Constructing gender: A lens-model inspired gender communication approach

Sex Roles

Volumn 51, Issue 3-4, 2004, Pages 171-186

  Koch, Sabine C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

cue analysis; gender construction; language; nonverbal communication; stereotypes

Indexed keywords

EID: 4444220151     PISSN: 03600025     EISSN: 15732762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:SERS.0000037761.09044.ae     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Aries, E. (1987). Gender and communication. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 149-176.
2. Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290.
3. Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Chicago: Rand McNally.
4. Barsalou, L. W., Niedenthal, P. M., Barbey, A. K., & Ruppert, J. A. (2003). Social embodiment. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 43, pp. 43-92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
5. Berger, J., Connor, T. L., & Fisek, M. H. (1974). Expectation states theory. A theoretical research program. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
6. Berger J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Zeldich, M. Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation-states approach. New York: Elsevier.
7. Berger, J., Webster, M., Jr., Ridgeway, C. L., & Rosenholtz, S. J. (1986). Status cues, expectations, and behaviors. In E. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 3, pp. 1-22). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
8. Berry, D. S., Misovich, S. J., Kean, K. J., & Baron, R. M. (1992). Effects of disruption of structure on perceptions of social causality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 237-244.
9. Biemans, M. (1999). Production and perception of gendered voice quality. In U. Pasero & F. Braun (Eds.), Wahrnehmung und Herstellung von Geschlecht-Perceiving and performing gender (pp. 63-72). Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
10. Biernat, M. (1995). The shifting standards model: Implications of stereotype accuracy for social judgment. In Y. Lee, L. Jussim, & C. R. McCauley (Eds.), Stereotype accuracy: Toward appreciating group differences (pp. 87-114). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11. Biernat, M., & Fuegen, K. (2001). Shifting standards and the evaluation of competence. Complexity in gender-based judgement and decision making. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 707-724.
12. Biernat, M., & Kobrynowicz, D. (1997). Gender- and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 544-557.
13. Birdwhistell, R. L. (1972). Kinesics and context. Essays on body motion communication. New York: Ballantine.
14. Blythe, P. W., Todd, P. M., & Miller, G. F. (1999). How motion reveals intention. Categorizing social interactions. In G. Gigerenzer, P. Todd, and the ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 257-285). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15. Braun, F., Eckes, T., Gottburgsen, A., & Oelkers, S. (2000). Stereotypgestützte Sprachrezeption [Stereotypic perception of language]. Abschlussbericht DFG-Projekt Br 1627/4-1. University of Kiel: Unpublished Research Report.
16. Brunswik, E. (1940). Thing constancy as measured by correlation coefficients. Psychological Review, 47, 69-78.
17. Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
18. Burgoon, J. K. (1994). Nonverbal signals. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 229-285). London: Sage.
19. Butler, D., & Geis, F. (1990). Nonverbal affect responses to male and female leaders: Implications for leadership evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 48-59.
20. Cacioppo, J. T., Priester, J. R., & Berntson, G. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 5-17.
21. Carli, L. L. (1990). Gender, language, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 941-951.
22. Carli, L. L., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender effects on influence and emergent leadership. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 203-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Carli, L. L., LaFleur, S. J., & Loeber, C. C. (1995). Nonverbal behavior, gender, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1030-1041.
24. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Education and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
25. Davison, H. K., & Burke, M. J. (2000). Sex discrimination in simulated employment contexts: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 225-248.
26. Deaux, K. (1998). An overview of research on gender: Four themes from three decades. In W. B. Swann Jr., J. H. Langloise, & L. A. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp. 11-33). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
27. Deaux, K., & LaFrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 788-827). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
28. Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 3, 369-389.
29. Dovidio, J. F., Brown, C. E., Heltmann, K., Ellyson, S. L., & Keating, C. F. (1988). Power displays between women and men in discussions of gender-linked tasks: A multichannel study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 580-587.
30. Dovidio, J. F., Ellyson, S. L., Keating, C. F., Heltman, K., & Brown C. E. (1988). The relationship of social power to visual displays of dominance between men and women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 233-242.
31. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.
33. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
34. Foddy, M., & Smithson, M. (1999). Can gender inequalities be eliminated? Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 307-324.
35. Foschi, M. (1992). Gender and double standards for competence. In C. Ridgeway (Ed.) Gender, interaction and inequality (pp. 181-207). New York: Springer.
36. Foschi, M. (2000). Double standards for competence. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 21-42.
37. Geis, F. L. (1993). Self-fulfilling prophecies: A social psychological view of gender. In A. E. Beall & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 9-54). New York: Guilford.
38. Goldberg, P. (1968). Are women prejudiced against women? Transaction, 5, 316-322.
39. Grammer, K., Fidova, V., & Fieder, M. (1997). The communication paradox and a possible solution: Toward a radical empiricism. In A. Schmitt, K. Atzwanger, K. Grammer & K. Schäfer (Eds.), New aspects of human ethology (pp. 91-120). New York: Plenum.
40. Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845-857.
41. Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. London: Hopkins.
42. Hannah, A., & Murachver, T. (1999). Gender and conversational style as predictors of conversational behavior. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 153-174.
43. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
44. Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243-259.
45. Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657-674.
46. Keki, V. (2000). Der menschliche Gang als Signal: Einsatz eines künstlichen neuronalen Netzwerks in der Bewegungsanalyse [Human gait as a signal: Using an artficial neural network in movement analysis]. Wien: Diplomarbeit. Retreived June 20, 2001, from http://www.urbanethology.at/
47. Kendon, A. (1982). The organization of behavior in face-to-face interaction: Observations on the development of a methodology. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 440-505). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48. Kestenberg, J. S. (1975). Parents and children. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
49. Kestenberg-Amighi, J., Loman, S., Sossin, K. M., & Lewis, P. (1999). The meaning of movement: Developmental and clinical perspectives of the Kestenberg Movement Profile. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.
50. Koch, S. C. (2000). WorkComm-G. Entwicklung eines Fragebogens zur geschlechtsspezifischen Arbeitsplatzkommunikation [Development of a questionnaire for gender-related workplace communication]. Heidelberg: Unpublished manuscript. Questionnaire available at http://workcomm.uni-hd.de (German only).
51. Koch, S. C. (2002). Evaluative affect display toward male and female leaders and its mediation in small groups. Unpublished manuscript.
52. Koch, S. C., Kruse, L., Schey, S., & Thimm, C. (1999). Kommunikationseinstellungen und -erwartungen von Münnern und Frauen am Arbeitsplatz [Communication attitudes and experiences of women and men at the workplace]. WorkComm Arbeitsbericht Nr. 1. Universität Heidelberg. [Online document] Available at http://workcomm.uni-hd.de
53. Koch, S. C., Müller, B., Kruse, L., & Zumbach, J. (2004). "Doing gender" in chat communication. Manuscript submitted for publication.
54. Kruse, L. (1978). Ökologische Perspektiven in der Allgemeinen Psychologie [Ecological perspectives in general psychology]. In C.F. Graumann (Ed.), Ökologische Perspektiven in der Psychologie [Ecological perspectives in psychology] (pp. 98-104). Bern: Huber.
55. Krämer, N. C. (2001). Bewegende Bewegung: Sozio-emotionale Wirkungen nonverbalen Verhaltens und deren experimentelle Untersuchung mittels Computeranimation [Moving movement: socioemotional influences of nonverbal behaviour and their experimental investigation by means of computer animation]. Lengerich, Germany: Pabst.
56. LaFrance, M., & Henley, N. M. (1994). On oppression hypotheses: Or differences in nonverbal sensitivity revisited. In H. L. Radtke & H. J. Stam (Eds.), Power/gender: Social relations in theory and practice (pp. 287-311). London: Sage.
57. Lorber, J., & Farrell, S. (1991). The social construction of gender. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
58. Merten, K. (1995). Inhaltsanalyse [Content analysis]. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
59. Mulac, A. (1998). The gender-linked language effect: Do language differences really make a difference? In D. J. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (pp. 127-153). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. Neumann, R., & Strack, F. (2000). Approach and avoidance: The influence of proprioceptive and exteroceptive cues on encoding of affective information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 39-48.
61. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
62. Pasero, U., & Braun, F. (1999). Wahrnehmung und Herstellung von Geschlecht - Perceiving and performing gender. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
63. Pauen, S., & Träuble, B. (2002, April). Causal attribution of animate motion in 7-months-olds. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Conference on Infant Studies, Toronto, ON, Canada.
64. Ridgeway, C. L (1992). Introduction: Gender and the role of interaction in inequality. In C. L. Ridgeway (Ed.), Gender, interaction, and inequality (pp. IX-XVI). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
65. Ridgeway, C. L. (1997). Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality. Considering employment. American Sociological Review, 62, 218-235.
66. Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 637-656.
67. Rosenthal, R., & DePaulo, B. (1979). Sex differences in eaves-dropping on nonverbal cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 273-285.
68. Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 743-762.
69. Strand, E. A. (1999). Gender perception influences speech processing. In U. Pasero & F. Braun (Eds.), Wahrnehmung und Herstellung von Geschlecht - Perceiving and performing gender (pp. 127-136). Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
70. Thimm, C., Koch, S. C., & Schey, S. (2002). Communicating gendered professional identity: Competence, cooperation, and conflict in the workplace. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), Handbook of gender and language (pp. 528-549). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
71. Todd, P. M., Barett, C. H., Blythe, P. W., & Miller, G. F. (2002). Accurate judgments of intention from motion cues alone. Manuscript submitted for publication.
72. von Laban, R., & Laurence, F. C. (1974). Effort: Economy in body movement. Boston: Plays. Original work published 1947.
73. Wallbott, H. G. (1990). Mimik im Kontext: Die Bedeutung verschiedener Informations-komponenten für das Erkennen von Emotionen. [Mimic in context: The significance of different Information sources for recognizing emotions.] Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
74. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125-151.