. 2008, Presentation at the conference: Conversation Analysis and Psychtherapy. Göttingen, 9 - 11 October, 2008
8. Bershady HJ. Affect in social life. After Parsons: a Theory of Social Action for the Twenty-First Century 2005, Fox RCLidz VMBershady HJ. eds, New York, Russell Sage Foundation
9. Clayman SE. Footing in the achievement of neutrality: the case of news interview discourse. Talk at Work: Interaction in InstitutionalSettings 1992, Drew PHeritage J. eds, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
10. Clayman S, Heritage J. The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air 2002, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
11. Drew P. Contested evidence in a courtroom cross examination: the case of a trial for rape. Talk at Work: Social Interaction in Institutional Settings 1992, Drew PHeritage J. eds, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
12. Drew P. Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction 1998, 31(3-4):295-325. pp
13. Drew P, Walker T. Going too far: Complaining, escalating and disaffiliation. Journal of Pragmatics 2009, 41(12):2400-14.
14. Drew P, Heritage J. Analyzing talk at work: an introduction. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings 1992, Drew P, Heritage J. eds, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
15. Fox RC. Essays in Medical Sociology: Journeys into the Field 1979, New York, John Wiley
16. Freud S. Observations on Transference-love 1915, Standard Edition, Vol. 12, London, Hoghart Press
17. Garcia A. Dispute resolution without disputing. How the interactional organisation of mediation hearings minimises argumentative talk. American Sociological Review 1991, 56(6):818-35.
18. Greatbatch D. On the management of disagreement between news interviewees. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings 1992, Drew PHeritage J. eds, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
19. Greenberg JR. Theoretical models and the analyst's neutrality. Contemporary Psychoanalysis 1986, 22(1):89-106.
20. Greenson RR. The Technique and Practice of Psychoanalysis 1967, Madison, International Universities Press
21. Guidano V. The Self in Process 1991, New York, Guilford Press
22. Gunthner S. Complaint stories: constructing emotional reciprocity among women. Communicating Gender in context 1997, Kotthoff HWodak R. eds, Amsterdam, John Benjamins
23. Haakana M. Reported thought in complaint stories. Reporting Talk. Reported Speech in Interaction 2007, Holt EClift R. eds, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
24. Halonen M. Mä en sit siihe sanonu mitää- Raportit sanomatta jättämisestä ja evidentiaalinen partikkeli sit(te(n)) keskustelun kertomuksissa. Virittäjä [Journal of Finnish Linguistic Studies] 2005, 109(2):271-98.
25. Halonen M. Life stories as evidence for the diagnosis of addiction in group therapy. Discourse and Society 2006, 17(3):283-98.
26. Heisterkamp BL. Conversational displays of mediator neutrality in a court-based program. Journal of Pragmatics 2006, 38(12):2051-64.
27. Jefferson G. On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems 1988, 35(4):418-41.
28. Kimerling RE, Zeiss AM, Zeiss Robert A. Therapist emotional responses to patients: building a learning-based language. Cognitive and Behavioural Practice 2000, 7(3):312-21.
29. Kohut H. Analysis of the Self 1971, New York, International Universities Press
30. Psychoanalytic Terms and Concepts 1990, Moore BEFine BD. eds, New Haven, Yale University Press
31. Laplanche J, Pontalis JB. The Language of Psycho-analysis 1973, London, Hogharth Press
32. Linehan MM. Validation and psychotherapy. Empathy Reconsidered: New Directions in Psychotherapy 1997, Bohart ACGreenberg L. eds, Washington, D.C., APA Press
33. Macdonald Keith M. The Sociology of the Professions 1995, London, Sage
34. MacMartin C. Resisting optimistic questions in narrative and solution-focused therapies. Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy 2008, Peräkylä AAntaki CVehviläinen SLeudar I. eds, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
35. Parsons T. The Social System 1951, Glencoe, IL, Free Press
36. Peräkylä A. AIDS Counselling: Institutional interaction and clinical practice 1995, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
37. Peräkylä A. Reliability and validity in research based on naturally occurring social interaction. Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice 2004a, Silverman D. ed, London, Sage
38. Peräkylä A. Conversation analysis. Qualitative Research Practice 2004b, Seale CSilverman DGubrium JGobo G. eds, London, Sage
39. Peräkylä A. Making links in psychoanalytic interpretations: a conversation analytic view. Psychotherapy Research 2004c, 14:289-307.
40. Peräkylä A. Conversation analysis and psychoanalysis: Interpretation, affect and intersubjectivity. Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy 2008, Peräkylä AAntaki CVehviläinen SLeudar I. eds, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
41. Peräkylä A, Vehviläinen S. Conversation analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge. Discourse and Society 2003, 14(6):727-50.
42. Rogers CR. The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology 1957, 21(2):95-103.
43. Ruusuvuori J. 'Empathy' and 'sympathy' in action: attending to patients' troubles in Finnish homeopathic and general practice consultations. Social Psychology Quarterly 2005, 68(3):204-22.
44. Ruusuvuori J. Managing affect. Integration of empathy and problem solvining in health care encounters. Discourse Studies 2007, 9(5):597-622.
45. Ruusuvuori J, Lindfors P. Complaining about previous treatment in health care settings. Journal of Pragmatics 2009, 41(12):2415-34.
46. Safran JD, Segal ZV. Interpersonal Process in Cognitive Therapy 1990, New York, Basic Books
47. Sandler J, Dare C, Holder A. The Patient and the Analyst. The Basis of the Psychoanalytic Process 1992, London, Karnac
48. Schegloff EA. Sequence Organisation in Interaction: a Primer in Conversation Analysis 2007, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
49. Sorjonen ML. Responding in Conversation: a Study of Response Particles in Finnish 2001, Amsterdam, John Benjamins
50. Vehviläinen S. Preparing and delivering interpretations in psychoanalytic interaction. Text 2003, 23(4):573-606.
51. Vehviläinen S, Peräkylä A, Antaki C, Leudar I. A review of the conversational practices of psychotherapy. Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy 2008, Peräkylä A, Antaki C, Vehviläinen S, Leudar I. eds, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
52. Voutilainen L, Peräkylä A, Ruusuvuori J. Recognition and interpretation: responding to emotional experience in psychotherapy. Research on Language and Social Interaction 2010, 43(1):85-107.