Female dominance hierarchies: Are they any different from males'?

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 29-39

  Mast, Marianne Schmid ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044530189     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167202281003     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Appleby, M. C. (1983). The probability of linearity in hierarchies. Animal Behavior, 31, 600-608.
2. Aries, E.J. (1976). Interaction patterns and themes of male, female and mixed groups. Small Group Behavior, 7, 7-18.
3. Aries, E.J., Gold, C., & Weigel, R. H. (1983). Dispositional and situational influences on dominance behavior in small groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 779-786.
4. Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5. Bales, R. F., Strodtbeck, F. L., Mills, T. M., & Roseborough, M. E. (1951). Channels of communication in small groups. American Sociological Review, 76, 461-468.
6. Balkwell, J. W. (1995). Strong tests of expectation-states hypothesis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 44-51.
7. Barner-Barry, C. (1980). The structure of young children's authority relationships. In D. R. Omark, F. F. Strayer, & D. G. Freedman (Eds.), Dominance relations: An ethological view of human conflict and social interaction (pp. 177-189). New York: Garland.
8. Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch, M. (1072). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37, 241-255.
9. Berger, J., Ridgeway, C. L., Fisek, M. H., & Norman, R. Z. (1998). The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. American Sociological Review, 63, 379-405.
10. Bischof-Kohler, D. (1990). Frau und Karriere in psychobiologischer Sicht [Woman and career in a psychobiological view]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie [Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology], 34, 17-28.
11. Bischof-Kohler, D. (1992). Geschlechtstypische Besonderheiten im Konkurrenzverhalten: Evolutionäre Grundlagen und entwicklungspsychologische Fakten [Gender-typical peculiarities in competitive behavior: Evolutionary basis and developmental-psychological facts]. In G. Krell & M. Osterloh (Eds.), Personalpolitik aus der Sicht von Frauen. Was kann die Personalforschungvon der Frauenforschung lernen? [Human resource policy in the view of women. What can human resource studies learn from women's studies?] (pp. 251-281). Munich, Germany: Rainer Hampp Verlag.
12. Bjorkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K.M.J., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 117-127.
13. Carlson Jones, D. (1984). Dominance and affiliation as factors in the social organization of same-sex groups of elementary school children. Ethology and Sociobiology, 5, 193-202.
14. Cashdan, E. (1998). Are men more competitive than women? British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 213-229.
15. Charlesworth, W. R., & Dzur, C. (1987). Gender comparisons of preschoolers' behavior and resource utilization in group problem solving. Child Development, 58, 191-200.
16. Chase, I. D. (1980). Social process and hierarchy formation in small groups: A comparative perspective. American Sociological Review, 45, 905-924.
17. De Vries, H. (1998). Finding a dominance order most consistent with a linear hierarchy: A new procedure and review. Animal Behaviour, 55, 827-843.
18. De Vries, H., Netto, W.J., & Hanegraaf, P.L.H. (1993). Matman: A program for the analysis of sociometric matrices and behavioural transition matrices. Behaviour, 125, 157-175.
19. Dindia, K. (1987). The effects of sex of subject and sex of partner on interruptions. Human Communication Research, 13, 345-371.
20. Dobbins, G. H. (1986). Equity vs. equality: Sex differences in leadership. Sex Roles, 15, 513-525.
21. Driskell, J. E., & Mullen, B. (1990). Status, expectations, and behavior: A meta-analytic review and test of the theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 541-553.
22. Fallon, J., & Guo, D. (1994). The relationship between topic familiarity and conversational dominance. Journal of Human Behavior, 31, 53-57.
23. Ferguson, N. (1977). Simultaneous speech, interruptions and dominance. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 295-302.
24. Goldberg, J. (1990). Interrupting the discourse on interruptions: An analysis in terms of relationally neutral, power- and rapport-oriented acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 883-903.
25. Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
26. Kennedy, C. W., & Camden, C. T. (1983). A new look at interruptions. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 45-58.
27. Linkey, H. E., & Firestone, I.J. (1990). Dyad dominance composition effects, nonverbal behaviors, and influence. Journal of Research in Personality, 24, 206-215.
28. Mosteller, F. M., & Bush, R. R. (1954). Selected quantitative techniques. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology: Vol. 1. Theory and method (pp. 289-334). Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
29. Ng, S. H., Brooke, M., & Dunne, M. (1995). Interruption an influence in discussion groups. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 369-381.
30. Pettit, G. S., Bakshi, A., Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1990). The emergence of social dominance in young boys' play groups: Developmental differences and behavioral correlates. Developmental Psychology, 26, 1017-1025.
31. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable relevant to social roles and intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
32. Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., & Sidanius, J. (1997). The gender gap: Differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 49-68.
33. Ridgeway, C. L., & Berger, J. (1986). Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups. American Sociological Review, 51, 603-617.
34. Ridgeway, C. L., & Diekema, D. (1989). Dominance and collective hierarchy formation in male and female task groups. American Sociological Review, 54, 79-93.
35. Ridge way, C. L., Diekema, D., & Johnson, C. (1995). Legitimacy, compliance, and gender in peer groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 298-311.
36. Robinson, L. F., & Reis, H. T. (1989). The effects of interruption, gender, and status on interpersonal perceptions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 141-153.
37. Roger, D., Bull, P., & Smith, S. (1988). The development of a comprehensive system for classifying interruptions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7, 27-36.
38. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982). Comparing effect sizes of independent studies. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 500-504.
41. Savin-Williams, R. C. (1979). Dominance hierarchies in groups of early adolescents. Child Development 50, 923-935.
42. Schjelderup-Ebbe, T. (1922). Soziale Verhältnisse bei Vögeln [Social relationships among birds], Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 90, 106-107.
43. Skvoretz, J., & Fararo, T. J. (1996). Status and participation in task groups: A dynamic network model. Journal of Sociology, 101, 1366-1414.
44. Strayer, F. R., & Strayer, J. (1976). An ethological analysis of social agonism and dominance relations among preschool children. Child Development, 47, 980-989.
45. Strongman, K. T., & Champness, B. G. (1968). Dominance hierarchies and conflict in eye contact. Acta Psychologica, 28, 376-386.
46. Tannen, D. (1993). The relativity of linguistic strategies: Rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 165-188). Oxford, UK: University Press.
47. Vrugt, A., & Kerkstra, A. (1984). Sex differences in nonverbal communication. Semiotica, 50, 1-41.
48. Weisfeld, G. E., & Weisfeld, C. C. (1984). An observational study of social evaluation: An application of the dominance hierarchy model. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 145, 89-99.
49. Zimmerman, D. H., & West, C. (1975). Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 105-129). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.