The importance of multiple performance criteria for understanding trust in risk managers

Risk Analysis

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1099-1115

  Johnson, Branden B ^a   White, Mathew P ^b  

^a University of Plymouth ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Brownfields; drinking water standards; performance criteria; trust

Indexed keywords

BROWNFIELDS; CONTAMINATED LANDS; COST CONTROLS; DRINKING WATER STANDARDS; ECONOMIC IMPROVEMENTS; GOVERNMENT AGENCIES; MULTIPLE CRITERIA; PERFORMANCE CRITERION; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLIC TRUST; RISK MANAGER;

COST EFFECTIVENESS; HEALTH RISKS; MANAGERS; RISK MANAGEMENT; STANDARDS; TARGETS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WATER SUPPLY;

POTABLE WATER;

BROWNFIELD SITE; CONTAMINATED LAND; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DRINKING WATER; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; PERCEPTION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; REDEVELOPMENT; RESEARCH WORK; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC HEALTH; RISK MANAGEMENT; STANDARD; TRUST; UNITED STATES; WATER SUPPLY; STANDARDS;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; GOVERNMENT AGENCIES; HUMANS; NEW JERSEY; PUBLIC HEALTH; RISK MANAGEMENT; TRUST; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 77954728889     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01405.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Slovic P. Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis, 1993 13 : 675 682.
2. Earle TC, Cvetkovich G. Social Trust: Towards a Cosmopolitan Society.
3. Johnson BB. Exploring dimensionality in the origin of hazard-related trust. Journal of Risk Research, 1999 2 : 325 354.
4. Jungermann H, Pfister H-R, Fischer K. Credibility, information preferences, and information interests. Risk Analysis, 1996 16 : 251 261.
5. Priest SH, Bonfadelli H, Rusanen M. The "trust gap" hypothesis: Predicting support for biotechnology across national cultures as a function of trust in actors. Risk Analysis, 2003 23 : 751 766.
6. Eiser JR, Stafford T, Henneberry J, Catney P Trust me, I'm a scientist (not a developer)": Perceived expertise and motives as predictors of trust in assessment of risk from contaminated land. Risk Analysis, 2009 29 : 288 297.
7. Metlay D. Institutional trust and confidence: A journey into a conceptual quagmire. Chapter 8 in Cvetkovich GT, Löfstedt RE (eds). Social Trust and the Management of Risk.
8. Kramer RM. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 1999 50 : 569 598.
9. Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF. Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Analysis, 2003 23 : 961 972.
10. White MP, Eiser JR. Marginal trust in risk managers: Building and losing trust following decisions under uncertainty. Risk Analysis, 2006 26 : 1187 1203.
11. Johnson BB. Getting out of the swamp: Toward understanding sources of trust in wetlands management. Chapter 10 in Siegrist M, Earle TC, Gutscher H (eds). Trust in Cooperative Risk Management: Uncertainty and Scepticism in the Public Mind.
12. White MP, Eiser JR. A social judgement analysis of trust: People as intuitive detection theorists. Chapter 4 in Siegrist M, Earle TC, Gutscher H (eds). Trust in Cooperative Risk Management: Uncertainty and Scepticism in the Public Mind.
13. Conchie SM, Burns C. Trust and risk communication in high-risk organizations: A test of principles from social risk research. Risk Analysis, 2008 28 : 141 149.
14. Kim PH, Ferrin DL, Cooper CD, Dirks K. Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004 89 : 104 118.
15. Siegrist M, Earle TC, Gutscher H. Test of a trust and confidence model in the applied context of electromagnetic field (EMF) risks. Risk Analysis, 2003 23 : 705 716.
16. Mitchell JV. Perception of risk and credibility at toxic sites. Risk Analysis, 1992 12 : 19 26.
17. Flynn J, Slovic P, Mertz CK. Decidedly different: Expert and public views of risks from a radioactive waste repository. Risk Analysis, 1993 13 : 643 648.
18. Hardin R. The street-level epistemology of trust. Analyse und Kritik, 1992 14 : 152 176.
19. Hardin R. Trust and Trustworthiness.
20. O'Neill O. A Question of Trust.
21. Gabarro JJ. The development of trust, influence and expectations. In Athos T, Gabarro JJ (eds). Interpersonal Behavior: Communication and Understanding in Relationships, 290-303.
22. Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 1995 20 : 709 734.
23. Lewicki RJ, McAllister DJ, Bies RJ. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 1998 23 : 438 458.
24. Eagly AH, Chaiken S. The Psychology of Attitudes.
25. Saunders MNK, Thornhill A. Trust and mistrust in organizations: An exploration using an organizational justice framework. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2004 13 : 493 515.
26. Saunders MNK, Thornhill A, Evans C. Conceptualising trust and distrust and the role of boundaries: An organisationally based exploration.
27. Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF. Trust in risk regulation: Cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food? Risk Analysis, 2005 25 : 199 209.
28. Midden CJH, Huijts NMA. The role of trust in the affective evaluation of novel risks: The case of CO2 storage. Risk Analysis, 2009 29 : 743 751.
29. Meijnders A, Midden C, Olofsson A, Ohman S, Matthes J, Bondarenko O, Gutteling J, Rusanen M. The role of similarity cues in the development of trust in sources of information about GM food. Risk Analysis, 2009 29 : 1116 1128.
30. Levine AG. Love Canal: Science, Politics and People. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1982.
31. Hurd RE. Consumer Attitude Survey Update.
32. Johnson BB. Trust judgements in complex hazard management systems: The potential role of concepts of the system. Chapter 5 in Cvetkovich G, Löfstedt R (eds). Social Trust and the Management of Risk.
33. Batson CD. Why act for the public good? Four answers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1994 20 : 603 610.
34. Forehand M, Grier S. When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer skepticism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2003 13 : 349 356.
35. Funk CL. The dual influence of self-interest and societal interest in public opinion. Political Research Quarterly, 2000 53 : 37 62.
36. Terwel BW, Harinck F, Ellemers N, Daamen DDL. How organizational motives and communications affect public trust in organizations: The case of carbon dioxide capture and storage. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2009 29 : 290 299.
37. Catney P, Henneberry J, Meadowcroft J, Eiser JR. Dealing with contaminated land in the UK through "development managerialism". Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 2006 8 : 331 356.
38. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics (3rd ed).
39. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
40. Johnson BB. Public views on health standards as risk indicators. Risk Analysis, 2008 28 : 1515 1530.
41. Davidson DJ, Freudenberg WR. Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research. Environment and Behavior, 1996 28 : 302 339.
42. Kraus N, Malmfors T, Slovic P. Intuitive toxicology: Expert and lay judgments of chemical risks. Risk Analysis, 1992 12 : 215 232.
43. Blocker TJ, Eckberg DL. Environmental issues as women's issues: General concerns and local hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 1989 70 : 586 593.