Patenting and US academic research in the 20th century: The world before and after Bayh-Dole

Research Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 772-789

  Sampat, Bhaven N ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayh dole; Patents; Technology transfer; Universities

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; BAYH-DOLE; COMMERCIALISATION; UNIVERSITIES;

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

EID: 33745256993     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Agrawal A., and Henderson R. Putting patents in context: exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science 48 (2002) 44-60
2. Apple R. Vitamania: Vitamins in American Culture (1996), Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick
3. Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM), 1998. The AUTM Licensing Survey, Survey Summary. AUTM, Norwalk, CT.
4. Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM), 2002. The AUTM Licensing Survey, FY 2001. AUTM, Norwalk, CT.
5. Broad W. Patent bill returns bright idea to inventor (in news and comment). Science 205 (1979) 473-476
6. Broad W. Whistle blower reinstated at HEW. Science 205 (1979) 476
7. Bush V. Science: The Endless Frontier (1945), US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
8. Bush V. The Kilgore bill. Science 98 (1943) 571-577
9. Cameron F. Cottrell: Samaritan of Science (1993), Research Corporation, Tucson
10. Carnegie Commission, 1973. Carnegie Commission on Higher Education, A Classification of Institutions of Higher Education: A Technical Report. Carnegie Commission, Berkeley.
11. Cohen W.M., Nelson R.R., and Walsh J.P. Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D. Management Science 48 (2002) 1-23
12. Colyvas J., Crow M., Gelijns A., Mazzoleni R., Nelson R.R., Rosenberg N., and Sampat B.N. How do university inventions get into practice?. Management Science 48 (2002) 61-72
13. Cottrell F. The research corporation, an experiment in the public administration of patent rights. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 4 (1912) 865
14. Cottrell F. Patent experience of the research corporation. Transactions of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (1932) 222
15. Crane D. Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities (1972), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
16. Dasgupta P., and David P.A. Towards a new economics of science. Research Policy 23 (1994) 487-521
17. David P.A. The economic logic of 'open science' and the balance between private property rights and the public domain in scientific data and information. In: Esau J.M., and Uhli P.F. (Eds). The Role of Scientific and Technical Data and Information in the Public Domain (2003), National Academies Press, Washington, DC 19-34
18. de Solla Price D. Little Science, Big Science (1963), Columbia University Press, New York
19. Eisenberg R. Public research and private development: patents and technology transfer in government-sponsored research. Virginia Law Review 82 (1996) 1663-1727
20. Eisenberg R., and Nelson R. Public vs. proprietary science: a fruitful tension?. Daedalus 131 (2002) 89-101
21. Eskridge N. Dole blasts HEW for 'Stonewalling' patent applications. Bioscience 28 (1978) 605-606
22. Etzkowitz H. Knowledge as property: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Debate of Academic Patent Policy. Minerva 32 (1994) 383-421
23. Fishman E.A. MIT Patent Policy 1932-1946: Historical Precedents in University-Industry Technology Transfer (1996), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
24. Forman H.I. Patents: Their Ownership and Administration by the United States Government (1957), Central Book Company, New York
25. Gambardella A. Science and Innovation (1995), Cambridge University Press, New York
26. Harbridge House Inc., 1968a. Effects of government policy on commercial utilization and business competition, in: Government Patent Policy Study, Final Report. Federal Council for Science and Technology, Washington, DC.
27. Henderson R., Jaffe A.B., and Trajtenberg M. Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988. Review of Economics and Statistics (1998) 119-127
28. Henig R. New patent policy bill gathers congressional support. Bioscience 29 (1979) 281-284
29. Jensen R., and Thursby M. Proofs and prototypes for sale: the licensing of university inventions. American Economic Review 91 (2001) 240-258
30. Kevles D. The National science foundation and the debate over postwar research policy, 1942-1945. Isis 68 (1977) 5-26
31. Kevles, D.J. 1990. Principles and Politics in Federal R&D Policy, 1945-1990: An Appreciation of the Bush Report. National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.
32. Kitcher P. The Advancement of Science (1993), Oxford University Press, New York
33. Merges R., and Nelson R. On limiting or encouraging rivalry in technical progress: the effect of patent scope decisions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 25 (1994) 1-24
34. Merton R.K. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1973), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
35. Mowery D., and Sampat B. Patenting and licensing university inventions: lessons from the history of the research corporation. Industrial and Corporate Change 10 (2001) 317-355
36. Mowery D.C., and Sampat B. University patents, patent policies, and patent policy debates, 1925-1980. Industrial and Corporate Change 10 (2001) 781-814
37. Mowery D., Nelson R., Sampat B., and Ziedonis A. The Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University Patenting Before and After Bayh-Dole (2004), Stanford University Press, Palo Alto
38. Mowery D.C., Nelson R.R., Sampat B.N., and Ziedonis A.A. The growth of patenting and licensing by us universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. Research Policy 30 (2001) 99-119
39. Mowery D.C., Sampat B.N., and Ziedonis A.A. Learning to patent: institutional experience and the quality of university patents. Management Science 48 (2002) 73-89
40. Mowery, D.C., Ziedonis, A.A. 2001. The Geographic Reach of Market and Nonmarket Channels of Technology Transfer: Comparing Citations and Licenses of University Patents. NBER Working Paper 8568.
41. Nelson R. The market economy and the republic of science. Draft (2002)
42. OECD, 2002. Benchmarking Science-Industry Relationships. OECD, Paris.
43. Polanyi M. The republic of science: its political and economic theory. Minerva 1 (1962) 54-74
44. Rai, A.T., Eisenberg, R.S. 2002. The Public and the Private in Biopharmaceutical Research Paper prepared for the Conference on the Public Domain, Duke University.
45. Reimers, N. 1998. Stanford's Office of Technology Licensing and the Cohen/Boyer Cloning Patents, An Oral History Conducted in 1997 by Sally Smith Hughes, Ph.D., Regional Oral History Office. The Bancroft Library, Berkeley, CA. Available online at: http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/kt4b69n6sc.
46. Rosenberg N., and Nelson R.R. American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy 23 (1994) 323-348
47. Rosenberg, N. 2001. American Universities As Economic Institutions. Draft Manuscript.
48. Sampat, B.N. 2002. The Effects of Bayh-Dole on Technology Transfer and the Academic Enterprise: A Survey of the Empirical Literature. Draft Manuscript.
49. Sampat, B.N. 2003. Examiner Citations: A First Look. Draft Manuscript.
50. Sampat B.N., Mowery D., and Ziedonis A. Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: a re-examination. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21 (2003) 1371-1390
51. Sampat B.N., and Nelson R.R. The emergence and standardization of university technology transfer offices: a case study of institutional change. Advances in Strategic Management 19 (2002) 135-164
52. Stokes D.E. Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation (1997), Brookings Institute, Washington, DC
53. Thursby J., Jensen R., and Thursby M. Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: a survey of major us universities. Journal of Technology Transfer 26 (2001) 59-72
54. Trajtenberg M., Henderson R., and Jaffe A.B. University versus corporate patents: a window on the basicness of inventions. Economics of Innovation and New Technology (1997) 19-50
55. Trune D., and Goslin L. University technology transfer programs: a profit/loss analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 57 (1998) 197-204
56. US Department of Justice, 1947. Investigation of Government Patent Practices and Policies: Report and Recommendations of the Attorney General to the President. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
57. US General Accounting Office, 1968. Problem Areas Affecting Usefulness of Results of Government-Sponsored Research in Medicinal Chemistry: A Report to the Congress. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
58. US Office of Management and Budget, 1963. Memorandum and Statement of Government Patent Policy. Federal Register 28, 10943-10946.
59. US Office of Management and Budget, 1971. Memorandum and Statement of Government Patent Policy. Federal Register 36, 16886.
60. United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary, 1979. The University and Small Business Patent Procedures Act: Hearings on S. 414, May 16 and June 6, in: Proceedings of the 96th Congress, 1st Session. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
61. Walsh J., Cohen W., and Arora A. Patenting and licensing of research tools and biomedical innovation. In: Levin R., Merrill S., and Meyers M. (Eds). Innovation in a Knowledge Based Economy (2003), National Academies Press, Washington 285-340
62. Weissman, R. 1989. Public Finance, Private Gain: The Emerging University-Business-Government Alliance and the New US Technological Order. Harvard University Undergraduate Thesis.
63. Ziman J.M. Public Knowledge: An Essay Concerning the Social Dimension of Science (1968), Cambridge University Press, London