Supreme Court litigants and strategic framing

American Journal of Political Science

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 617-631

  Wedeking, Justin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954851197     PISSN: 00925853     EISSN: 15405907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00450.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Bailey Michale, Kamoie Brian, Maltzman Forrest. Signals from the 10th Justice: The Political Role of the Solicitor General in Supreme Court Decision Making. American Journal of Political Science 2005, 49(1):72-85.
2. Baumgartner Frank R, De Boef Suzanna L, Boydstun Amber E. The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence 2008, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
3. Bonneau Chris W, Hammond Thomas H, Maltzman Forrest, Wahlbeck Paul J. Agenda Control, the Median Justice, and the Majority Opinion on the U.S. Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science 2007, 51(4):890-905.
4. Caldeira Gregory A, Wright Jack R. The Discuss List: Agenda Building in the Supreme Court. Law & Society Review 1990, 24(3):807-36.
5. Chong Dennis, Druckman James N. Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies. American Political Science Review 2007a, 101(4):637-55.
6. Chong Dennis, Druckman James N. Framing Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 2007b, 10(1):103-26.
7. Corley Pamela C. The Supreme Court and Opinion Content: The Influence of Parties' Briefs. Political Research Quarterly 2008, 61(3):468-78.
8. Corman Steven R, Kuhn Timothy, McPhee Robert D, Dooley Kevin J. Studying Complex Discursive Systems: Centering Resonance Analysis of Communication. Human Communication Research 2002, 28(2):157-206.
9. Druckman James N. The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence. Political Behavior 2001a, 23(3):225-56.
10. Druckman James N. On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame. Journal of Politics 2001b, 63(4):1041-66.
11. Druckman James N, Nelson Kjersten R. Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens' Conversations Limit Elite Influence. American Journal of Political Science 2003, 47(4):729-45.
12. Edwards Linda Holdeman. Legal Writing: Process, Analysis, and Organization 1999, Gaithersburg, NY, Aspen Law & Business
13. Entman Robert M. Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication 1993, 43(4):51-58.
14. Epstein Lee, Kobylka Joseph F. The Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty 1992, Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press
15. Epstein Lee, Knight Jack. The Choices Justices Make 1998, Washington, DC, CQ Press
16. Epstein Lee, Segal Jeffrey A, Johnson Timothy R. The Claim of Issue Creation on the U.S. Supreme Court. American Political Science Review 1996, 90(4):845-52.
17. Epstein Lee, Segal Jeffrey A, Spaeth Harold J, Walker Thomas G. The Supreme Court Compendium 2007, 4th ed, Washington, DC, CQ Press
18. Epstein Lee, Shvetsova Olga. Heresthetical Maneuvering on the U.S. Supreme Court. Journal of Theoretical Politics 2002, 14(1):93-122.
19. Evans Michael, McIntosh Wayne, Lin Jimmy, Cates Cynthia. Recounting the Courts? Applying Automated Content Analysis to Enhance Empirical Legal Research. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 2007, 4(4):1007-39.
20. Gamson William A. Foreword. Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World 2001, ix-xi. Reese Stephen DGandy Oscar HGrant August E. In, ed, London, Lawrence Erlbaum
21. Gamson William A, Modigliani Andre. The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action. Research in Political Sociology 1987, Vol. 3:137-77. Braungart Richard D, In, ed, Greenwich, CT, JAI
22. Gibson James L. United States Supreme Court Judicial Data Base-Phase II: 1953-1993 1997, Ann Arbor, MI, Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research
23. Guthrie Chris, Rachlinski Jeffrey J, Wistrich Andrew J. Inside the Judicial Mind. Cornell Law Review 2001, 86:777-830.
24. Hansford Thomas, Spriggs James. The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court 2006, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press
25. Jerit Jennifer. Reform, Rescue, or Run Out of Money? Problem Definition in the Social Security Reform Debate. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 2006, 11(1):9-28.
26. Jerit Jennifer. Issue Framing and Engagement: Rhetorical Strategy in Public Policy Debates. Political Behavior 2008, 30(1):1-24.
27. Johnson Timothy R. Oral Arguments and Decision Making on the United States Supreme Court 2004, Albany, State University of New York Press
28. Johnson Timothy R, Wahlbeck Paul J, Spriggs James F. The Influence of Oral Arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court. American Political Science Review 2006, 100(1):99-113.
29. King Gary, Tomz Michael, Wittenberg Jason. Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation. American Journal of Political Science 2000, 44(2):341-55.
30. Martin Andrew D, Quinn Kevin M. Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953-1999. Political Analysis 2002, 10(2):134-53.
31. McAtee Andrea, McGuire Kevin T. Lawyers, Justices, and Issue Salience: When and How Legal Arguments Affect the Supreme Court. Law & Society Review 2007, 41(2):259-78.
32. McGuire Kevin T. Lawyers and the U.S. Supreme Court: The Washington Community and Legal Elites. American Journal of Political Science 1993, 37(2):365-90.
33. McGuire Kevin T. Repeat Players in the Supreme Court: The Role of Experienced Lawyers in Litigation Success. The Journal of Politics 1995, 57(1):187-96.
34. Nelson Thomas E, Oxley Zoe M, Clawson Rosalee A. Toward a Psychology of Framing Effects. Political Behavior 1997, 19(3):221-46.
35. Palmer Jan. An Econometric Analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court's Certiorari Decisions. Public Choice 1982, 39(3):387-98.
36. Peffley Mark, Hurwitz Jon. Persuasion and Resistance: Race and the Death Penalty in America. American Journal of Political Science 2007, 51(4):996-1012.
37. Petrocik John R. Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study. American Journal of Political Science 1996, 40(3):825-50.
38. Provine Doris Marie. Case Selection in the United States Supreme Court 1980, Chicago, University of Chicago Press
39. Richards Mark J, Kritzer Herbert. Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making. American Political Science Review 2002, 96(2):305-20.
40. Riker William H. The Art of Political Manipulation 1986, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press
41. Riker William H. Heresthetic and Rhetoric in the Spatial Model. Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting 1990, 46-65. Enelow James MHinich Melvin J. In, ed, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
42. Riker William H. The Strategy of Rhetoric: Campaigning for the American Constitution 1996, Calvert RandallMueller JohnWilson Rick. Ed, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press
43. Sheehan Reginald S, Mishler William, Songer Donald R. Ideology, Status, and the Differential Success of Direct Parties before the Supreme Court. American Political Science Review 1992, 86(2):464-71.
44. Sigelman Lee, Buell Emmett H. Avoidance or Engagement? Issue Convergence in Presidential Campaigns, 1960-2000. American Journal of Political Science 2004, 48(4):650-61.
45. Simon Adam F, Xenos Michael. Dimensional Reduction of Word-Frequency Data as a Substitute for Intersubjective Content Analysis. Political Analysis 2004, 12(1):63-75.
46. Sniderman Paul M, Theriault Sean M. The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing. Studies in Public Opinion 2004, 133-65. Saris William, Sniderman Paul. In, ed, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press
47. Sokol Ronald P. Language and Litigation: A Portrait of the Appellate Brief 1967, Charlottesville, VA, The Michie Company
48. Spaeth Harold J. Expanded Burger Court Judicial Database (1969-1985 Terms). Housed at South Carolina. 2007, http://www.cas.sc.edu/poli/juri/burger_codebook.pdf
49. Spaeth Harold J. Original United States Supreme Court Judicial Database. 2008, http://www.cas.sc.edu/poli/juri/allcourt_codebook.pdf, Housed at the University of South Carolina
50. Tannen Deborah. What's in a Frame? Surface Evidence for Underlying Expectations. Framing in Discourse 1993, 14-56. Tannen Deborah. In, ed, New York, Oxford University Press
51. Teply Larry L. Legal Writing, Analysis, and Oral Argument 1990, St. Paul, MN, American Casebook Series, WEST
52. Wahlbeck Paul. The Life of the Law: Judicial Politics and Legal Change. Journal of Politics 1997, 59(3):778-802.
53. Wahlbeck Paul J, Spriggs James F, Sigelman Lee. Ghostwriters on the Court? A Stylistic Analysis of Opinion Drafts. American Politics Research 2002, 30(2):166-92.
54. Zaller John R. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion 1992, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press