Conversion degree of indirect resin composites and effect of thermocycling on their physical properties

Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 218-225

  Souza, Rodrigo O A ^a   Özcan, Mutlu ^b   Michida, Silvia M A ^a   de Melo, Renata M ^a   Pavanelli, Carlos A ^a   Bottino, Marco A ^a   Soares, Luís E S ^c   Martin, Airton A ^c  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c INSTITUTO DE PESQUISA E DESENVOLVIMENTO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Degree of conversion; Flexural strength; Indirect resin composites; Vicker's hardness

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYMER; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYURETHAN; RESIN; SILICON DIOXIDE; SINFONY COMPOSITE RESIN; TRIETHYLENE GLYCOL DIMETHACRYLATE; URETHANE DIMETHACRYLATE LUTING RESIN; VITA ZETA LC; DENTAL MATERIAL;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; HARDNESS; HUMAN; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PLIABILITY; RAMAN SPECTROMETRY; TEMPERATURE; TIME; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DEVICES;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HARDNESS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PHENOMENA; PLIABILITY; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYMERS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; POLYURETHANES; SILICON DIOXIDE; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS, RAMAN; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 77954353640     PISSN: 1059941X     EISSN: 1532849X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00551.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001, 3:45-64.
2. Kildal KK, Ruyter IE. How different curing methods affect mechanical properties of composites for inlays when tested in dry and wet conditions. Eur J Oral Sci 1997, 105:353-361.
3. Özcan M, Alander P, Vallittu PK. Effect of three surface conditioning methods to improve bond strength of particulate filler resin composites. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 2005, 16:21-27.
4. Laboratory composites. 1999, The Dental Advisor
5. Microhybrid and microfilled composites. 2000, The Dental Advisor
6. Touati B, Aidan N. Second generation laboratory composite resins for indirect restorations. J Esthet Dent 1997, 9:108-118.
7. Nash RW. Processed composite resin-a versatile restorative material. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2002, 23:142-158.
8. 18-Year report on laboratory composites. 2003, The Dental Advisor
9. Wendt SL. The effect of heat used as the secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins. I. Diametral tensile strength, compressive strength and marginal dimensional stability. Quintessence Int 1987, 18:265-271.
10. Yamaga T, Sato Y, Akagawa Y. Hardness and fracture toughness of four commercial visible light-cured composite resin veneering materials. J Oral Rehabil 1995, 22:857-863.
11. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Mechanical properties of three composite resins for the inlay/onlay technique. J Prosthet Dent 1991, 66:322-324.
12. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. The effect of postcuring on quantity of remaining double bonds, mechanical properties, and in vitro wear of two resin composites. J Dent 2000, 28:447-452.
13. Erdrich AJ. ArtGlass: a unique polyglass technology for prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Laboratory Digest 1996, 2-3.
14. Freiberg RS, Ferracane JL. Evaluation of cure, properties and wear resistance of ArtGlass dental composite. Am J Dent 1998, 11:214-218.
15. Mandikos MN, McGivney GP, Davis E. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2001, 85:386-395.
16. Rossomando KJ, Wendt SL. Thermocycling and dwell times in microleakage evaluation for bonded restorations. Dent Mater 1995, 11:47-51.
17. Palin WN, Fleming GJP, Burke FJT. The reliability in flexural strength testing of a novel dental composite. J Dent 2003, 31:549-557.
18. Kawano F, Ohguri T, Ichikawa T. Influence of thermal cycles in water on flexural strength of laboratory-processed composite resin. J Oral Rehabil 2001, 28:703-707.
19. Friedman J, Hassan R. Comparison study of visible curing lights and hardness of light-cured restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1984, 52:504-506.
20. Zhao D, Botsis J, Drummond JL. Fracture studies of selected dental restorative composites. Dent Mater 1997, 13:198-297.
21. Anusavice KJ. Phillip's Science of Dental Materials 1996, 46. ed 10, Philadelphia, Saunders, p
22. Lu H, Mehmood A, Chow A. Influence of polymerization mode on flexural properties of esthetic resin luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 2005, 94:549-554.
23. Specification of dentistry-resin-based filling materials. 1988, International Organization for Standardization, ISO-4049
24. Kakaboura A, Rahiotis C, Zinelis S. In vitro characterization of two laboratory-processed resin composites. Dent Mater 2003, 19:393-398.
25. Knobloch LA, Kerby RE, Seghi R. Two-body wear resistance and degree of conversion of laboratory-processed composite materials. Int J Prosthodont 1999, 12:432-438.
26. Neves AD, Discacciati JA, Orefice RL. Influence of the power density on the kinetics of photopolymerization and properties of dental composites. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomat 2005, 72:393-400.
27. St-Georges A, Swift E, Thompson JY. Irradiance effects on the mechanical properties of universal hybrid and flowable hybrid resin composites. Dent Mater 2003, 19:406-413.
28. Gauthier MA, Stangel I, Ellis TH. Oxygen inhibition in dental resins. J Dent Res 2005, 84:725-729.
29. Ferracane JL, Berge HX, Condon JR. In vitro aging of dental composites in water-effect of degree of conversion, filler volume, and filler/matrix coupling. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomat 1998, 42:465-472.
30. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Influence of UEDMA, BisGMA and TEGDMA on selected mechanical properties of experimental resin composites. Dent Mater 1998, 14:51-56.
31. Gohring TN, Gallo L, Luthy H. Effect of water storage, thermocycling, the incorporation and site of placement of glass-fibers on the flexural strength of veneering composite. Dent Mater 2005, 21:761-772.
32. Spencer P, Wang Y, Bohaty B. Interfacial chemistry of moisture-aged class II composite restorations. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomat 2006, 77:234-240.
33. Leung RL, Kahn RL, Fan PL. Comparison of depth of polymerization evaluation methods for photo-activated composite. J Dent Res 1984, 63:292-296.
34. Drummond JL. Degradation, fatigue, and failure of resin dental composite materials. J Dent Res 2008, 87:710-719.
35. Rueggeberg FA, Craig RG. Correlation of parameters used to estimate monomer conversion in a light-cured composite. J Dent Res 1988, 67:932-937.
36. Beun S, Glorieux T, Devaux J. Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites. Dent Mater 2007, 23:51-59.
37. Ferracane JL, Greener EH. The effect of resin formulation on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorative resins. J Biomed Mater Res 1986, 20:121-131.
38. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Influence of pulse-delay curing on softening of polymer structures. J Dent Res 2001, 80:1570-1573.
39. Souza ROA, Özcan M, Michida MA. Conversion degree and thermocycling effect on physical properties of indirect resins. J Dent Res 2006, (Special Issue A:236). (Abstract# 0092)