Momentum balance analysis of flux and pressure declines in membrane ultrafiltration along tubular modules

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 241, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 335-345

  Yeh, H M ^a   Dong, J H ^a   Shi, M Y ^a  

^a TAMKANG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Declination; Momentum balance; Permeate flux; Tubular membrane; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; FLOW OF FLUIDS; PRESSURE DROP; ULTRAFILTRATION;

FLOW RATES; MEMBRANE ULTRAFILTRATION; MOMENTUM BALANCE;

LIQUID MEMBRANES;

FLOW MODELING; MEMBRANE; MOMENTUM; ULTRAFILTRATION;

ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FLOW RATE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MEMBRANE; PREDICTION; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOLUTE; TUBE; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 4043104176     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. W.F. Blatt, A. Dravid, A.S. Michales, L. Nelsen, Solute polarization and cake formation in membrane ultrafiltration: causes, consequences, and control techniques, in: J.E. Filnn (Ed.), Membrane Science and Technology, Plenum Press, New York, 1970, p. 47.
2. Porter M.C. Concentration polarization with membrane ultrafiltration. Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Res. Dev. 11:1972;234
3. Grieves R.B., Bhattacharyya D., Schomp W.G., Bewley J.L. Membrane ultrafiltration of a nonionic surfactant. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 19:1973;766
4. Shen J.J.S., Probstein R.F. On the prediction of limiting flux in laminar ultrafiltration of macromolecular solutions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 16:1977;459
5. Nokao S., Nomura T., Kimura S. Characteristics of macromolecular gel layer formed on ultrafiltration tubular membrane. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 25:1979;615
6. Fane A.G., Fell C.J.D., Waters A.G. The relationship between membrane surface pore characteristics and flux for ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 9:1981;245
7. Fane A.G. Ultrafiltration of suspensions. J. Membr. Sci. 20:1984;249
8. Wijmans J.G., Nakao S., Smolders C.A. Flux limitation in ultrafiltration: osmotic pressure model and gel layer model. J. Membr. Sci. 20:1984;115
9. Kozinski A.A., Lightfoot E.N. Protein ultrafiltration: a general example of boundary layer filtration. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 18:1972;1030
10. Leung W., Probstein R.F. Low polarization in laminar ultrafiltration of macromolecular solutions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 18:1979;274
11. Wendt R.P., Klein E., Holland F.F., Eberle K.E. Hollow fiber ultrafiltration of calf serum and albumin in the pregel uniform-wall-flux region. Chem. Eng. Commun. 8:1981;251
12. Nakao S., Kimura S. Models of membrane transport phenomena and their applications for ultrafiltration data. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 15:1982;200
13. Kleinstreuer C., Paller M.S. Laminar dilute suspension flows in plate-and-frame ultrafiltration units. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 29:1983;529
14. Clifton M.J., Abidine N., Aptel P., Sanchez V. Growth of the polarization layer in ultrafiltration with hollow-fiber membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 21:1984;233
15. Gooding Ma R.P., Gooding C.H., Alexander W.K. A dynamic model for low-pressure, hollow-fiber ultrafiltration. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 31:1985;1728
16. Nabetani H., Nakajima M., Watanabe A., Nakao S., Kumura S. Effects of osmotic pressure and adsorption on ultrafiltration of ovalbumin. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 36:1990;907
17. Chiang B.H., Cheryan M. Ultrafiltration on skim milk in hollow fibers. J. Food Sci. 51:1986;340
18. Assadi M., White D.A. A model for determining the steady state flux of inorganic microfiltration membrane. Chem. Eng. J. 48:1992;11
19. Yeh H.M., Cheng T.W. Resistance-in-series of membrane ultrafiltration in hollow fiber of tube-and-shell arrangement. Sep. Sci. Technol. 28:1993;1341
20. Yeh H.M., Wu H.H. Membrane ultrafiltration in combined hollow-fiber module systems. J. Membr. Sci. 124:1997;93
21. Yeh H.M., Tsai J.W. Membrane ultrafiltration in multipass hollow-fiber modules. J. Membr. Sci. 142:1998;61
22. A.G. Fane, Ultrafiltration: factors influencing flux and rejection, in: R.J. Wakeman (Ed.), Progress in Filtration and Separation, vol. 4, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1986.
23. Yeh H.M., Wu H.P., Dong J.F. Effect of design and operating parameters on the declination of permeate flux for membrane ultrafiltration along hollow-fiber modules. J. Membr. Sci. 213:2003;33
24. Yeh H.M. Decline of permeate flux for ultrafiltration along membrane tubes. Desalination. 145:2002;153
25. R.B. Bird, W.E. Stewart, E.N. Lightfoot, Transport Phenomena, Wiley, New York, 1971, p. 35.
26. Chiang B.H., Cheryan M. Ultrafiltration on skim milk in hollow fibers. J. Food Sci. 51:1986;340
27. Nabetani H., Nakajima M., Watanabe A., Nakao S., Kumura S. Effects of osmotic pressure and adsorption on ultrafiltration of ovalbumin. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 360:1990;907
28. Assadi M., White D.A. A model for determining the steady state flux of inorganic microfiltration membrane. Chem. Eng. J. 48:1992;11
29. Yeh H.M., Wu H.H. Membrane ultrafiltration in combined hollow-fiber module systems. J. Membr. Sci. 124:1997;93
30. Yeh H.M., Tsai J.W. Membrane ultrafiltration in multipass hollow-fiber modules. J. Membr. Sci. 142:1998;61
31. Yeh H.M., Chen H.Y., Chen K.T. Membrane ultrafiltration in a tubular module with a steel rod inserted concentrically for improved performance. J. Membr. Sci. 168:2000;121
32. Yeh H.M., Chen K.T. Improvement of ultrafiltration performance in tubular membranes using a twisted wire-rod assembly. J. Membr. Sci. 178:2000;43