Fouling behavior of electroacidified soy protein extracts during cross-flow ultrafiltration using dynamic reversible-irreversible fouling resistances and CFD modeling

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 361, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 191-205

  Rajabzadeh, Amin Reza ^a   Moresoli, Christine ^a   Marcos, Bernard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD); Electroacidification; Fouling; Soy protein; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; FOULING; MEMBRANE FOULING; PROTEINS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS MODELING; CONTINUITY EQUATIONS; CROSS-FLOW ULTRAFILTRATION; ELECTROACIDIFICATION; IRREVERSIBLE FOULING; PRESSURE DIFFERENCES; PROTEIN CONCENTRATIONS; SOY PROTEIN;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

SOYBEAN PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ACIDIFICATION; ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; CROSSFLOW FILTRATION; FOULING CONTROL; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; THEORETICAL MODEL; ULTRAFILTRATION; VELOCITY; VISCOSITY;

EID: 77955057878     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.05.057     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Berman A. Laminar flow in channels with porous walls. J. Appl. Phys. 1953, 24:1232-1236.
2. Granger J., Dodds J., Midoux N. Laminar flow in channels with porous walls. Chem. Eng. J. Biochem. Eng. J. 1989, 42:193-204.
3. Yeh H.M., Dong J.H., Shi M.Y. Momentum balance analysis of flux and pressure declines in membrane ultrafiltration along tubular modules. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 241:335-345.
4. Tu S., Ravindran V., Pirbazari M. A pore diffusion transport model for forecasting the performance of membrane processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 265:29-50.
5. Secchi A.R., Wada K., Tessaro I.C. Simulation of an ultrafiltration process of bovine serum albumin in hollow-fiber membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 160:255-265.
6. Bessiere Y., Fletcher D.F., Bacchin P. Numerical simulation of colloid dead-end filtration: effect of membrane characteristics and operating conditions on matter accumulation. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 313:52-59.
7. Subramani A., Kim S., Hoek E.M.V. Pressure, flow, and concentration profiles in open and spacer-filled membrane channels. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 277:7-17.
8. Pak A., Mohammadi T., Hosseinalipour S.M., Allahdini V. CFD modeling of porous membranes. Desalination 2008, 222:482-488.
9. Huang L., Morrissey M.T. Finite element analysis as a tool for crossflow membrane filter simulation. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 155:19-30.
10. Wiley D.E., Fletcher D.F. Techniques for computational fluid dynamics modelling of flow in membrane channels. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 211:127-137.
11. Marcos B., Moresoli C., Skorepova J., Vaughan B. CFD modeling of a transient hollow fiber ultrafiltration system for protein concentration. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 337:136-144.
12. Ghidossi R., Veyret D., Moulin P. Computational fluid dynamics applied to membranes: state of the art and opportunities. Chem. Eng. Process. 2006, 45:437-454.
13. Ma S., Kassinos S.C., Kassinos D. Direct simulation of the limiting flux: I. Introduction of the experimental results. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 337:81-91.
14. Schausberger P., Norazman N., Li H., Chen V., Friedl A. Simulation of protein ultrafiltration using CFD: comparison of concentration polarization and fouling effects with filtration and protein adsorption experiments. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 337:1-8.
15. Cheryan M. Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook 1998, Technomic Pub. Co., Lancaster, PA.
16. Krishna Kumar N.S., Yea M.K., Cheryan M. Ultrafiltration of soy protein concentrate: performance and modelling of spiral and tubular polymeric modules. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 244:235-242.
17. Skorepova J., Moresoli C. Carbohydrate and mineral removal during the production of low-phytate soy protein isolate by combined electroacidification and high shear tangential flow ultrafiltration. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55:5645-5652.
18. J. Skorepova, Effect of electroacidification on ultrafiltration performance and physicochemical properties of soy protein extracts, PhD Thesis, University of Waterloo, 2007.
19. Mondor M., Ippersiel D., Lamarche F., Boye J.I. Effect of electro-acidification treatment and ionic environment on soy protein extract particle size distribution and ultrafiltration permeate flux. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 231:169-179.
20. Mondor M., Ippersiel D., Lamarche F., Boye J.I. Production of soy protein concentrates using a combination of electroacidification and ultrafiltration. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52:6991-6996.
21. Furukawa T., Kokubo K., Nakamura K., Matsumoto K. Modeling of the permeate flux decline during MF and UF cross-flow filtration of soy sauce lees. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 322:491-502.
22. Damak K., Ayadi A., Zeghmati B., Schmitz P. A new Navier-Stokes and Darcy's law combined model for fluid flow in crossflow filtration tubular membranes. Desalination 2004, 161:67-77.
23. Schmitz P., Prat M. 3-D laminar stationary flow over a porous surface with suction: description at pore level. AIChE J. 1995, 41:2212-2226.
24. Noordman T.R., Kooiker K., Bel W., Dekker M., Wesselingh J.A. Concentration of aqueous extracts of defatted soy flour by ultrafiltration-effect of suspended particles on the filtration flux. J. Food Eng. 2003, 58:135-141.
25. Bowen W.R., Williams P.M. The osmotic pressure of electrostatically stabilized colloidal dispersions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1996, 184:241-250.
26. Ho C.C., Zydney A.L. A combined pore blockage and cake filtration model for protein fouling during microfiltration. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2000, 232:389-399.
27. Kilduff J.E., Mattaraj S., Belfort G. Flux decline during nanofiltration of naturally-occurring dissolved organic matter: effects of osmotic pressure, membrane permeability, and cake formation. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 239:39-53.
28. Choi H, Zhang K., Dionysiou D.D., Oerther D.B., Sorial G.A. Influence of cross-flow velocity on membrane performance during filtration of biological suspension. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 248:189-199.
29. Li M., Zhao Y., Zhou S., Xing W., Wong F.-S. Resistance analysis for ceramic membrane microfiltration of raw soy sauce. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 299:122-129.
30. Aimar P., Taddei C., Lafaille J., Sanchez V. Mass transfer limitations during ultrafiltration of cheese whey with inorganic membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1988, 38:203-221.
31. Yee K.W.K., Wiley D.E., Bao J. A unified model of the time dependence of flux decline for the long-term ultrafiltration of whey. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 332:69-80.
32. Marshall A.D., Munro P.A., Tragardh G. Effect of protein fouling in microfiltration and ultrafiltration on permeate flux, protein retention and selectivity: a literature review. Desalination 1993, 91:65-108.
33. Matthiasson E. Role of macromolecular adsorption in fouling of ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1982, 16:23-36.
34. Turker M., Hubble J. Membrane fouling in a constant-flux ultrafiltration cell. J. Membr. Sci. 1987, 34:269-281.
35. Keller K.H., Canales E.R., Yum S.I. Tracer and mutual diffusion coefficients of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. 1971, 75:379-387.