Recognition and interpretation: Responding to emotional experience in psychotherapy

Research on Language and Social Interaction

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 85-107

  Voutilainen, Liisa ^a   Peräkylä, Anssi ^a   Ruusuvuori, Johanna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 76649105470     PISSN: 08351813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08351810903474799     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Antaki, C. (2008). Formulations in psychotherapy. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 26-42). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2. Antaki, C., Barnes, R. & Leudar, I. (2005). Diagnostic formulations in psychotherapy. Discourse Studies, 7, 627-647.
3. Arminen, I. (2005). Institutional interaction. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
4. Beck A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
5. Bercelli, F., Rossano F., & Viaro, M. (2008). Clients' responses to therapists' re-interpretations. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 43-62). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
6. Besnier, N. (1990). Language and affect. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 419-451.
7. Buttny, R. (1993). Social accountability in communication. London, England: Sage.
8. Buttny, R. (2004). Talking problems: Studies on discursive construction. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
9. Couper-Kühlen, E. (2006, May). A sequential approach to affect: The case of "disappointment." Plenary presentation at the International Conference on Conversation Analysis (ICCA 06), Helsinki, Finland.
10. Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 3-65). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11. Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London, England: Sage.
12. Ferrara, K. W. (1994). Therapeutic ways with words. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
13. Ford, C., & Thompson, S. (1996). Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 134-185). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14. Freese, J., & Maynard, D. (1998). Prosodic features of bad news and good news in conversation. Language in Society, 27, 195-219.
15. Gendlin, E. T. (1964). A theory of personality change. In P.Worchel & D. Byrne (Eds.), Personality change (pp. 100-148). New York, NY: Wiley.
16. Goffman, E. (1981). Footing. In Forms of talk (pp. 124-127). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
17. Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (2000). Emotion within situated activity. In N. Budwig, I. C. Uzgiris, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), Communication: An arena of development (pp. 33-54). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Greenberg, L., & Elliot, R. (1997). Varieties of empathic responding. In A. C. Bohart, & L. Greenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: New directions in theory research & practice (pp. 167-187). Washington, DC: APA Press.
19. Greenberg, L., & Safran, J. (1987). Emotion in psychotherapy: Affect, cognition and the process of change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
20. Greenson, R. (1967). The technique and practice of psychoanalysis. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
21. Guidano, V. (1991). The self in process. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
22. Günthner, S. (1997). Complaint stories: Constructing emotional reciprocity among women. In H. Kotthoff, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Communicating gender in context (pp. 179-218). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
23. Heath, C. (1988). Embarrassment and interactional organization. In P. Drew & A. Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order (pp. 136-60). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
24. Heath, C. (1989). Pain talk: The expression of suffering in themedical consultation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 113-125.
25. Hepburn, A. (2004). Crying: Notes on description, transcription and interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37, 251-290.
26. Heritage, J., & Watson, R. (1979). Formulations as conversational objects. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language (pp. 123-162) New York, NY: Irvington Press.
27. Hochschild, A. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 551-575.
28. Hutchby, I. (2005). "Active listening": Formulations and the elicitation of feelings-talk in child counselling. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38, 303-329.
29. Jefferson, G. (1980). On "trouble-premonitory" response to inquiry. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 153-185.
30. Jefferson, G. (1988). On the sequential organization of troubles talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 35, 418-442.
31. Jefferson, G., &. Lee, J. R. (1992). The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a "troubles telling" and a "service encounter." In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 521-571). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32. Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
33. Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York, NY: Academic Press.
34. Laitinen, L. (1995). Nollapersoona [Zero-person construction]. Virittäjä, 3, 337-358.
35. MacMartin, C. (2008). Resisting optimistic questions in narrative and solution-focused therapies. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 80-99). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
36. Maynard, D. (1997). The news delivery sequence: Bad news and good news in conversational interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30, 93-130.
37. Maynard, D. (2003). Bad news, good news: Conversational order in everyday talk and clinical settings. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38. Ogden, R. (2001). Turn transition, creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetics Association, 31, 139-152.
39. Peräkylä, A. (1995). AIDS counselling: Institutional interaction clinical practice. Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
40. Peräkylä, A. (2004a). Conversation analysis. In C. Seale, D. Silverman, J. Gubrium,&G. Gobo (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 165-179). London, England: Sage.
41. Peräkylä, A. (2004b). Reliability and validity in research based on naturally occurring social interaction. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 283-304). London, England: Sage.
42. Peräkylä, A. (2004c). Making links in psychoanalytic interpretations: A conversation analytic view. Psychotherapy Research, 14, 289-307.
43. Peräkylä, A. (2005). Patients' responses to interpretations: A dialogue between conversation analysis and psychoanalytic theory. Communication & Medicine, 2, 163-176.
44. Peräkylä, A. (2008). Conversation analysis and psychoanalysis: Interpretation, affect and intersubjectivity. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 100-119). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
45. Peräkylä, A., Antaki, C., Vehviläinen, S., & Leudar, I. (2008). Analysing psychotherapy in practice. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 5-25). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
46. Peräkylä, A., & Silverman, D. (1991). Owning experience: Describing the experience of other persons. Text, 11, 441-480.
47. Peräkylä, A., & Vehviläinen, S. (2003). Conversation analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge. Discourse and Society, 14, 727-750.
48. Pittenger, R. E., Hockett, C. F., & Danehy, J. J. (1961). The first five minutes: A sample of microscopic interview analysis. Ithaca, NY: Paul Martineau.
49. Pomeranz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: Away of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219-229.
50. Rae, J. (2008). Lexical substitution as a therapeutic resource. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 62-79). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
51. Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of science (pp. 184-256). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
52. Ruusuvuori, J. (2005). "Empathy" and "sympathy" in action: Attending to patients' troubles in Finnish homeopathic and general practice consultations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 204-222.
53. Ruusuvuori, J. (2007). Managing affect: Integrating empathy and problem solving in two types of health care consultation. Discourse Studies, 9, 597-622.
54. Ruusuvuori, J., & Lindfors, P. (2009). Complaining about previous treatment in health care settings. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2415-2434.
55. Safran, J. D., & Segal, Z. V. (1990). Interpersonal process in cognitive therapy. New York, NY: Basic Books.
56. Sandlund, E. (2004). Feeling by doing: The social organization of everyday emotions in academic talk-in-interaction. Karlstad, Sweden: Karlstad University Studies 36.
57. Scheflen, A. (1973). Communicational structure: Analysis of a psychotherapy transaction. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
58. Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
59. Silverman, D. (1997). HIV counselling as social interaction. London, England: Sage.
60. Sorjonen, M-L. (2001). Responding in conversation. A study of response particles in Finnish. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
61. Stern, D. (2004). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co.
62. Toskala, A., & Hartikainen, K. (2005). Minuuden rakentuminen. Psyykkinen kehitys ja kognitiivis-konstruktiivinen psykoterapia [Construction of Self. Psychic development and cognitive-constructivisit psychotherapy]. Jyväskylä, Finland: Jyväskylän koulutuskeskus.
63. Vehviläinen, S. (2003). Preparing and delivering interpretations in psychoanalytic interaction. Text, 23, 573-606.
64. Vehviläinen, S., Peräkylä, A., Antaki, C., & Leudar, I. (2008). A review of the conversational practises of psychotherapy. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 188-197). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
65. Vilkuna, M. (1989). Free word order in Finnish: Its syntax and discourse functions. Helsinki, Finland: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
66. Warner, M. A. (1997). Does empathy cure? A theoretical consideration of empathy, processing, and personal narrative. In A. C. Bohart & L. Greenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: New directions in theory research& practice (pp. 125-141). Washington, DC: APA Press.
67. Whalen, J., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1998). Observations on the display and management of emotion in naturally occurring activities: The case of hysteria in calls to 9-1-1. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 141-159.
68. Wootton, A. J. (1997). Interaction and the development of mind. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.