Assessment certitude as a feedback strategy for learners' constructed responses

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 25-45

  Kealy, W ^a   Ritzhaupt, A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954868436     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/EC.43.1.c     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Andre, T., & Thieman, A. (1988). Level of adjunct question, type of feedback, and learning concepts by reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13(3), 296-307.
2. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 213-238.
3. Braun, H. I., Bennett, R. E., Frye, D., & Soloway, E. (1990). Scoring constructed responses using expert systems. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27(2), 93-108.
4. Butler, D. L. & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281.
5. Butterfield, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2001). Errors committed with high confidence are hyper-corrected. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(6), 1491-1494.
6. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Skokie, IL: Rand McNally.
7. Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2000). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
8. Hancock, T. E., Stock, W. A., & Kulhavy, R. W. (1992). Predicting feedback effects from response-certitude estimates. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 173-176.
9. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
10. Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. A. (1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1(4), 279-308.
11. Kulhavy, R. W., Yekovich, F. R., & Dyer, J. W. (1976). Feedback and response confidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 522-528.
12. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), 79-97.
13. Leacock, C., & Chodorow, M. (2003). C-rater: Automated scoring of short-answer questions. Computers and the Humanities, 37(4), 389-405.
14. Mason, B. J., & Bruning, R. (2001). Providing feedback in computer-based instruction: What the research tells us. (CLASS Project Research Report No. 9). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Center for Instructional Innovation.
15. Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: The role of prior domain knowledge. Contemporary Education Psychology, 33, 270-298.
16. Mory, E. H. (1994). The use of response certitude in adaptive feedback: Effects on student performance, feedback study time, and efficiency. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11(3), 263-290.
17. Mory, E. H. (2004). Feedback research revisited. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 745-783). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Reeves, T. C. (2000). Socially responsible educational technology research. Educational Technology, 40(6), 19-28.
19. Schunk, D. H. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children's cognitive skill learning, American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 359-382.
20. Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 159-172.
21. Schunk, D. H. (2008). Learning theories: An educational perspective (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
22. Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Self-regulatory processes during computer skill acquisition: Goal and self-evaluative influences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 251-260.
23. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.
24. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Willson, V. L., & Putnam, R. R. (1982). A meta-analysis of pretest sensitization effects in experimental design. American Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 249-258.
26. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Achieving self-regulation: The trial and triumph of adolescence. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Academic motivation of adolescents (pp. 1-27). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
27. Zimmerman, B. J. (2008a). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183.
28. Zimmerman, B. J. (2008b). Goal setting: A key proactive source of academic self-regulation. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning (pp. 267-295). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.