Opening the Ivory Tower to Business: University-Industry Linkages and the Development of Knowledge-Intensive Clusters in Asian Cities

World Development

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 931-940

  Hershberg, Eric ^a   Nabeshima, Kaoru ^b   Yusuf, Shahid ^b  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b WORLD BANK   (United States)

Author keywords

Asia; innovation system; research and development; university industry linkages; urban economies

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249033113     PISSN: 0305750X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.05.006     Document Type: Editorial

References (28)

1. Agrawal A., and Cockburn I. The anchor tenant hypothesis: Exploring the role of large, local, R&D-intensive firms in regional innovation systems. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21 9 (2003) 1227-1253
2. Altbach P.G., and Umakoshi T. Asian universities: Historical perspectives and contemporary challenges (2004), The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD
3. Aniello V. Grenoble Valley. In: Crouch C., Le Galés P., Trigilia C., and Voelzkow H. (Eds). Changing governance of local economies: Responses of European local production systems (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
4. Appleseed. Engines of economic growth: The economic impact of Boston's eight research universities on the metropolitan Boston area (2003), Appleseed, Boston, MA
5. Arocena R., and Sutz J. Changing knowledge production and Latin American universities. Research Policy 30 8 (2001) 1221-1234
6. Cosh A.D., Lester R.K., and Hughes A. UK Plc: Just how innovative are we? (2006), Cambridge-MIT Institute, Cambridge, UK and Cambridge, MA
7. D'Costa, A. (2005). Exports, university-industry linkages, and innovation challenges in Bangalore, India. Presented at Conference on university industry linkages in metropolitan areas in Asia, Washington, DC, November 17, 2005.
8. Doner R.F., and Hershberg E. Flexible production and political decentralization in the developing world: Elective affinities in the pursuit of competitiveness?. Studies in Comparative International Development 34 1 (1999) 45-82
9. Dumais, G., Ellison, G., & Glaeser, E. L. (1997). Geographic concentration as a dynamic process. NBER Working Paper 6270. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
10. Etzkowitz H. MIT and the rise of entrepreneurial science (2002), Routledge, London
11. Etzkowitz H., Webster A., Gebhardt C., and Cantisano Terra B.R. The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy 29 2 (2000) 313-330
12. Feldman M.P., and Desrochers P. Truth for its own sake: Academic culture and technology transfer at Johns Hopkins University. Minerva 42 2 (2004) 105-126
13. Gaspar J., and Glaeser E.L. Information technology and the future of cities. Journal of Urban Economics 43 1 (1998) 136-156
14. Hu M.-C., and Mathews J.A. National innovative capacity in east Asia. Research Policy 34 9 (2005) 1322-1349
15. In: Huber E. (Ed). Models of capitalism: Lessons for Latin America (2002), Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA
16. Kim S. Urban development in the United States, 1690-1990. Southern Economic Journal 66 4 (2000) 855-880
17. Lecuyer C. What do universities really owe industry? The case of solid state electronics at Stanford. Minerva 43 1 (2005) 51-71
18. Leiponen A. Skills and innovation. International Journal of Industrial Organization 23 5-6 (2005) 303-323
19. Lenoir, T., Rosenberg, N., Rowen, H., Lecuyer, C., Colyvas, J., & Goldfarb, B. (2003). Inventing the entrepreneurial University: Stanford and the co-evolution of Silicon Valley. Working Paper. Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
20. Mowery D.C., Nelson R.R., Sampat B.N., and Ziedonis A.A. Ivory tower and industrial innovation: University-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States (2004), Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA
21. O'Mara M.P. Cities of knowledge: Cold war science and the search for the next Silicon Valley (2005), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
22. Proudfoot N. The biopharmaceutical cluster in Oxford. In: Crouch C., Le Galés P., Trigilia C., and Voelzkow H. (Eds). Changing governance of local economies: Responses of European local production systems (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
23. Rosenberg N. America's entrepreneurial universities. In: Hart D.M. (Ed). The emergence of entrepreneurship policy: Governance, start-ups, and growth in the U.S. knowledge economy (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 113
24. Saperstein J., and Rouach D. Creating regional wealth in the innovation economy: Models, perspectives, and best practices (2002), Prentice Hall Books, Upper Saddle River, NJ
25. Siegel D.S., Westhead P., and Wright M. Assessing the impact of university science parks on research productivity: Exploratory firm-level evidence from the United Kingdom. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21 9 (2003) 1357-1369
26. Smilor, R., O'Donnell, N., Stein, G., & Welborn, R. (2005). The research university and the development of high technology centers in the U.S. Presented at Conference on university industry linkages in metropolitan areas in Asia, Washington, DC, November 17, 2005.
27. In: Weyland K. (Ed). Learning from foreign models in Latin American policy reform (2004), Woodrow Wilson Center Press, Washington, DC
28. Yusuf S., Altaf M.A., Eichengreen B., Gooptu S., Nabeshima K., Kenny C., et al. Innovative East Asia: The future of growth (2003), Oxford University Press, New York