An investigation of the relationship between retention in first grade and performance on high stakes tests in third grade

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 166-182

  Hughes, Jan N ^a   Chen, Qi ^b   Thoemmes, Felix ^a   Kwok, Oi Man ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Elementary students; Grade retention; High stakes testing

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954893583     PISSN: 01623737     EISSN: 19351062     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0162373710367682     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Achieve. (2002). Three paths, one destination: Standards-based reform in Maryland, Massachusetts, and Texas. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved January 8, 2009, from http://www.achieve.org/node/265.
2. Alexander, K.A., Entwisle, D.R., & Dauber, S.L. (2003). On the success of failure: A reassessment of the effects of retention in the primary grades. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Allen, C., Chen, Q., Willson, V., & Hughes, J.N. (2009). Quality of design moderates effects of grade retention on achievement: A meta-analytic, multi-level analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31, 480-499.
4. Bali, V.A., Anagnostopoulos, D., & Roberts, R. (2005). Toward a political explanation of grade retention. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 133-155.
5. Barnard, J., & Rubin, D.B. (1999). Small-sample degrees of freedom with multiple imputation. Biometrika, 86, 948-955.
6. Beebe-Frankenberger, M., Bocian, K.M., MacMillan, D.L., & Gresham, F.M. (2004). Sorting second-grade students: Differentiating those retained from those promoted. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 204-215.
7. Booher-Jennings, J. (2005). Below the bubble: Educational triage and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 231-231.
8. Bracken, B.A., & McCallum, S. (1998). Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test. Chicago: Riverside.
9. Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
10. Chinn, S. (2000). A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 3127-3131.
11. Florida Department of Education. (2004). Good cause exemptions. Retrieved January 1, 2009, from http://www.fldoe.org/ese/pdf/y2004-17.pdf.
12. Florida Department of Education. (2005). Press release. Retrieved October 16, 2008, from http://www.fldoe.org/news/2005/2005_12_13.asp.
13. Ghisletta, P., & Spini, D. (2004). An introduction to generalized estimating equations and an application to assess selectivity effects in a longitudinal study on very old individuals. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 421-437.
14. Hardin, J.W., & Hilbe, J.M. (2002). Generalized estimating equations. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
15. Heubert, J. P., & Hauser, R. M. (Eds.). (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. Hill, J. (2004). Reducing bias in treatment effect estimation in observational studies suffering from missing data. Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy Working Paper 04-01, Columbia University, New York, NY. Retrieved December 4, 2009, from http://iserp.columbia.edu/files/iserp/2004_01.pdfiserp.columbia.edu/files/iserp/2004_01.pdf.
17. Ho, D., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. (2007). Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis, 15, 199-236.
18. Holmes, C.T. (1989). Grade-level retention effects: A meta-analysis of research studies. In L. A. Shepard & M. L. Smith (Eds.), Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention (pp. 16-33). London: The Falmer Press.
19. Hong, G., & Raudenbush, S.W. (2005). Effects of kindergarten retention policy on children's cognitive growth reading and mathematics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 205-224.
20. Hong, G., & Yu, B. (2008). Effects of kindergarten retention on children's social-emotional development: An application of propensity score method to multivariate, multilevel data. Developmental Psychology, 44, 407-421.
21. Jimerson, S.R. (2001a). Meta-analysis of grade retention research: Implications for practice in the 21st century. School Psychology Review, 30, 420-437.
22. Jimerson, S.R. (2001b). Winning the battle and losing the war: Examining the relation between grade retention and dropping out of high school. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 441-457.
23. Jimerson, S., Carlson, E., Rotert, M., Egeland, B., & Sroufe, L.A. (1997). A prospective, longitudinal study of the correlates and consequences of early grade retention. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 3-25.
24. Karweit, N.L. (1999). Grade retention: Prevalence, timing, and effects (Report No. 33). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, CRESPAR.
25. Lorence, J. (2006). Retention and academic achievement research revisited from a United States perspective. International Education Journal, 7, 731-777.
26. McCoy, A.R., & Reynolds, A.J. (1999). Grade retention and school performance: An extended investigation. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 273-298.
27. Owings, W.A., & Magliaro, S. (1998). Grade retention: A history of failure. Educational Leadership, 56, 86-88.
28. Powell, H.A. (2008). Third grade retention and Florida's pupil progression plan: Individual and school characteristics associated with long-term outcomes in reading performance. Dissertation Abstracts International: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 68(11-A), 4651. (University Microfilms No. 3292572).
29. Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y.F., Congdon, R., du Toit, M. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear & Nonlinear Modeling. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International.
30. Rosenbaum, P.A. (2002). Observational studies (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
31. Rosenbaum, P.A., & Rubin, D.B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41-55.
32. Rubin, D.B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: John Wiley.
33. Schafer, J.L. (2006). Marginal modeling of intensive longitudinal data by generalized estimating equations. In T. A. Walls & J. L. Schafer (Eds.), Models for intensive longitudinal data (pp. 38-62). New York: Oxford University Press.
34. Schafer, J.L., & Kang, J.D.Y. (2008). Average causal effects from non-randomized studies: A practical guide and simulated case study. Psychological Methods, 13, 279-313.
35. Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
36. Shadish, W.R., Luellen, J.K., & Clark, M.H. (2006). Propensity scores and quasi-experiments: A testimony to the practical side of Lee Sechrest. In R. R. Bootzin & P. E. McKnight (Eds.), Strengthening research methodology: Psychological measurement and evaluation (pp. 143-157). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
37. Shepard, L.A., Smith, M.L., & Marion, S.F. (1996). Failed evidence on grade retention [Review of the book, On the success of failure: A reassessment of the effects of retention in the primary grades]. Psychology in the Schools, 33, 251-261.
38. Sipple, J.W., Killeen, K., & Monk, D.H. (2004). Adoption and adaptation: School district responses to state imposed learning and graduation requirements. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 143-168.
39. Texas Education Agency. (2004). TAKS information booklets. Retrieved January 9, 2009, from http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/taks/booklets/index.html.
40. Texas Education Agency. (2007). Grade-level retention in Texas public schools, 2005-06 (Document No. GE08 601 01). Austin, TX: Author. Retrieved October 17, 2008, from http://www.tea.state.tx.us/research/pdfs/retention_2005-06.pdf.
41. Texas Education Agency. (2008a). About the Student Assessment Program. Retrieved January 2, 2009, from http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/about/overview.html.
42. Texas Education Agency. (2008b). 2008 accountability manual. Retrieved January 8, 2009, from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2008/manual/index.html.
43. Tomchin, E.M., & Impara, J.C. (1992). Unraveling teachers' beliefs about grade retention. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 199-123.
44. U.S. Department of Education. (1999). Taking responsibility for ending social promotion. Retrieved January 23, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/PDFDocs/socialprom.pdf.
45. U.S. Department of Education. (2006). Improving data quality for Title I standards, assessment, and accountability reporting. Retrieved September 23, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/standardsassessment/nclbdataguidance.pdf.
46. United States National Center for Education Statistics (2006). Student effort and educational progress. Retrieved April 20, 2010 from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2006/section3/indicator25.asp.
47. Watanabe, M. (2007). Displaced teacher and state priorities in a high-stakes accountability context. Educational Policy, 21(2), 311-368. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0895904805284114.
48. Willson, V.L., & Hughes, J.N. (2009). Who is retained in first grade? A psychosocial perspective. The Elementary School Journal, 109, 267-281.
49. Woodcock, R.W., McGrew, K.S., & Mather, N. (2001). WJ-III Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
50. Woodcock, R.W., & Muñoz-Sandoval, A.F. (1996). Batería Woodcock-Muñoz: Pruebas de Aprovechamiento-Revisada [Woodcock-Muñoz Battery: Achievement Tests-Revised]. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
51. Wu, W., West, S.G., & Hughes, J.N. (2008a). Effect of retention in first grade on children's achievement trajectories over four years: A piecewise growth analysis using propensity score matching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 727-740.
52. Wu, W., West, S.G., & Hughes, J.N. (2008b). Short-term effects of grade retention on the growth rate of Woodcock-Johnson III Broad Math and Reading scores. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 85-105.