Visual dominance and visual egalitarianism: Individual and group-Level influences of sex and status in group interactions

Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 137-153

  Koch, Sabine C ^a   Baehne, Christina G ^b   Kruse, Lenelis ^a   Zimmermann, Friederike ^a   Zumbach, Joerg ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

Author keywords

Dominance; Egalitarianism; Gaze; Gender; Group interaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954448725     PISSN: 01915886     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10919-010-0088-8     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256-274.
2. Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Chicago: Rand McNally.
3. Bales, R. F., & Cohen, S. P. (1982). SYMLOG-Ein System für die mehrstufige Beobachtung von Gruppen. [SYMLOG-A system of the multi-layer observation of groups]. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
4. Berger, J., Conner, T. L., & Fisek, M. H. (1974). Expectation states theory: A theoretical research program. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
5. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
6. Conway, M., Pizzamiglio, M. T., & Mount, L. (1996). Status, communality, and agency: Implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 25-38.
7. Copeland, C. L., Driskell, J. E., & Salas, E. (1995). Gender and reactions to dominance. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 53-68.
8. Deaux, K., & LaFrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 788-827). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
9. Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369-389.
10. DePaulo, B. M., & Friedman, H. S. (1998). Nonverbal communication. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 3-40). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
11. Dovidio, J. F., & Ellyson, S. L. (1982). Decoding visual dominance behavior: Attributions of power based on the relative percentages of looking while speaking and looking while listening. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 106-113.
12. Dovidio, J. F., & Ellyson, S. L. (1985). Pattern of visual dominance behaviors in humans. In S. L. Ellyson & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), Power, dominance and nonverbal behavior (pp. 129-149). New York: Springer.
13. Dovidio, J. F., Brown, C. E., Heltman, K., Ellyson, S. L., & Keating, C. F. (1988a). Power displays between women and men in discussions of gender-linked tasks: A multichannel study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 580-587.
14. Dovidio, J. F., Ellyson, S. L., Keating, C. F., Heltman, K., & Brown, C. E. (1988b). The relationship of social power to visual displays of dominance between men and women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 233-242.
15. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice towards female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.
17. Ebel, R. L. (1951). Estimation of the reliability of ratings. Psychometrika, 16, 407-424.
18. Ellyson, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., & Fehr, B. J. (1981). Visual behavior and dominance in women and men. In C. Mayo & N. M. Henley (Eds.), Gender and nonverbal behavior (pp. 63-79). New York: Springer.
19. Exline, R. V., & Fehr, B. J. (1982). The assessment of gaze and mutual gaze. In P. Ekman & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), Handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 91-135). Cambridge: University Press.
20. Exline, R. V., Ellyson, S. L., & Long, B. (1975). Visual behavior as an aspect of power role relationships. In P. Pliner, L. Krames, & T. Alloway (Eds.), Nonverbal communication of aggression (pp. 53-759). New York: Plenum Press.
21. Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
22. Fiske, S. T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 231-254). New York: Guilford Press.
23. Giannopoulos, C., Conway, M., & Mendelson, M. (2005). The gender of status: The laypersons' perception of status groups is gender-typed. Sex Roles, 53, 795-806.
24. Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. London: Hopkins.
25. Hall, J. A., Coats, E. J., & Smith LeBeau, L. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 898-924.
26. Kalma, A. (1992). Gazing in triads: A powerful signal in floor apportionment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 21-39.
27. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
28. Kestenberg Amighi, J. K., Loman, S., Lewis, P., & Sossin, M. (1999). The meaning of movement: Developmental and clinical perspectives of the Kestenberg Movement Profile. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.
29. Kestenberg, J. S., & Sossin, K. M. (1979). The role of movement patterns in development (Vol. 2). New York: Dance Notation Bureau Press.
30. Knapp, M. L., & Hall, J. A. (1992). Nonverbal communication in human interaction (3rd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace.
31. Koch, S. C. (2004). Constructing gender: A lens-model inspired gender-communication approach. Sex Roles, 51, 171-186.
32. Koch, S. C., & Zumbach, J. (2002). The use of video analysis software in behavior observation research: Interaction patterns in task-oriented small groups. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], 3(2). Available at: http://www. qualitative-research. net/fqs/fqs-eng. html.
33. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
34. Lobel, S. A. (1999). Impacts of diversity and work-life initiatives in organizations. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 453-475). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Magnusson, M. S. (1997). Theme Software (Online Information). Retrieved Aug 11, 2003 from http://www. hi. is./~msm/behavior. html.
36. Magnusson, M. S. (2000). Discovering hidden time patterns in behavior: T-patterns and their detection. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 32, 93-110.
37. Mehrabian, A. (1970). A semantic space for nonverbal behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35, 248-257.
38. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2007). Mplus User's guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
39. Powell, G. N. (Ed.). (1999). Handbook of gender and work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Ridgeway, C. L., & Bourg, C. (2004). Gender as status: An expectation states theory approach. In A. H. Eagly, A. E. Beall, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (2nd ed., pp. 217-241). New York: Guilford Press.
41. Ridgeway, C. L., & Diekema, D. (1992). Are gender differences status differences? In C. L. Ridgeway (Ed.), Gender, interaction, and inequality (pp. 157-180). New York: Springer.
42. Ridgeway, C. L., Berger, J., & Smith, L. (1985). Nonverbal cues and status: An expectation states approach. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 955-978.
43. Schmid Mast, M. (2002). Female dominance hierarchies: Are they any different from males'? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 29-39.
44. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
45. Thimm, C. (1990). Dominanz und Sprache. Zur Beschreibung strategischen Handelns im Alltag. [Dominance and language. Strategic behavior in everyday life.]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Deutscher Universitaetsverlag.
46. Thimm, C., Rademacher, U., & Kruse, L. (1994). Power-related talk. Control in verbal interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 328-407.
47. Yoder, J. D. (1991). Rethinking tokenism: Looking beyond numbers. Gender and Society, 5, 178-192.