Risk management by labelling 26 fragrances?. Evaluation of Article 10 (1) of the seventh Amendment (Guideline 2003/15/EC) of the Cosmetic Directive

International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health

Volumn 213, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 308-320

  Klaschka, Ursula ^a  

^a ULM UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Consumer protection; Contact allergy; Cosmetic products; Cosmetics Directive; Fragrances; Risk management

Indexed keywords

ALLERGEN; COSMETIC;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; LEGAL ASPECT; PACKAGING; RISK MANAGEMENT; SAFETY; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; PRODUCT SAFETY;

ALLERGENS; CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY; COSMETICS; PRODUCT LABELING; RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 77954862457     PISSN: 14384639     EISSN: 1618131X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2010.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Anon., 2005. The Administrative Regulation on the Classification of Substances Hazardous to Waters into Water Hazard Classes (Verwaltungsvorschrift wassergefährdende Stoffe-VwVwS.
2. Anderson R., Anderson J. Acute toxic effects of fragrance products. Arch. Environ. Health 1998, 53(2):138-146.
3. Api A.M., Basketter D.A., Cadby P.A., Cano M.-F., Ellis G., Gerberick F.G., Griem P., McNamee P.M., Ryan C.A., Safford R. Dermal sensitization quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for fragrance ingredients. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2008, 52:3-23.
4. Api A.M., Vey M. Implementation of the dermal sensitization Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) for fragrance ingredients. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2008, 52:53-61.
5. Basketter D.A., Clapp C., Jefferies D., Safford B., Ryan C.A., Gerberick F., Dearman R.J., Kimber I. Predictive identification of human skin sensitization thresholds. Contact Dermatitis 2005, 53:260-267.
6. Basketter D.A., Clapp C.J., Safford B.J., Jowsey I.R., McNamee P., Ryan C.A., Gerberick F.G. Preservatives and skin sensitization quantitative risk assessment. Dermatitis 2008, 19:20-27.
7. Basketter, D., Gerberick, F., Kimber, I., 2008b. Appendix A: LLNA/EC3 Validation-Submission ICCVAM Draft Background Review Document Use of the Murine Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) to Determine Skin Sensitization Potency Categories.
8. Bickers D.R., Calow P., Greim H.A., Hanifin J.M., Rogers A.E., Saurat J.-H., Sipes I.G., Smith R.L., Tagami H. The safety assessment of fragrance materials. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2003, 37:218-273.
9. DAAB, 2009. DAAB Infoservice. Product List Tested by Members of the German Allergy and Asthma Association (DAAB) (in German) (date 4th May 2009).
10. Daughton C.G., Ternes T. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment. Agents of subtle changes?. Environ. Health Persp. 1999, 107:907-938.
11. Daughton, C.G., Jones-Lepp, T.L., 2001. Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in the Environment. Scientific and Regulatory Issues. ACS Symposium Series 791, American Chemical Society, Washington DC.
12. EC, 2002. Endocrine Disruptors: Study on Gathering Information on 435 Substances with Insufficient Data. European Commission, DG ENV, Final Report, RPS-BKH Report.
13. EC, 2003. Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 February 2003 Amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the Approximation of the Laws of the Member States Relating to Cosmetic Products. Off J Eur Union 66, pp. 26-35.
14. EC, 2004. Regulation (EC) No 648/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on detergents.
15. EC, 2006a. Regulation (EC) No 907/2006 of 20 June 2006 Amending Regulation (EC) No 648/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Detergents, in Order to Adapt Annexes III and VII thereto.
16. EC, 2006b. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 Concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), Establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and Repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC.
17. EC, 2007. Commission Decision 2007/506/EC of 21 June 2007 Establishing the Ecological Criteria for the Award of the Community Eco-label to Soaps, Shampoos and Hair Conditioners (notified under document number C(2007) 3127.
18. EC, 2008a. Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, OJ L 353 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures-Amending and Repealing Directive 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.
19. EC, 2008b. European Parliament Legislative Resolution of 24 March 2009 on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Cosmetic Products (COM(2008)0049).
20. ECETOC. 2003. Contact Sensitisation: Classification According to Potency. Technical report no. 87.
21. EEC, 1967. Council Directive 67/548/EEC as Amended by Commission Directive 2001/59/EC of 6 August 2001 Adapting to Technical Progress for the 28th time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the Approximation of the Laws, Regulations and Administrative Provisions relating to the Classification, Packaging and Labelling of Dangerous Substances. Official Journal L 225, 12/8/2001.
22. EEC, 1976. Council Directive 76/768/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the Approximation of the Laws of the Member States Relating to Cosmetic Products. Off J L 262, 27/09/1976, 169-200.
23. Europäisches Verbraucherzentrum Wien, 2009. http://www.evz.de/UNIQ123625180419782/doc1767A.html.
24. Fragrance Products Information Network, 2005. http://www.fpinva.org/.
25. Frosch P.J., Pirker C., Rastogi S.C., et al. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 2005, 52:207-215.
26. Heydorn S., Andersen K.E., Johansen J.D., Menne T. A stronger patch test elicitation reaction to the allergen hydroxycitronellal plus the irritant sodium laurylsulfate. Contact Dermatitis 2003, 49:133-139.
27. IKW, 2004. 7. Änderung der EG-Kosmetik-Richtlinie, Leitlinien.
28. IFRA, 2009. Code of Practice for the Fragrance Industry by the International Fragrance Association: http://www.ifraorg.org/.
29. Karlberg A.T., Shao L.P., Nilsson U., Gafvert E., Nilsson J.L. Hydroperoxides in oxidized d-limonene identified as potent contact allergens. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 1994, 286:97-103.
30. Klaschka U., Kolossa-Gehring M. Review article: fragrances in the environment: pleasant odours for nature?. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2007, 14(Special Issue 1):44-52.
31. Knacker T., Moltmann J.F., Liebig M. Environmental Risk Assessment of Human Pharmaceuticals, Hormones and Fragrances-A Challenge for Urban Water Management 2006, IWA Publishing. T. Ternes, A. Joss (Eds.).
32. Matura M., Skold M., Borje A., et al. Selected oxidized fragrance terpenes are common contact allergens. Contact Dermatitis 2005, 52:320-328.
33. McNamee P.M., Api A.M., Basketter D.A., Gerberick F.G., Gilpin D.A., Hall B.M., Jowsey J., Robinson M.K. A review of critical factors in the conduct and interpretation of the human repeat insult patch test. Reg. Tox. Pharmacol. 2008, 52:24-34.
34. Ministry of Food and Rural Area of Baden-Württemberg, 2005. Annual Report. Monitoring of Food, Consumer Goods, Cosmetics and Animal Food (in German).
35. Montforts M.H.M.M., de Knecht J.A. European medicines and feed additives regulation are not in compliance with environmental legislation and policy. Toxicol. Lett. 2002, 131:125-136.
36. Nardelli A., Carbonez A., Ottoy W., Drieghe J., Goossens A. Frequency of and trends in fragrance allergy over a 15-year period. Contact Dermatitis 2008, 58:134-141.
37. Noiesen E., Munk M.D., Larsen K., Johansen J.D., Agner T. Difficulties in avoiding exposure to allergens in cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis 2007, 57:105-109.
38. OECD, 2008. Expert Group on Sensitization Hazards, Draft Summary Record of the Expert Group Meeting on Sensitization, 10-11 March, 2008.
39. Park, M.V.D.Z., Janssen, P.C.J.M., van Raaij, M.T.M., 2006. Risk Assessment for Scented Products: A Pre-study RIVM Report 320105002/2006.
40. Pleschka S. Düfte: Emotionen und Allergien. Allergie konkret. 2007, 3:19-21.
41. Rastogi, S.C., Hellerup Jensen, G., Johansen, J.D., 2007a. Survey and Risk Assessment of Chemical Substances in Deodorants. Report Danish Ministry of the Environment, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Survey of Chemicals in Consumer Products, No 86.
42. Rastogi S.C., Johansen J.D., Menne T., Frosch P., Bruze M., Andersen K.E., Lepoittevin J.P., Wakelin S., White I.R. Contents of fragrance allergens in childrenós cosmetics and cosmetic toys. Contact Dermatitis 1999, 41:84-88.
43. Rastogi S.C., Johansen J.D. Significant exposures to isoeugenol derivates in perfumes. Contact Dermatitis 2008, 58:278-281.
44. Rastogi S.C., Johansen J.D., Bossi R. Selected important fragrance sensitizers in perfumes current exposures. Contact Dermatitis 2007, 56:201-204.
45. RIFM, 2009. http://www.rifm.org/.
46. Rohde N. Parfümerie zwischen Paragraphen, Ärzten und Verbrauchern. SÖFW-Journal 2001, 127(1):28-33.
47. SCCNFP, 1999. Opinion Concerning Fragrance Allergy in consumers. A Review of the Problem. Analysis of the Need for Appropriate Consumer Information and Identification of Consumer Allergens. SCCNFP 0017/98.
48. SCCNFP, 2000. Opinion Concerning the 1st update of the Inventory of Ingredients Employed in Cosmetic Products. Section II: Perfume and Aromatic Materials. SCCNFP/0389/00/Final.
49. SCCP, 2008. Opinion on Dermal Sensitisation Quantitative Risk Assessment (Citral, Farnesol and Phenylacetalehyde) 1153/08.
50. Scheinman P.L. Prevalence of fragrance allergy. Dermatology 2002, 205:98-102.
51. Schnuch A., Uter W., Geier J., Gefeller O. Epidemiology of contact allergy: an estimation of morbidity employing the clinical epidemiology and drug utilisation research (CE-DUR) approach. Contact Dermatitis 2002, 47:32-39.
52. Schnuch A., Lessmann H., Geier J., Frosch P.J., Uter W. Contact allergy to fragrances: frequencies of sensitization from 1996 to 2002. Results of the IVDK. Dermatitis 2004, 50(2):65-76.
53. Schnuch, A., Geier, J., Lessmann, H., Uter, W., 2004b. Untersuchungen zur Verbreitung von umweltbedingten Kontaktallergien mit Schwerpunkt im privaten Bereich. Ed. Umweltbundesamt, Berlin WaBoLu Hefte.
54. Schnuch A., Uter W., Geier J., Lessmann H., Frosch P. Sensitization to 26 allergens to be labelled according to current European regulation. Results of the IVDK and review of the literature. Contact Dermatitis 2007, 57:1-10.
55. Schnuch, A., Geier, J., Uter, W., Frosch, P.J., 2009. Majantol-A New Important Fragrance Allergen. https://interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/117986553/HTMLSTART.
56. Skold M., Hagvall L., Karlberg A.T. Autoxidation of linalyl acetate, the main component of lavender oil, creates potent contact allergens. Contact Dermatitis 2008, 58:9-14.
57. Straff, W., 2005. Anwendung von Duftstoffen. Was ist mit den Nebenwirkungen? Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz 12, 1400-1405. doi:10.007/s00103-005-1170-y.
58. Ternes T.A., Knacker T., Oehlmann J. Körperpflegemittel in der aquatischen Umwelt. Eine bisher vernachlässigte Stoffgruppe. UWSF-Z. Umweltchem. Ökotoxikol. 2003, 15:169-180.
59. Thyssen J.P., Linneberg A., Menne T., Johansen J.D. The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population-prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis 2007, 57:287-299.
60. Umweltbundesamt, 2004a. Press release 34/2004. Ein unterschätztes Problem: Umweltbedingte Kontaktallergien - Über fünf Millionen Bürgerinnen und Bürger betroffen.
61. Umweltbundesamt, 2004b. Press release 64/2004. Duftstoffe nicht wahllos einsetzen - UBA, Industrie und Verbände bei Kriterien einig: gesundheitliche Unbedenklichkeit, Umweltverträglichkeit und Rücksicht auf empfindliche Personen.
62. Umweltbundesamt, 2006. Background Document: Duftstoffe: Wenn Angenehmes zur Last werden kann.
63. Wijnhoven, S.W.P., Ezendam, J., Schuur, A.G., van Loveren, H., van Engelen, J.G.M., 2008. Allergens in Consumer Products RIVM Report 320025001.