The safety assessment of fragrance materials

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 218-273

  Bickers, David R ^a,j   Calow, Peter ^b   Greim, Helmut A ^c   Hanifin, Jon M ^d   Rogers, Adrianne E ^e   Saurat, Jean Hilaire ^f   Sipes, I Glenn ^g   Smith, Robert L ^h   Tagami, Hachiro ⁱ  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^d OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^g UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^h IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^j RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR FRAGRANCE MATERIALS   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETAL DERIVATIVE; ACETIC ACID DERIVATIVE; ACETOACETIC ACID DERIVATIVE; ALCOHOL DERIVATIVE; ALDEHYDE DERIVATIVE; AMINE; ANTHRANILIC ACID DERIVATIVE; BUTYRIC ACID DERIVATIVE; CARBOXYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; COSMETIC; COUMARIN DERIVATIVE; DIOXANE DERIVATIVE; EPOXIDE; ESTER DERIVATIVE; FORMIC ACID DERIVATIVE; FRAGRANCE; LINALOOL; LINALYLACETATE; LINALYLBENZOATE; LINALYLBUTYRATE; LINALYLCINNMATE; LINALYLFORMATE; LINALYLHEXANOATE; LINALYLISOBUTYRATE; LINALYLISOVALERATE; LINALYLPHENYLACETATE; LINALYLPROPIONATE; PHTHALIC ACID DERIVATIVE; SALICYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; UNINDEXED DRUG;

ACUTE TOXICITY; BIOSAFETY; CARCINOGENICITY; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; DATA ANALYSIS; DRUG EFFECT; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GENOTOXICITY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; IRRITANT DERMATITIS; MATERIALS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MUTAGENICITY; NONHUMAN; PHOTOALLERGY; PHOTOTOXICITY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN MANIFESTATION; SKIN SENSITIZATION; SKIN TOXICITY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TOXICITY; TOXICOKINETICS;

EID: 0037395707     PISSN: 02732300     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0273-2300(03)00003-5     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Adams T.B., Hallagan J.B., Putnam J.M., Gierte T.L., Doull J., Munro I.C., Newberne P.S., Portoghese P.S., Smith R.L., Wagner B.M., Weil C.S., Woods L.A., Ford R.A. The FEMA GRAS assessment of alicyclic substances used as flavor ingredients. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 34:1996;763-828.
2. Anders M.W. Biotransformation and bioactivation of xenobiotics by the kidney. Hutson D.H., Caldwell J., Paulson G.D. Intermediary Xenobiotic Metabolism in Animals. 1989;81-97 Taylor and Francis, New York.
3. Andersen, F.A. (Ed.), 2001. Safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients: forty-third report of the cosmetic ingredient review expert panel; Bergfeld, W.F., Belsito, D.V., Snyder, P.W., Klaassen, C.D., Schroeter, A.L., Shank, R.C., Slaga, T.J. International Journal of Toxicology 20(Suppl. 2), iii-85.
4. Andersen K.E., Johansen J.D., Bruze M., Frosch P.J., Goossens A., Lepoittevin J.-P., Rastogi S., White I., Menne T. The time-dose-response relationship for elicitation of contact dermatitis in isoeugenol allergic individuals. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 170:2001;166-171.
5. Api A.M. Sensitization methodology and primary prevention of the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. Dermatology. 205:2002;84-87.
6. Api, A.M., Ford, R.A., 1999. Photoallergenicity studies in humans with AHTN and HHCB. First Meeting of the Experimental Contact Dermatitis Research Group, Cincinnati, OH, May 20-22.
7. Balk F., Ford R.A. Environmental risk assessment for the polycyclic musks AHTN and HHCB in the EU.I. Fate and exposure assessment. Toxicology Letters. 111:1999;57-79.
8. Balk F., Ford R.A. Environmental risk assessment for the polycyclic musks, AHTN and HHCB. II. Effect assessment and risk characterization. Toxicology Letters. 111:1999;81-94.
9. Bickers, D., Greim, H., Hanifin, J.H., Rogers, A.E., Saurat, J.H., Sipes, I.G., Smith, R.L., Tagami, H., 2002. A toxicologic and dermatologic assessment of linalool and related esters when used as fragrance ingredients. Food and Chemical Toxicology, in press.
10. Chadha A., Madyastha K.M. Metabolism of geraniol and linalool in the rat and effects on liver and lung microsomal enzymes. Xenobiotica. 14:1984;365-374.
11. Cramer G.M., Ford R.A. Estimation of toxic hazard - a decision tree approach. Food and Cosmetics Toxicology. 16:1978;255-276.
12. Draize J.H., Woodard G., Calvery H.O. Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substance applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 82(2):1944;377-390.
13. European Commission, 1996. Technical Guidance Document in support of Directive 96/67/EEC on risk assessment of new notified substances and Regulation (EC) No. 1488/94 on risk assessment of existing substances (Parts I, II, III, and IV). EC catalogue numbers CR 48-96-001, 002, 003, 004-EN-C.
14. Federle, T.W., Langworthy, D.E., Itrich, N.R., Simonich, S.L., 2000. Biotransformation of the polycyclic musk, HHCB, in activated sludge and river water. Third SETAC World Congress, 10th Annual SETAC Europe, Brighton, United Kingdom, May 21-25.
15. Fenn R.S. Aroma chemical usage trends in modern perfumery. Perfumer and Flavorist. 14:1989;3-10.
16. Ford R.A., Api A.M., Hawkins D.R. Absorption, distribution and excretion of topical doses of 14C-phenylethyl alcohol (PEA). The Toxicologist. 7(1):1987;237.
17. Ford R.A. The Toxicology and Safety of Fragrances. Muller P.M. Perfumes: Art, Science and Technology. 1991;441-463 Elsevier, Amsterdam.
18. Ford R.A., Domeyer B., Easterday O., Maier K., Middleton J. Criteria for development of a database for safety evaluation of fragrance ingredients. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 31:2000;155-181.
19. 14C]coumarin by rats and by human volunteers under simulated conditions of use in fragrances. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 39:2001;153-162.
20. Gerberick G.F., Robinson M.K., Felter S.P., White I.R., Basketter D.A. Understanding fragrance allergy using an exposure-based risk assessment approach. Contact Dermatitis. 45(6):2001;333-340.
21. Hanifin, J.M., Bickers, D.R., 1999. Considerations for testing irritancy, allergy and photoreactivity in fragrance safety evaluations, First Meeting of the Experimental Contact Dermatitis Research Group, Cincinnati, OH, May 20-22.
22. Hawkins D.R., Ford R.A. Dermal absorption and distribution of musk ambrette, musk ketone and musk xylene in rats. Toxicology Letters. 111:1999;95-103.
23. Hawkins D.R., Elsom L.F., Kirkpatrick D., Ford R.A., Api A.M. Dermal absorption and distribution of musk ambrette, musk ketone and musk xylene in human subjects. Toxicology Letters. 131:2002;147-151.
24. Heymann E. Carboxylesterases and amidases. Jakoby W.B. Enzymatic Basis of Detoxication. 1980;291-323 Academic Press, New York.
25. Hotchkiss, S.A.M., 1998. Absorption of fragrance ingredients using in vitro models with human skin. In: Fragrances: Beneficial and Adverse Effects, 125-135.
26. Hotchkiss S.A.M., Miller J.M., Caldwell J. Percutaneous absorption of benzyl acetate through rat skin in vitro 2. Effect of vehicle and occlusion. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 30:1992;145-153.
27. IFRA, 1980. Code of Practice, International Fragrance Association, Geneva, October. (Current versions are available at http://www.ifraorg.org ).
28. Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives, 1999. Safety evaluation of certain food additives. Who Food Additives Series: 42. Prepared by the Fifty-first meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). World Health Organization, Geneva 1999.
29. Kaidbey K.H., Kligman A.M. Photomaximization test for identifying photoallergen contact sensitizers. Contact Dermatitis. 6:1980;161-169.
30. Kimber I., Gerberick G.F., Basketter D.A. Thresholds in contact sensitization: theoretical and practical considerations. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 37:1999;553-560.
31. Kligman A.M. The identification of contact allergens by human assay. III. The maximization test: a procedure for screening and rating sensitizers. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 47(5):1966;393-409.
32. Kligman A.M., Epstein W. Updating the maximization test for identifying contact allergens. Contact Dermatitis. 1:1975;231-239.
33. Langworthy, D.E., Itrich, N.R., Federle, T.W., 2000. Biotransformation of mineralisation of acetyl cedrene in activated sludge and river water. Third SETAC World Congress, 10th Annual SETAC Europe, Brighton, United Kingdom, May 21-25.
34. Letizia C.S., Cocchiara J., Wellington G.A., Funk C., Api A.M. Special issue IX: monographs on fragrance raw materials. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 38(Suppl.):2000;236.
35. Morikawa F., Nakayama Y., Fukuda M., Hamano M., Yokoyama Y., Nagura T., Ishihara M., Toda K. Techniques for evaluation of phototoxicity and photoallergy in laboratory animals and man. Fitzpatrick T.B., Pathak M.A., Harber L.C., Seiji M., Kukita A. Sunlight and Man: Normal and Abnormal Photobiologic Responses. 1974;529-557 University Tokyo Press, Tokyo.
36. Naldi L. The epidemiology of fragrance allergy: questions and needs. Dermatology. 205:2002;89-97.
37. Opdyke D.L.J., Letizia C.S. Monographs on fragrance raw materials, fig leaf absolute. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 20(Suppl.):1982;691-692.
38. Opdyke, D.L., 1984. The RIFM Story. In: The Cosmetic Industry, 231-243 (Chapter 14).
39. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1998. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. 2, rue Andre-Pascal, 75775 Paris, Cedex 16, France.
40. Parke D.V., Rahman K.H.M.Q., Walker R. Effect of linalool on hepatic drug-metabolizing enzymes in the rat. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2:1974;615-618.
41. Pathak M.A., Fitzpatrick T.B. Relationship of molecular configuration to the activity of furocoumarins which increase the cutaneous responses following long wave ultraviolet radiation. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 32(Part 2):1959;255-262.
42. Potter J., Smith R.L., Api A.M. Urinary thiocyanate levels as a biomarker for the generation of inorganic cyanide from benzyl cyanide in the rat. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 39(2):2001;141-146.
43. Potter J., Smith R.L., Api A.M. An assessment of the release of inorganic cyanide form the fragrance materials benzyl cyanide geranyl nitrile and citronellyl nitrile applied dermally to the rat. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 39(2):2001;147-151.
44. Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc., 2002. Topical photoallergy screening test of cinnamaldehyde and cinnamic acid in male albino hairless guinea pigs, including primary irritation, phototoxicity and contact hypersensitivity evaluations. RIFM Audited Draft Final Report, 20 June.
45. RIFM, 1980. Advisory Letter to Membership, Number 29, February 11.
46. Robinson M.K., Gerberick G.F., Ryan C.A., McNamee P., White I.R., Basketter D.A. The importance of exposure estimation in the assessment of skin sensitization risk. Contact Dermatitis. 42:2000;251-259.
47. Salvito D.T., Senna R.J., Federle T.W. A framework for prioritizing fragrance materials for aquatic risk assessment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 21:2002;1301-1308.
48. Sams N.M. Jr., Epstein J.H. Experimental production of drug phototoxicity in guinea pigs, using sunlight. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 48:1967;89-94.
49. Schreiber, W.L., 1996. Perfumes, Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, fourth ed., vol. 18, pp. 172-201.
50. Spielmann H., Balls M., Dupuis J., Pape W.J., Pechovity G., DeSilva O., Holzhutter H.G., Clothier R., Desolle P., Gerberick F., Lovell W.W., Maurer T., Pfannenbecker U., Potthast J.M., Csato M., Sladowski D., Steiling W., Brantom P. The international EU/COLIPA invitro phototoxicity validation study: results of phase II (Blind Trial). Part 1. The 3T3 phototoxicity test. Toxicology In Vitro. 12(3):1998;305-327.
51. Tas J.W., Balk F., Ford R.A., van de Plassche E.J. Environmental risk assessment of musk ketone and musk xylene in the Netherlands in accordance with the EU-TGD. Chemosphere. 35:1997;29783-30002.