Language in action: Psychological models of conversation

Language in Action: Psychological Models of Conversation

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-240

  Turnbull, William ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917258176     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203360859     Document Type: Book

References (171)

1. Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.
2. Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. C. (Eds.) (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Baker, G. P., & Hacker, P. M. S. (1984). Language sense and nonsense: A critical investigation into modern theories of language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
5. Baxter, L. A. (1984). An investigation of compliance gaining as politeness. Human Communication Research, 10, 427-456.
6. Bem, D. J., & McConnell, H. K. (1970). Testing the self-perception explanation of dissonance phenomena: On the salience of premanipulation attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 23-31.
7. Billig, M. (1999). Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse & Society, 10, 543-582.
8. Bilmes, J. (1988a). Category and rule in conversation analysis. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics, 2, 25-59.
9. Bilmes, J. (1988b). The concept of preference in conversation analysis. Language in Society, 17, 161-181.
10. Bilmes, J. (1992). Mishearings. In G. Watson & R. M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology (pp. 79-98). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
11. Blum-Kulka, S. (1992). The metapragmatics of politeness in Israeli society. In R. Watts, R. J. Ide, & S. Ehlich (Eds.), Politeness in language: Studies in its history (pp. 255-281). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
12. Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
13. Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 964-980.
14. Brehm, S. S., Miller, R. S., Perlman, D., & Campbell, S. M. (2001). Intimate relationships. New York: McGraw Hill.
15. Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Brown, P. (1995). Politeness strategies and the attribution of intention: the case of Tzeltal irony. In E. N. Goody (Ed.), Social intelligence and interaction: Expressions and implications of the social bias in human intelligence (pp. 153-174). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1989). Politeness theory and Shakespeare's four major tragedies. Language in Society, 18, 159-212.
19. Budwig, N. (1995). A developmental-functionalist approach to child language. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Button, G., Coulter, J., Lee, J. R. E., & Sharrock, W. (1995). Computers, minds and conduct. Cambridge: Polity Press.
21. Cahn, D. D. (1990). Intimates in conflict: A research review. In D. D. Cahn (Ed.), Intimates in conflict: A communication perspective (pp. 1-22). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Canfield, J. V. (1993). The living language: Wittgenstein and the empirical study of communication. Language Sciences, 15, 165-193.
23. Cervantes, C. A., & Callanan, M. A. (1998). Labels and explanations in mother- child emotion talk: Age and gender differentiation. Developmental Psychology, 34, 88-98.
24. Chapman, M. (1987). Inner processes and outward criteria: Wittgenstein's importance for psychology. In M. Chapman & R. A. Dixon (Eds.), Meaning and the growth of understanding: Wittgenstein's significance for Developmental Psychology (pp. 103-127). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
25. Chapman, M. (1988). Contextuality and directionality of cognitive development. Human Development, 31, 92-106.
26. Chapman, M. (1999). Constructivism and the problem of reality. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 20, 31-43.
27. Cherry, R. D. (1988). Politeness in written persuasion. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 63-81.
28. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
29. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of a theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Chomsky, N. (1968). Language and mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, Inc.
31. Clark, H. H. (1992). Arenas of language use. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1987). Collaborating on contributions to conversations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 19-41.
34. Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1992). Dealing with overhearers. In H. H. Clark (Ed.), Arenas of language use (pp. 248-297). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35. Djik, T. A. van (Ed.) (1997). Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction: Vol. 2. Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage.
36. Drew, P. (1995). Interaction sequences and anticipatory interactive planning. In E. N. Goody (Ed.), Social intelligence and interaction: Expressions and implications of the social bias in human intelligence (pp. 111-138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (Eds.) (1992). Talk at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Drummond, K., & Hopper, R. (1993). Back-channels revisted: Acknowledgement tokens and speakership incipiency. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 157-177.
39. Dunn, J., Brown, J., Slomkowski, C., Tesla, C., & Youngblade, L. (1991). Young childre's understanding of other people's feelings and beliefs: Individual differences and their antecedents. Child Development, 62, 1352-1366.
40. Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (Eds.) (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
42. Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (1976). Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in Society, 5, 25-66.
43. Fodor, J. A. (1968). Psychological explanation: An introduction to the philosophy of psychology. New York: Random House.
44. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press.
45. Fox, B. A., Hayashi, M., & Jasperson, R. (1996). Resources and repair: a cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson, Interaction and grammar (pp. 185-237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Frisch, K. von (1966). The dancing bees: an account of the life and senses of the honey bee. London: Methuen.
47. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
48. Garfinkel, H., & Wieder, D. L. (1992). Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In G. Watson & R. M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology (pp. 175-206). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
49. Gibbs, R. W., Jnr. (1983). Do people always process the literal meaning of indirect requests? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 9, 524-533.
50. Gilovich, T. (1990). Differential construal and the false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 623-634.
51. Glasersfeld, E. von (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality (pp. 17-40). New York: Norton.
52. Glasersfeld, E. von (1988). The reluctance to change a way of thinking. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 9, 83-90.
53. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
54. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face to face behavior. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday and Company.
55. Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Harper and Row.
56. Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48, 1-17.
57. Goldberg, B. (1991). Mechanism and meaning. In J. Hyman (Ed.), Investigating psychology: Sciences of the mind after Wittgenstein (pp. 48-66). New York: Routledge.
58. Good, D. (1995). Where does foresight end and hindsight begin? In E. Goody (Ed.), Social intelligence and interaction: Expressions and implications of the social bias in human intelligence (pp. 139-149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 283-307.
60. Goody, E. N. (Ed.) (1995). Social intelligence and interaction: Expressions and implications of the social bias in human intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Greatbatch, D., & Dingwall, R. (1998). Talk and identity in divorce mediation. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 121-132). London: Sage Publications.
62. Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, 66, 377-388.
63. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
64. Gumperz, J. J., & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.) (1996). Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65. Hala, S., & Carpendale, J. I. (1997). All in the mind: Children's understanding of mental life. In S. Hala (Ed.), The development of social cognition (pp. 189-239). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
66. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
67. Have, P. ten (1999). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
68. Heritage, J. (1984a). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
69. Heritage, J. (1984b). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299-345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. Heritage, J. (1999). Conversation analysis at century's end: practices of talk-in-interaction, their distributions, and their outcomes. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 69-76.
71. Horvath, A. (1981). An exploratory concept of the therapeutic alliance and its measurement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia.
72. Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
73. Ide, S. (1982). Japanese sociolinguistics: politeness and women's language. Lingua, 57, 357-385.
74. Innis, H. A. (1951/1991). The bias of communication (Rev. ed.). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
75. Jenkins, J. M., & Astington, J. W. (1996). Cognitive factors and family structure associated with theory of mind development in young children. Developmental Psychology, 32, 70-78.
76. Jopling, D. (1993). Cognitive science, other minds, and the philosophy of dialogue. In U. Neisser (Ed.), The perceived self (pp. 290-309). New York: Cambridge University Press.
77. Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press.
78. Lee, D. A., & Peck, J. J. (1995). Troubled waters: Argument as sociability revisited. Language in Society, 24, 29-53.
79. Lerner, G. H. (1996). Finding "face" in the preference structures of talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 303-321.
80. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81. Levinson, S. C. (1988). Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman's concepts of participation. In P. Drew & A. Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order (pp. 161-227). Boston: Northeastern University Press.
82. Levinson, S. C. (1992). Activity types and language. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 66-100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
83. Levinson, S. C. (1995). Interactional biases in human thinking. In E. N. Goody (Ed.), Social intelligence and interaction: Expressions and implications of the social bias in human intelligence (pp. 221-260). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84. Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: the theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85. Lewis, C., Freeman, N. H., Kyriakidou, C., Maridaki-Kassotiaki, K., & Berridge, D. M. (1996). Social influences on false belief access: Specific sibling influences or general apprenticeship? Child Development, 67, 2930-2947.
86. Lewis, D. K. (1969). Convention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
87. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
88. MacMartin, C., Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2001). Facework. In W. P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 221-237). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
89. Malinowski, B. (1923). The problems of meaning in primitive languages. In C. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards (Eds.), The meaning of meaning (pp. 296-346). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
90. Malone, M. J. (1997). Worlds of talk. Cambridge: Polity Press.
91. Margolin, G., & Wampold, B. E. (1981). Sequential analysis of conflict and accord in distressed and nondistressed marital partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 554-567.
92. Meins, E. (1997). Security of attachment and the social development of cognition. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
93. Meins, E., & Fernyhough, C. (1999). Linguistic acquisitional style and mentalising development: The role of maternal mind-mindedness. Cognitive Development, 14, 363-380.
94. Montgomery, D. E. (1997). Wittgenstein's private language argument and children's understanding of mind. Developmental Review, 17, 291-320.
95. Muntigl, P. (2001). Couples counseling and semogenesis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University.
96. Muntigl, P., & Turnbull, W. (1998). Conversational structure and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics, 29, 225-256.
97. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
98. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
99. Ochs, E. (1988). Culture and language development: Language acquisition and language socialization in a Samoan village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
100. Ochs, E. (1992). Indexing gender. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 336-358). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
101. Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. A. (1996). Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
102. Ochs Keenan, E. (1975). The universality of conversational implicature. In R. Fasold and R. Shuy (Eds.), Studies in language variation (pp. 255-268). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
103. Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy. New York: Methuen.
104. Owen, M. (1983). Apologies and remedial interchanges. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.
105. Penman, R. (1990). Facework and politeness: Multiple goals in courtroom discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9, 15-38.
106. Perner, J., Ruffman, T., & Leekam, S. R. (1994). Theory of mind is contagious: You catch it from your sibs. Child Development, 65, 1228-1238.
107. Peters, R. S. (1958). The concept of motivation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
108. Piaget, J. (1932/1965). The moral judgment of the child. New York: The Free Press.
109. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57-101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
110. Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A new way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219-230.
111. Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.
112. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage.
113. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1995). Natural order: Why social psychologists should study (a constructed version of) natural language, and why they have not done so. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 216-222.
114. Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
115. Pulvermuller, F. (1999). Words in the brain's language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 253-336.
116. Rawls, A. (1989). Language, self, and social order: A reformulation of Goffman and Sacks. Human Studies, 12, 147-192.
117. Rawls, A. (1990). Emergent sociality: A dialectic of commitment and order. Symbolic Interaction, 13, 63-82.
118. Reddy, M. J. (1979). The conduit metaphor - a case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284-324). New York: Cambridge University Press.
119. Robinson, I. (1975). The new grammarian's funeral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
120. Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 21-27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
121. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vols. 1 and 2). Oxford: Blackwell.
122. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
123. Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 28-52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
124. Schegloff, E. A. (1993). Reflections on quantification in studies of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 99-128.
125. Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse and Society, 8, 165-187.
126. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361-382.
127. Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 7, 289-327.
128. Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
129. Schiffrin, D. (1984). Jewish argument as sociability. Language in Society, 13, 311-335.
130. Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
131. Schober, M. F., & Clark, H. H. (1989). Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 211-232.
132. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. B. (1983). Face in interethnic communication. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 156-189). New York: Longmans.
133. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
134. Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of information. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
135. Sharrock, W., & Anderson, B. (1986). The ethnomethodologists. London: Tavistock.
136. Slugoski, B. R., & Turnbull, W. (1988). Cruel to be kind and kind to be cruel: Sarcasm, banter, and social relations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7, 101-121.
137. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
138. Stroud, B. (1996), Mind, meaning, and practice. In H. Sluga & D. G. Stern (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein (pp. 296-319). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
139. Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
140. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated action: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
141. Sudnow, D. (1972). Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press.
142. Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
143. Terasaki, A. (1976). Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. Social Science Working Paper No. 99, Irvine, CA: School of Social Science, University of California.
144. Thomasello, M. (Ed.). (1998). The new psychology of language: Functional and cognitive approaches. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
145. Tracy, K. (1990). The many faces of facework. In H. Giles & W. P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 209-226). Chichester: Wiley.
146. Tulving, E. (1995). Organization of memory: Quo vadis? In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 839-847). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
147. Turnbull, W. (1986). Everyday explanation: The pragmatics of puzzle resolution. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 16, 141-160.
148. Turnbull, W. (1992). A conversation approach to explanation, with emphasis on politeness and accounting. In M. L. McLaughlin, M. J. Cody, & S. J. Read (Eds.), Explaining oneself to others: Reason-giving in a social context (pp. 105-130). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
149. Turnbull, W. (2001). An appraisal of pragmatic elicitation techniques for the social psychological study of talk: The case of request refusals. Pragmatics, 11, 31-61.
150. Turnbull, W., & Carpendale, J. I. M. (1999a). Locating meaning in interaction, not in the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 304-305.
151. Turnbull, W., & Carpendale, J. I. M. (1999b). A social pragmatic model of talk: Implications for research on the development of children's social understanding. Human Development, 42, 328-355.
152. Turnbull, W., & Carpendale, J. I. M. (2001a). Talk and the development of social understanding. Early Education & Development, 12, 455-477.
153. Turnbull, W., & Carpendale, J. I. M. (2001b). The morality of interaction. Paper presented at the conference of the Association for Moral Education, Vancouver, BC, October, 2001.
154. Turnbull, W., & Carpendale, J. (2002). Constraint and cooperation in parent-child interaction. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Canadian Psychological Association, Vancouver, BC, June 2002.
155. Turnbull, W., & Saxton, K. L. (1997). Modal expressions as facework in refusals to comply with requests: I think I should say 'no' right now. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 145-181.
156. Turnbull, W., & Slugoski, B. R. (1988). Conversational and linguistic processes in causal attribution. In D. Hilton (Ed.), Contemporary science and natural explanation: Commonsense conceptions of causality (pp. 66-93). New York: New York University Press.
157. Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1997). Production, evaluation, and preservation of experiences: Constructive processing in remembering and performance tasks. In D. Medin (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 37, pp. 211-264). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
158. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2000). The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 26, 547-565.
159. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2001). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: 1. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 27, 3-13.
160. Wierzbicka, A. (1986). Does language reflect culture? Some evidence from Australian English. Language in Society, 15, 349-374.
161. Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1981). On Grice's theory of conversation. In P. Werth (Ed.), Conversation and discourse (pp. 155-178). London: Croom Helm.
162. Wilson, T. D., & Brekke, (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 117-142.
163. Wilson, T. D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1978). The accuracy of verbal reports about the effects of stimuli on evaluations of behavior. Social Psychology, 41, 118-130.
164. Wimmer, H. & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103-128.
165. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
166. Wittgenstein, L. (1970). Zettel (G. E. Anscombe Trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
167. Wood, L. A. & Kroger, R. O. (1994). The analysis of facework in discourse: Review and proposal. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 248-277.
168. Wood, L. A. & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
169. Wooffitt, R., & Clark, C. (1998). Mobilizing discourse and social identities in knowledge talk. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 107-120). London: Sage Publications.
170. Wootton, A. J. (1997). Interaction and the development of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
171. Zimmerman, D. H. (1998). Identity, context and interaction. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 87-106). London: Sage Publications.