Fragrances in the environment: Pleasant odours for nature?

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Volumn 14, Issue 1 SPEC. ISS., 2007, Pages 44-52

  Klaschka, Ursula ^a   Kolossa Gehring, Marike ^b  

^a ULM UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b UMWELTBUNDESAMT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Behaviour; Bioactive compounds; Ecotoxicology; Environmental risk assessment; Fragrance industry; Fragrance ingredients; Odour; Perfume; REACh; Regulations; Sense of smell; Signal substances

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL FATE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; LEGISLATION; ODOR; POLLUTANT SOURCE; REPRODUCTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; WASTEWATER;

EID: 34248372081     PISSN: 09441344     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1065/espr2007.01.380     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Ashford NA (1991): Chemical Exposures: Low levels and high stakes. Library of Congress
2. Ashford NA, Miller CS (1998): Low-level chemical exposures: A challenge for Science and Policy. Environmental Science and Technology Nov. 1, 508f
3. Atzmüller M, Grammer K (2000): Biologie des Geruchs: Die Bedeutung von Pheromonen für Verhalten und Reproduktion. Speculum 18 (1) 12-18
4. BEUC (2005) Bureau Européen des Unions de Consommateurs: Emission of chemicals by air fresheners. Tests on 74 consumer products sold in Europe
5. Bickers DR, Calow P, Greim HA, Hanifin JM, Rogers AE, Saurat J-H, Sipes IG, Smith RL, Tagami H (2003): The safety assessment of fragrance materials. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 37, 218-273
6. Bunke D, Schneider K, Jäger I (2005): Konkretisierungen der Waiving Bedingungen im Rahmen des Registrierungsverfahrens nach REACH. Projektbericht, 〈www.oeko.de〉
7. Cadby PA, Troy WR, Vey MGH (2002): Consumer exposure to fragrance ingredients: Providing estimates for safety evaluation. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 36, 246-252
8. CEC (2003): Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency and amending Directive 1999/45/EC and Regulation (EC) on Persistent Organic Pollutants COM 2003/644. Brussels
9. CEC (2006): Common position adopted by the Council with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC, 〈http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/de/06/ st07/st07524.de06.pdf〉
10. Daughton CG, Ternes T (1999): Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment. Agents of subtle changes? Environmental Health Perspectives 107, 907-938
11. Daughton CG, Jones-Lepp TL (2001): Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment. Scientific and regulatory issues. ACS Symposium Series 791, American Chemical Society, Washington DC
12. EAPCCT/COLIPA (2000): European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists / European Cosmetic Toiletry and Perfumery Association. Cosmetic Frame Formulations, (available on request at COLIPA in Brussels)
13. EC (1996): Commission Decision 96/335/EC of 8 May 1996 establishing an inventory and a common nomenclature of ingredients employed in cosmetic products. Official Journal L 132, 01/06/1996, pp 1-684
14. EC (2003): Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment in support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for new notified substances, Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for existing substances and Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market, Parts I, II and IV. European Communities, EUR 20418 EN/1
15. EEC (1967): Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. Official Journal p. 196, 16/8/1967, as amended by Commission Directive 2001/59/EC of 6 August 2001 adapting to technical progress for the 28th time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. Official Journal L 225, 12/8/2001
16. EEC (1976): Council Directive 76/768/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products. Official Journal L 262, 27/09/1976, pp 169-200
17. EEC (1999): Council Directive 1999/45/EC concerning the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous preparations. Off J L 200, 68
18. EEC (2003): Council Directive 2003/15/EC amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products. Off J 66, 26-35
19. European Chemicals Bureau (2006): 〈http://ecb.jrc.it〉
20. European Commission (2002): Endocrine Disruptors: Study on gathering information on 435 substances with insufficient data, European Commission, DG ENV, Final Report, RPS-BKH Report
21. EWG, Environmental working group, executive summary(2005): 〈http://www.ewg.org〉
22. Harborne JB (1993): Introduction to ecological biochemistry. London Academic Press
23. Hadorn E, Wehner R (1978): Allgemeine Zoologie. Thieme Stuttgart. 286ff
24. International Fragrance Association (IFRA) (2006): Code of Practice for the Fragrance Industry, 〈http://www.ifia.org〉
25. Käfferlein HU, Angerer J (2001): Trends in the musk xylene concentration in plasma samples from the general population from 1992/1993 to 1998 and the relevance of dermal uptake. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 74, 470-476
26. Kallenborn R, Gatermann R, Planting S, Rimkus GG, Lund M (1999): Gas chromatic determination of synthetic musk compounds in Norwegian air samples. Journal of Chromatography A 846, 295-306
27. nd edition, Springer, pp 411-428
28. Klaschka U, Liebig M, Knacker T (2007): Ecolabeling of Shampoos, Shower Gels and Foam Baths. Env Sci Pollut Res 14 (1) 24-29
29. Knacker T, Moltmann JF, Liebig M (in press): Environmental Risk Assessment in Human Pharmaceuticals, Hormons nd Fragrances - A Challenge for Urban Water Management. Ternes T, Joss A (eds), IWA Publishing
30. Larcher W (1995): Physiological Plant Ecology. Ecophysiology and Stress Physiology of Functional Groups. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York
31. Liebl B, Mayer R, Ommer S, Sönnichsen C, Koletzko B (2000): Transition of nitro musks and polycyclic musks into human milk. Adv Exp Med Biol 478, 289-305
32. Müller K (2004): Toxikologische Absicherung von Parfümö len: Die Sicht der Anwender. Presentation in Frankfurt at the SEPAWA Conference 23.11.04
33. Neuhaus EM, Gisselmann G, Zhang W, Dooley R, Störtkuhl K, Hatt H (2004): Odour receptor heterodimerization in the olfactory system of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature Neuroscience 8, 15-17
34. Ono M, Terabe H, Hori H, Sasaki M (2003): Components of giant hornet alarm pheromone. Nature (424) 637-638
35. OSPAR Commission (2004): Musk xylene and other musks. OSPAR Background document on Musk Xylene and other musks. Hazardous Substances Series
36. Pichersky E (2004): Plant Scents. What we perceive as a fragrant perfume is actually a sophisticated tool used to entice pollinators, discourage microbes and fend off predators. American Scientist 92, 514-521
37. Polya G (2003): Biochemical Targets of Plant Bioactive Compounds. A pharmacological reference guide to sites of action and biological effects. Taylor and Francis, London and New York
38. Research Institute for Fragrance Materials (RIFM) (2006): 〈http://www.rifm.org〉
39. Riechstoffverband (2006): 〈http://www.riechstoffverband.de〉
40. Rohde N (2001): Parfümerie zwischen Paragraphen, Ärzten und Verbrauchern. SÖFW-Journal 127 (1) 28-33
41. Salvito DT, Senn RJ, Federle TW (2001): A framework for prioritizing fragrance materials for aquatic risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 21 (6) 1301-1308
42. Salvito DT, Vey MGH, Senna RJ (2004): Fragrance materials and their environmental impact. Flavour Fragr J 19, 105-108
43. st update of the inventory of ingredients employed in cosmetic products. Section II: Perfume and aromatic materials. SCCNFP/0389/00/Final
44. SCHER (2006): Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks: Opinion on the report 'Emission of chemicals by air fresheners. Tests on 74 consumer products sold in Europe'
45. Schiestl FP, Ayasse M (2000): Post-mating odor in females of the solitary bee, Andrena nigroaenea (Apoidea, Andrenidae), inhibits male mating behavior. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48, 303-307
46. Schiestl FP, Ayasse M (2001): Post-pollination emission of a repellent compound in a sexually deceptive orchid: a new mechanism for maximising reproductive success? Oecologia 126, 531-534
47. Schiffman SS, Williams CM (2005): Science of odor as a potential health issue. J Environ Qual 34, 129-138
48. Schnuch A, Lessmann H, Geier J, Frosch PJ, Uter W (2004a): Contact allergy to fragrances: frequencies of sensitization from 1996 to 2002. Results of the IVDK. Dermatitis 50 (2) 65-76
49. Schnuch A, Geier J, Lessmann H, Uter W (2004b): Untersuchungen zur Verbreitung von umweltbedingten Kontaktallergien mit Schwerpunkt im privaten Bereich. Ed Umweltbundesamt. Berlin WaBoLu Hefte
50. Shiojiri K, Ozawa R, Takabayashi J (2006): Plant Volatiles, Rather than Light, Determine the Nocturnal Behavior of a Caterpillar. PloS Biology (4) 6
51. Simonich SL, Begley WM Debaere G, Eckhoff W (2000): Trace Analysis of Fragrance Materials in Wastewater and treated Wastewater. Environ Sci Technol 34, 959-965
52. Simonich SL, Federle TW, Eckhoff WS, Rottiers A, Webb S, Sabaliundas D, De Wolf W (2002): Removal of fragrance Materials during U.S. and European Wastewater Treatment. Environ Sci Technol (36) 2839-2847
53. Siol A (2003): Synthetische Moschusduftstoffe: eine multidimensionale Bewertung ihres Risikos für die Umwelt am Beispiel ausgewählter Leitchemikalien. Dissertation. Verlag im Internet GmbH, 〈http://dnb.ddb. de〉
54. Smulders E (2002): Laundry Detergents. Wiley VCH
55. Spehr M, Gisselmann G, Poplawski A (2003): Identification of a testicular odorant receptor, mediating human sperm Chemotaxis. Science 299, 2054-2058
56. Spehr M, Schwane K, Heimann S, Gisselmann G, Hummel T, Hatt H (2004): Dual Capacity of a Human Olfactory Receptor. Curr Biol 14 (19) 832-833
57. Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland - Federal Statistical Office Germany (2005): 〈http://www.destatis.de〉
58. Straff W (2005): Anwendung von Duftstoffen. Was ist mit den Nebenwirkungen? Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforsch - Gesundheitsschutz 12, 1400-1405
59. Swedish Society for Nature Conservation/Foundations concerning criteria for Bra Mijöval (2000): Fragrances. Draft for public hearing
60. Ternes TA, Knacker T, Oehlmann J (2003): Körperpflegemittel in der aquatischen Umwelt. Eine bisher vernachlässigte Stoffgruppe. UWSF - Z Umweltchem Ökotox 15, 169-180
61. Umweltbundesamt (2004a): Press release 34/2004: Ein unterschätztes Problem: Umweltbedingte Kontaktallergien - Über fünf Millionen Bürgerinnen und Bürger betroffen
62. Umweltbundesamt (2004b): Press release 64/2004: Duftstoffe nicht wahllos einsetzen - UBA, Industrie und Verbände bei Kriterien einig: gesundheitliche Unbedenklichkeit, Umweltverträglichkeit und Rücksicht auf empfindliche Personen
63. Umweltbundesamt (2006): Background Document: Duftstoffe: Wenn Angenehmes zur Last werden kann
64. Van Toller S, Dodd GH (eds) (1992): Fragrance: The psychology and biology of perfumes. Elsevier Science Publishers, pp 137ff
65. Young JM, Trask BJ (2002): The sense of smell: genomics of vertebrate odorant receptors. Hum Mol Genet 11, 1153-11607