Turbidity hampers mate choice in a pipefish

Ethology

Volumn 116, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 713-721

  Sundin, Josefin ^a   Berglund, Anders ^a   Rosenqvist, Gunilla ^b  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGA; COASTAL WATER; EUTROPHICATION; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FISH; GLOBAL WARMING; MATE CHOICE; OLFACTORY CUE; SEX ROLE; SEXUAL SELECTION; TURBIDITY; VISIBILITY; VISUAL CUE;

ALGAE; ANIMALIA; SYNGNATHUS TYPHLE;

EID: 77955151893     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01787.x     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Anderson D M, Burkholder J M, Cochlan W P, Glibert P M, Gobler C J, Heil C A, Kudela R M, Parsons M L, Rensel J E J, Townsend D W, Trainer V L, Vargo G A. Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: examining linkages from selected coastal regions of the United States. Harmful Algae 2008, 8:39-53.
2. Andersson M. Sexual Selection 1994, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton
3. Arak A. Callers and satellites in the natterjack toad - evolutionarily stable decision rules. Anim. Behav. 1988, 36:416-432.
4. Beaugrand G, Reid P C. Long-term changes in phytoplankton, zooplankton and salmon related to climate. Global Change Biol. 2003, 9:801-817.
5. Beaugrand G, Brander K M, Lindley J A, Souissi S, Reid P C. Plankton effect on cod recruitment in the North Sea. Nature 2003, 426:661-664.
6. Berglund A, Rosenqvist G. Selective males and ardent females in pipefishes. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1993, 32:331-336.
7. Berglund A, Rosenqvist G. Male pipefish prefer ornamented females. Anim. Behav. 2001a, 61:345-350.
8. Berglund A, Rosenqvist G. Male pipefish prefer dominant over attractive females. Behav. Ecol. 2001b, 12:402-406.
9. Berglund A, Rosenqvist G, Svensson I. Reversed sex-roles and parental energy investment in zygotes of 2 pipefish (Syngnathidae) species. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1986a, 29:209-215.
10. Berglund A, Rosenqvist G, Svensson I. Mate choice, fecundity and sexual dimorphism in 2 pipefish species (Syngnathidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1986b, 19:301-307.
11. Berglund A, Rosenqvist G, Bernet P. Ornamentation predicts reproductive success in female pipefish. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1997, 40:145-150.
12. Bradbury J N, Verhencamp S C. Principles of Animal Communication 1998, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, USA
13. Burkholder J M. Implications of harmful microalgae and heterotrophic dinoflagellates in management of sustainable marine fisheries. Ecol. Appl 1998, 8:S37-S62.
14. Candolin U. Population responses to anthropogenic disturbance: lessons from three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus in eutrophic habitats. J. Fish Biol. 2009, 75:2108-2121.
15. Candolin U, Heuschele J. Is sexual selection beneficial during adaptation to environmental change? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23:446-452.
16. Candolin U, Salesto T, Evers M. Changed environmental conditions weaken sexual selection in sticklebacks. J. Evol. Biol. 2007, 20:233-239.
17. Candolin U, Engström-Öst J, Salesto T. Human-induced eutrophication enhances reproductive success through effects on parenting ability in sticklebacks. Oikos 2008, 117:459-465.
18. Collin S P, Collin H B. The foveal photoreceptor mosaic in the pipefish, Corythoichthyes paxtoni (Syngnathidae, Teleostei). Histol. Histopathol. 1999, 14:369-382.
19. Curtis C C, Stoddard P K. Mate preference in female electric fish, Brachyhypopomus pinnicaudatus. Anim. Behav. 2003, 66:329-336.
20. van Doorn G S, Noest A J, Hogeweg P. Sympatric speciation and extinction driven by environment dependent sexual selection. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 1998, 265:1915-1919.
21. Endler J A. Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am. Nat. 1992, 139:S125-S153.
22. Enebjörk L, Fränne I. Characterization of Gullmarn according to the Water Framework Directive. 2006, 42-44. Länsstyrelsen Västra Götalands län, Göteborg, pp
23. Engström-Öst J, Candolin U. Human-induced water turbidity alters selection on sexual displays in sticklebacks. Behav. Ecol. 2007, 18:393-398.
24. Erlandsson C P, Stigebrandt A, Arneborg L. The sensitivity of minimum oxygen concentrations in a fjord to changes in biotic and abiotic external forcing. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2006, 51:631-638.
25. Fisher H S, Rosenthal G G. Female swordtail fish use chemical cues to select well-fed mates. Anim. Behav. 2006, 72:721-725.
26. Fisher H S, Wong B B M, Rosenthal G G. Alteration of the chemical environment disrupts communication in a freshwater fish. Proc. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 2006, 273:1187-1193.
27. Gaston A J, Gilchrist H G, Hipfner J M. Climate change, ice conditions and reproduction in an Arctic nesting marine bird: Brunnich's guillemot (Uria lomvia L.). J. Anim. Ecol. 2005, 74:832-841.
28. Genner M J, Turner G F. The mbuna cichlids of Lake Malawi: a model for rapid speciation and adaptive radiation. Fish Fish. 2005, 6:1-34.
29. Hassan E S. Hydrodynamic imaging of the surroundings by the lateral line of the blind cave fish Anoptichthys jordani. The Mechanosensory Lateral Line Neurobiology and Evolution 1989, 217-228. Coombs SGorner PMunz H. In, eds, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp
30. Heubel K U, Schlupp I. Turbidity affects association behaviour in male Poecilia latipinna. J. Fish Biol. 2006, 68:555-568.
31. Heuschele J, Candolin U. An increase in pH boosts olfactory communication in sticklebacks. Biol. Lett. 2007, 3:411-413.
32. Heuschele J, Mannerla M, Gienapp P, Candolin U. Environment-dependent use of mate choice cues in sticklebacks. Behav. Ecol. 2009, 20:1223-1227.
33. Jerlov N G. Marine Optics 1976, Elsevier, Amsterdam
34. Järvenpää M, Lindström K. Water turbidity by algal blooms causes mating system breakdown in a shallow-water fish, the sand goby Pomatoschistus minutus. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B-Bio. 2004, 271:2361-2365.
35. Landsberg J H. The effects of harmful algal blooms on aquatic organisms. Rev. Fish. Sci. 2002, 10:113-390.
36. Lindahl O. Primary production in the Gullmar fjord. Swedish National Report on Euthropication Status in the Kattegat and Skagerrak OSPAR ASSESMENT 2002. 2003, 20-23. Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Stockholm, pp
37. Long K D, Houde A E. Orange spots as a visual cue for female mate choice in the guppy (Poecilia-reticulata). Ethology 1989, 82:316-324.
38. Luyten P H, Liley N R. geographic-variation in the sexual-behavior of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata (Peters). Behaviour 1985, 95:164-179.
39. Luyten P H, Liley N R. Sexual selection and competitive mating success of maless guppies (Poecilia-reticulata) from 4 trinidad populations. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1991, 28:329-336.
40. Marco A, Chivers D P, Kiesecker J M, Blaustein A R. Mate choice by chemical cues in western redback (Plethodon vehiculum) and Dunn's (P-dunni) salamanders. Ethology 1998, 104:781-788.
41. Marten K, Marler P. Sound-transmission and its significance for animal vocalization. 1. Temperate habitats. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1977, 2:271-290.
42. Maynard Smith J, Harper D. Animal Signals 2003, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford
43. Mazzi D. Parasites make male pipefish careless. J. Evol. Biol. 2004, 17:519-527.
44. Mobley K B, Jones A G. Environmental, demographic, and genetic mating system variation among five geographically distinct dusky pipefish (Syngnathus floridae) populations. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:1476-1490.
45. Mosk V, Thomas N, Hart N S, Partridge J C, Beazley L D, Shand J. Spectral sensitivities of the seahorses Hippocampus subelongatus and Hippocampus barbouri and the pipefish Stigmatopora argus. Visual Neuro. Sci. 2007, 24:345-354.
46. Moyaho A, Garcia C M, Avila-Luna E. Mate choice and visibility in the expression of a sexually dimorphic trait in a goodeid fish (Xenotoca variatus). Can. J. Zool. 2004, 82:1917-1922.
47. Møller A P. Protandry, sexual selection and climate change. Global Change Biol. 2004, 10:2028-2035.
48. Partan S, Marler P. Behavior - communication goes multimodal. Science 1999, 283:1272-1273.
49. Perus J, Bonsdorff E. Long-term changes in macrozoobenthos in the Aland archipelago, northern Baltic Sea. J. Sea Res. 2004, 52:45-56.
50. Plath M, Schlupp I, Parzefall J, Riesch R. Female choice for large body size in the cave molly, Poecilia mexicana (Poeciliidae, Teleostei): influence of species- and sex-specific cues. Behaviour 2007, 144:1147-1160.
51. Ratterman N L, Rosenthal G G, Jones A G. Sex recognition via chemical cues in the sex-role-reversed Gulf pipefish (Syngnathus scovelli). Ethology 2009, 115:339-346.
52. Reddy K R. Diel variations of certain physicochemical parameters of water in selected aquatic systems I. Hydrobiologia 1981, 85:201-207.
53. Reid P C, Edwards M, Beaugrand G, Skogen M, Stevens D. Periodic changes in the zooplankton of the North Sea during the twentieth century linked to oceanic inflow. Fish. Ocean. 2003, 12:260-269.
54. Reusch T B H, Haberli M A, Aeschlimann P B, Milinski M. Female sticklebacks count alleles in a strategy of sexual selection explaining MHC polymorphism. Nature 2001, 414:300-302.
55. Ripley J L, Foran C M. Influence of estuarine hypoxia on feeding and sound production by two sympatric pipefish species (Syngnathidae). Mar. Environ. Res. 2007, 63:350-367.
56. Rosenberg R, Magnusson M, Nilsson H C. Temporal and spatial changes in marine benthic habitats in relation to the EU Water Framework Directive: The use of sediment profile imagery. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2009, 58:565-572.
57. Rosenqvist G. Male mate choice and female female competition for mates in the pipefish Nerophis-ophidion. Anim. Behav. 1990, 39:1110-1115.
58. Rosenqvist G, Johansson K. Male avoidance of parasitized females explained by direct benefits in a pipefish. Anim. Behav. 1995, 49:1039-1045.
59. Sandvik M, Rosenqvist G, Berglund A. Male and female mate choice affects offspring quality in a sex-role-reversed pipefish. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 2000, 267:2151-2155.
60. Seehausen O, van Alphen J J M. The effect of male coloration on female mate choice in closely related Lake Victoria cichlids (Haplochromis nyererei complex). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1998, 42:1-8.
61. Seehausen O, van Alphen J J M, Witte F. Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science 1997, 277:1808-1811.
62. Shohet A J, Watt P J. Female association preferences based on olfactory cues in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2004, 55:363-369.
63. Silva K, Monteiro N M, Vieira M N, Almada V C. Reproductive behaviour of the black-striped pipefish Syngnathus abaster (Pisces; Syngnathidae). J. Fish Biol. 2006, 69:1860-1869.
64. Silva K, Vieira M N, Almada V C, Monteiro N M. The effect of temperature on mate preferences and female-female interactions in Syngnathus abaster. Anim. Behav. 2007, 74:1525-1533.
65. Smith V H. Eutrophication of freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems - a global problem. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 2003, 10:126-139.
66. Taylor E B, Boughman J W, Groenenboom M, Sniatynski M, Schluter D, Gow J L. Speciation in reverse: morphological and genetic evidence of the collapse of a three-spined stickleback (Gasterostus aculeatus) species pair. Mol. Ecol. 2006, 15:343-355.
67. Torti V M, Dunn P O. Variable effects of climate change on six species of North American birds. Oecologia 2005, 145:486-495.
68. Widemo M S. Male but not female pipefish copy mate choice. Behav. Ecol. 2006, 17:255-259.
69. Vincent A, Ahnesjö I, Berglund A. Operational sex-ratios and behavioral sex-differences in a pipefish population. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1994, 34:435-442.
70. Wong B B M, Candolin U, Lindström K. Environmental deterioration compromises socially enforced signals of male quality in three-spined sticklebacks. Am. Nat. 2007, 170:184-189.