Patent Incentives, Technology Markets, and Public-Private Bio-Medical Innovation Networks in Brazil

World Development

Volumn 38, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1082-1093

  Ryan, Michael P ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bio medical technology; Brazil; Intellectual property rights; Patents; Technology innovation; Technology networks

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPING WORLD; ENTREPRENEUR; INNOVATION; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS; INVESTMENT; PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

BRAZIL; SAO PAULO [BRAZIL];

EID: 77954313324     PISSN: 0305750X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Agarwal A., Henderson A. Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science 2002, 48:44-61.
2. Arora A. Licensing tacit knowledge: Intellectual property rights and the market for know-how. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 1995, 4:41-59.
3. Arora A. Contracting for tacit knowledge: The provision of technical services in technology license contracts. Journal of Development Economics 1996, 50:233-256.
4. Arora A. Patents, licensing, and market structure in the chemical industry. Research Policy 1997, 26:391-403.
5. Arora A., Ceccagnoli M., Cohen W.M. Trading knowledge: An exploration of patent protection and other determinants of market transactions in technology and R&D. Financing innovation in the United States, 1870 to the present 2007, 365-404. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. N.R. Lamoreaux, K.L. Sokoloff (Eds.).
6. Arora A., Fosfuri A.A., Gambardella A. Specialized technology suppliers, international spillovers and investment. Journal of Development Economics 2001, 65:31-54.
7. Baumol W.J., Litan R.E., Schramm C.J. Good capitalism, bad capitalism, and the economics of growth and prosperity 2007, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
8. Bessen J., Meurer M.J. Patent litigation with endogenous disputes. American Economic Review 2006, 96:77-81.
9. Bessen J., Meurer M.J. Patent failure: How judges, bureaucrats, and lawyers put innovators at risk 2008, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
10. Branscomb L.M., Kodama F., Florida R. Industrializing knowledge: University-industry linkages in Japan and the United States 1999, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
11. Branstetter, L. G. (2005). Do stronger patents induce more local innovation? In K. Maskus, & J. H. Reichman (Eds.). International public goods and transfer of technology under a globalized intellectual property regime (pp. 309-320).
12. Brito Cruz, C. H. & de Mello, L. (2006). Boosting innovation performance in Brazil. Economics Department Working Paper No. 532. Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.
13. Cardoso F.H. The accidental president of Brazil: A memoir 2006, Publicaffairs, New York.
14. Chen Y., Puttitanun T. Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics 2005, 78:474-493.
15. Cohen W.M., Walsh J.P. Real impediments to academic biomedical research. Innovation policy and the economy 2007, 1-31. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. A.P. Jaffe, J. Lerner, S. Stern (Eds.).
16. Correa C.M. TRIPS and TRIPS-plus protection and impacts in Latin America. Intellectual property, trade, and development: Strategies to optimize economic development in a TRIPS-plus era 2007, 221-258. Oxford University Press, New York. D. Gervais (Ed.).
17. Dahlman C.J., Frischtak C.R. National systems supporting technical advance in industry: The Brazilian experience. National innovation systems 1993, 414-450. Oxford University Press, New York. R.R. Nelson (Ed.).
18. Dam K. The economic underpinnings of patent law. Journal of Legal Studies 1994, 23:247-271.
19. Danzon P., Wang Y.R., Wang L. The impact of price regulation on the launch and delay of new drugs. Journal of Health Economics 2005, 14:269-292.
20. Eisenberg R.S. Proprietary rights and the norms of science in biotechnology research. Yale Law Journal 1987, 97:179-231.
21. Eisenberg R.S. Patents and the progress of science: Exclusive rights and experimental use. University of Chicago Law Review 1989, 56:1017-1086.
22. Eisenberg R.S. Public research private development: Patents and technology transfer in government-sponsored research. Virginia Law Review 1996, 83:1663-1727.
23. Epstein R.A., Kuhlik B.N. Is there a biomedical anticommons?. Regulation 2004, 27:54-58.
24. Evans P.B. The new commons versus the second enclosure movement. Studies in Comparative International Development 2005, 40:85-94.
25. Fagerberg J. Innovation: A guide to the literature. The Oxford handbook of innovation 2005, 1-27. Oxford University Press, New York. J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, R.R. Nelson (Eds.).
26. Feldman M., Feller I., Bercovitz J., Burton R. Equity and the technology transfer strategies of American Research Universities. Management Science 2002, 48:105-121.
27. Fundacao de Amparao a Pequisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) Translating research into business: Ten years promoting technological innovation 2005, FAPESP, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
28. Forero-Pineda C. The impact of stronger intellectual property rights on science and technology in developing countries. Research Policy 2006, 35:808-824.
29. Fink, C., & Maskus, K. E. (Eds.). (2005). Intellectual property and development: Lessons from recent economic research. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. George A., Bennett A. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences 2005, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
31. Gervais, D. (Ed.). (2007). Intellectual property, trade and development: Strategies to optimize economic development in a TRIPS plus era. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Grabowski H.G., Vernon J. A new look at the returns and risks to pharmaceutical R&D. Management Science 1990, 36:167-185.
33. Grabowski H.G., Vernon J. Returns on research and development for 1990s new drug introductions. PharmacoEconomics 2002, 20:11-29.
34. Grindley P., Teece D.J. Managing intellectual capital: Licensing and cross-licensing in semiconductors and electronics. California Management Review 1997, 39(2):8-41.
35. Grossman G.M., Helpman E. Innovation and growth in the global economy 1991, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
36. Heller M.A., Eisenberg R.S. Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science 1998, 280:698-701.
37. Hershberg E., Nabeshima K., Yusuf S. Opening the ivory tower to business: University-industry linkages and the development of knowledge-intensive clusters in Asian cities. World Development 2007, 35:931-940.
38. Jaffe A.B., Lerner J. Innovation and its discontents: How our broken patent system in endangering innovation and progress and what to do about it 2004, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
39. King G., Keohane R.O., Verba S. Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research 1994, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
40. Kingstone P.R. Why free trade " Losers" support free trade: Industrialists and the surprising politics of trade reform in Brazil. Comparative Political Studies 2001, 34:986-1010.
41. Kitch E. The nature and function of the patent system. Journal of Law and Economics 1977, 20:265-290.
42. Kyle M.K. Pharmaceutical price controls and entry strategies. Review of Economics and Statistics 2007, 89:88-99.
43. Lamoreaux N.R., Sokoloff K.L. Inventors, firms, and markets in the late nineteenth century/early twentieth centuries. Learning by doing in markets, firms, and countries 1999, 19-60. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. N.R. Lamoreaux, D.M.G. Raff, P. Temin (Eds.).
44. Lanjouw J.O., Schankerman M. Characteristics of patent litigation: A window on competition. The RAND Journal of Economics 2001, 32:129-151.
45. Lanjouw J.O., Schankerman M. Protecting intellectual property rights: Are small firms handicapped?. Journal of Law and Economics 2004, 47:45-74.
46. Lerner J. Patenting in the shadow of competitors. Journal of Law & Economics 1995, 38:463-495.
47. Lichtenberg F. Pharmaceutical innovation as a process of creative destruction. Knowledge accumulation and industry evolution 2006, 21-72. Cambridge University Press, New York. M. Mazzucato, G. Dosi (Eds.).
48. Mansfield E. Patents and innovation: An empirical study. Management Science 1986, 32:173-181.
49. Maskus K.E. Strengthening intellectual property rights in Lebanon. Intellectual property and development: Lessons from recent economic research 2005, 259-294. Oxford University Press, New York. C. Fink, K.E. Maskus (Eds.).
50. Maskus K., Reichman J.H. International public goods and transfer of technology under a globalized intellectual property regime 2005, Cambridge University Press, New York.
51. Merges R.P. A transactional view of property rights. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 2005, 20:1477-1520.
52. Mohr L.B. The reliability of the case study as a source of information. Advances in information processing in organizations 1985, 65-93. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT. R. Coulam, R. Smith (Eds.).
53. Montobbio F. Sectoral dynamics and structural change: Stylized facts and " System of Innovation" approaches. Sectoral systems of innovation: Concepts, issues, and analyses of six major sectors in Europe 2004, 42-72. Cambridge University Press, New York. F. Malerba (Ed.).
54. Moreira M.M. The point of view of an emerging trading nation: Brazil. Aggressive unilateralism: America's 301 trade policy and the world trading system 1990, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI. J. Bhagwati, H.T. Patrick (Eds.).
55. Mowery D.C. University-industry collaboration and technology transfer in the United States Since 1980. How universities promote economic growth 2007, 163-182. The World Bank, Washington, DC. S. Yusuf, K. Nabeshima (Eds.).
56. Mowery D.C., Nelson R.R., Sampat B.N., Ziedonis A.A. The effects of Bayh-Dole Act on US university research and technology transfer. Industrializing knowledge: University-industry linkages in Japan and the United States 1999, 269-306. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. L.M. Branscomb, F. Kadama, R. Florida (Eds.).
57. Mowery D.C., Sampat B.N., Ziedonis A.A. Learning to patent: Institutional experience, learning, the characteristics of US university patents after the Bayh-Dole Act 1981-1992. Management Science 2002, 48:773-789.
58. McKelvey M., Orsenigo L., Pammolli F. Pharmaceuticals analyzed through the lens of a sectoral innovation system. Sectoral systems of innovation: Concepts, issues, and analyses of six major sectors in Europe 2004, 73-120. Cambridge University Press, New York. F. Malerba (Ed.).
59. North D.C. Structure and change in economic history 1981, Norton, New York.
60. North D.C. Institutions and economic growth: An historical introduction. World Development 1989, 17:1319-1332.
61. Owen-Smith J., Riccaboni M., Pammolli F., Powell W.W. A Comparison of U.S. and European University-Industry Relations in the Life Sciences. Management Science 2002, 48:24-43.
62. Powell W.W., Doput K.W., Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 1996, 41:116-145.
63. Pyenson L., Sheets-Pyenson S. Servants of nature: A history of scientific institutions, enterprises, and sensibilities 1999, Norton, New York.
64. Rezaie R., Frew S.E., Sammut S.M., Maliakkal M.R., Daar A.S., Singer P.A. Brazilian health biotech-Fostering crosstalk between public and private sectors. Nature Biotechnology 2008, 26:627-644.
65. Rodriguez A., Dahlman C., Salmi J. Knowledge and innovation for competitiveness in Brazil 2008, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
66. Romer P. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 1986, 94:1002-1037.
67. Romer P. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 1990, 98:71-102.
68. Runge C.F. Exclusion, inclusion, and enclosure: Historical commons and modern intellectual property. World Development 2006, 34:1713-1727.
69. Ryan M.P. Knowledge diplomacy: Global competition and the politics of intellectual property 1995, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
70. Sampat B.N. Patenting and US Academic research in the twentieth century: The World Before and after Bayh-Dole. Research Policy 2006, 35:772-789.
71. Schane S. Selling university technology: Patterns from MIT. Management Science 2002, 48:122-137.
72. Scherer F.M. The political economy of patent policy reform in the United States. Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law 2009, 7:167-216.
73. Scherer F.M., Harhoff D. Technology policy for a World of skew-distributed outcomes. Research Policy 2000, 29:559-566.
74. Scherer F.M., Weisburst S. Economic effects of strengthening pharmaceutical patent protection in Italy. International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law 1995, 26:1009-1024.
75. Sell S. Intellectual property protection and antitrust in the developing World: Crisis, coercion, and choice. International Organization 1995, 49:315-350.
76. Sell S. Power and ideas: North-Politics of intellectual property and antitrust 1998, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
77. Shavell S., Van Ypersele T. Rewards versus intellectual property rights. Journal of Law and Economics 2001, 44:525-547.
78. Teece D.J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy. Research Policy 1987, 15:285-305.
79. Teece D.J. Managing intellectual capital 2000, Oxford University Press, New York.
80. Thursby J.G., Thursby M.C. Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. Management Science 2002, 48:90-104.
81. Treisman D. Stabilization tactics in Latin America: Menem, cardoso, and the politics of low inflation. Comparative Politics 2004, 36:399-419.
82. United States Trade Representative. (1995). Special 301 Report. Washington, DC.
83. United States Trade Representative. (1996). Special 301 Report. Washington, DC.
84. Walsh J.P., Arora A., Cohen W.M. Working through the patent problem. Science 2003, 299:1020.
85. Walsh J.P., Cohen W.M., Cho C. Where excludability matters: Material versus intellectual property in academic biomedical research. Research Policy 2007, 36:1184-1203.
86. How universities promote economic promote economic growth 2007, The World Bank, Washington, DC. S. Yusuf, K. Nabeshima (Eds.).
87. Zucker L.G., Darby M.R., Armstrong J.S. Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science 2002, 48:138-153.