Male but not female pipefish copy mate choice

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 255-259

  Widemo, Maria Sandvik ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Copying; Cultural evolution; Mutual mate choice; Pipefish; Sex role reversal; Syngnathus typhle

Indexed keywords

MATE CHOICE; ROLE REVERSAL; SEX ROLE;

SYNGNATHUS TYPHLE;

EID: 32144431746     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arj021     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Berglund A, 1991. Egg competition in a sex-role reversed pipefish: subdominant females trade reproduction for growth. Evolution 45:770-774.
2. Berglund A, 2000. Are female ornaments different from those of males? The pipefish evidence. In: Behaviour and conservation of littoral fishes (Almada VC, Oliveira RF, Goncalves EJ, eds). Lisboa: Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, pp. 231-248.
3. Berglund A, Rosenqvist G, 1993. Selective males and ardent females in pipefishes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:331-336.
4. Berglund A, Rosenqvist G, Bernet P, 1997. Ornamentation predicts reproductive success in female pipefish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 40:145-150.
5. Berglund A, Rosenqvist G, Svensson I, 1989. Reproductive success of females limited by males in two pipefish species. Am Nat 133:506-516.
6. Briggs SE, Godin JGJ, Dugatkin LA, 1996. Mate-choice copying under predation risk in the Trinidadian guppy Poecilia reticulata. Behav Ecol 7:151-157.
7. Brooks R, 1996. Copying and the repeatability of mate choice. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:323-329.
8. Brooks R, 1998. The importance of mate copying and cultural inheritance of mating preferences. Trends Ecol Evol 13:45-46.
9. Brooks R, 1999. Mate choice copying in guppies: females avoid the place where they saw courtship. Behaviour 4:411-421.
10. Dugatkin LA, 1998. Genes, copying, and female mate choice: shifting thresholds. Behav Ecol 8:323-327.
11. Dugatkin LA, Godin JGJ, 1992. Reversal of female mate choice by copying in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Proc R Soc Lond B 249:179-184.
12. Dugatkin LA, Godin JGJ, 1993. Female mate copying in the guppy Poecilia reticulata: age-dependent effects. Behav Ecol 4:289-292.
13. Dugatkin LA, Godin JGJ, 1998. Effects of hunger on mate-choice copying in the guppy. Ethology 104:194-202.
14. Fiske P, Kalas JA, Saether SA, 1996. Do female great snipe copy each other's mate choice? Anim Behav 51:1355-1362.
15. Galef BGJ, White DJ, 1998. Mate-choice copying in Japanese quail, Coturnix coturnix japonica. Anim Behav 55:545-552.
16. Gibson RM, Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL, 1991. Mate choice in lekking sage grouse revisited: the roles of vocal display, female site fidelity and copying. Behav Ecol 2:165-180.
17. Gibson RM, Langen TA, 1996. How do animals choose their mates? Trends Ecol Evol 11:468-470.
18. Goldschmidt T, Bakker TCM, Feuth DBE, 1993. Selective copying in mate choice of female sticklebacks. Anim Behav 45:541-547.
19. Grant JWA, Green LD, 1996. Mate copying versus preference for actively courting males by female Japanese medaka Oryzias latipes. Behav Ecol 7:165-167.
20. Höglund J, Alatalo RV, Gibson RM, Lundberg A, 1995. Mate-choice copying in black grouse. Anim Behav 49:1627-1633.
21. Höglund J, Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, 1990. Copying the mate choice of others? Observations on female black grouse. Behaviour 114:221-231.
22. Lafleur DL, Lozano GA, Sclafani M, 1997. Female mate-choice copying in guppies, Poecilia reticulata: a re-evaluation. Anim Behav 54:579-586.
23. Marks A, Deutsch JC, Clutton-Brock TH, 1994. Stochastic influences, female copying and the intensity of sexual selection on leks. J Theor Biol 170:159-162.
24. McGomb K, Clutton-Brock T, 1994. Is mate choice copying or aggregation responsible for skewed distributions of females on leks? Proc R Soc Lond B 255:13-19.
25. Patriquin MKJ, GodinJGJ, 1998. Do female three-spined sticklebacks copy the mate choice of others? Am Nat 151:570-577.
26. Pruett-Jones S, 1992. Independent versus nonindependent mate choice: do females copy each other? Am Nat 140:1000-1009.
27. Sandvik M, Rosenqvist G, Berglund A, 2000. Male and female mate choice affects offspring quality in a sex-role reversed pipefish. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:2151-2155.
28. Schlupp I, Marler C, Ryan MJ, 1994. Benefit to male sailfin mollies of mating with heterospecific females. Science 263:373-374.
29. Schlupp I, Ryan MJ, 1997. Male sailfin mollies Poecilia latipinna copy the mate choice of other males. Behav Ecol 8:104-107.
30. Spurrier MF, Boyce MS, Manly BFJ, 1994. Lek behaviour in captive sage grouse Centrocerus urophasianus. Anim Behav 47:303-310.
31. Vincent ACJ, Berglund A, Ahnesjö I, 1995. Reproductive ecology of five pipefish species in one eelgrass meadow. Environ Biol Fishes 44:347-361.
32. Wade MJ, 1979. Sexual selection and variance in reproductive success. Am Nat 114:742-764.
33. Westneat DF, Walters A, McCarthy TM, Hatch MI, Hein WK, 2000. Alternative mechanisms of nonindependent mate choice. Anim Behav 3:467-476.
34. Witte K, Ryan MJ, 1998. Male body length influences mate-choice copying in the sailfin molly Poecilia latipinna. Behav Ecol 9:534-539.