Parameter identifiability of power-law biochemical system models

Journal of Biotechnology

Volumn 149, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 132-140

  Srinath, Sridharan ^a   Gunawan, Rudiyanto ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Biochemical Systems Theory; Confidence region; Identifiability analysis; Inverse modeling; Power law models

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMICAL SYSTEMS THEORY; CONFIDENCE REGION; IDENTIFIABILITY ANALYSIS; INVERSE MODELING; POWER LAW MODEL;

INVERSE PROBLEMS; SYSTEM THEORY;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BIOCHEMISTRY; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CANONICAL ANALYSIS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 77954190584     PISSN: 01681656     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.02.019     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Balsa-Canto E., Alonso A.A., Banga J.R. Computational procedures for optimal experimental design in biological systems. IET Systems Biology 2008, 2:163-172.
2. Banga J.R., Balsa-Canto E. Parameter estimation and optimal experimental design. Essays in Biochemistry 2008, 45:195-209.
3. Beck J.V., Arnold K.J. Parameter Estimation in Engineering and Science 1977, Wiley, New York.
4. Boyd S., Ghaoui L.E., Feron E., Balakrishnan V. Linear Matrix Inequality in System and Control Theory 1994, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadephia.
5. Carson E.R., Cobelli C., Finkelstein L. The Mathematical Modeling of Metabolic and Endocrine Systems: Model Formulation, Identification, and Validation 1983, J. Wiley, New York.
6. Cho K.H., Shin S.Y., Kolch W., Wolkenhauer O. Experimental Design in Systems Biology, Based on Parameter Sensitivity Analysis Using a Monte Carlo Method: A Case Study for the TNF?-Mediated NF-?B Signal Transduction Pathway. Simulation 2003, 79:726-739.
7. Chou I.C., Voit E.O. Recent developments in parameter estimation and structure identification of biochemical and genomic systems. Mathematical Biosciences 2009, 219:57-83.
8. Chu Y., Hahn J. Parameter set selection via clustering of parameters into pairwise indistinguishable groups of parameters. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 2009, 48:6000-6009.
9. Del Rosario R.C.H., Mendoza E., Voit E.O. Challenges in lin-log modelling of glycolysis in Lactococcus lactis. IET Systems Biology 2008, 2:136-149.
10. Emery A.F., Nenarokomov A.V. Optimal experiment design. Measurement Science and Technology 1998, 9:864-876.
11. Gadkar K.G., Gunawan R., Doyle F.J. Iterative approach to model identification of biological networks. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6:155.
12. Godfrey K.R. The identifiability of parameters of models used in biomedicine. Mathematical Modelling 1986, 7:1195-1214.
13. Gunawan R., Gadkar K.G., Doyle F.J. Methods to identify cellular architecture and dynamics from experimental data. Systems Modelling in Cellular Biology: From Concepts to Nuts and Bolts 2006, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Z. Szallasi, J. Stelling, V. Periwal (Eds.).
14. Hatzimanikatis V., Bailey J.E. MCA has more to say. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1996, 182:233-242.
15. Hengl S., Kreutz C., Timmer J., Maiwald T. Data-based identifiability analysis of non-linear dynamical models. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:2612-2618.
16. Hernández-Bermejo B., Fairén V. Lotka-Volterra representation of general nonlinear systems. Mathematical Biosciences 1997, 140:1-32.
17. Hlavacek W.S., Savageau M.A. Rules for coupled expression of regulator and effector genes in inducible circuits. Journal of Molecular Biology 1996, 255:121-139.
18. Ingalls B. Sensitivity analysis: from model parameters to system behaviour. Essays in Biochemistry 2008, 45:177-193.
19. Jimenez-Hornero J.E., Santos-Duenas I.M., Garcia-Garcia I. Structural identifiability of a model for the acetic acid fermentation process. Mathematical Biosciences 2008, 216:154-162.
20. Kimura S., Hatakeyama M., Konagaya A. Inference of S-system models of genetic networks from noisy time-series data. Chem-Bio Informatics Journal 2004, 4:1-14.
21. Kitano H. Computational systems biology. Nature 2002, 420:206-210.
22. Kitano H. Systems biology: a brief overview. Science 2002, 295:1662-1664.
23. Ko C.L., Wang F.S., Chao Y.P., Chen T.W. S-system approach to modeling recombinant Escherichia coli growth by hybrid differential evolution with data collocation. Biochemical Engineering Journal 2006, 28:10-16.
24. Landaw E.M., DiStefano J.J. Multiexponential, multicompartmental, and noncompartmental modeling. II. Data analysis and statistical considerations. The American Journal of Physiology 1984, 246:R665-R677.
25. Marino S., Voit E.O. An automated procedure for the extraction of metabolic network information from time series data. Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology 2006, 4:665-691.
26. Nikerel I.E., van Winden W.A., Verheijen P.J.T., Heijnen J.J. Model reduction and a priori kinetic parameter identifiability analysis using metabolome time series for metabolic reaction networks with linlog kinetics. Metab Eng 2008.
27. Raue A., Kreutz C., Maiwald T., Bachmann J., Schilling M., Klingmller U., Timmer J. Structural and practical identifiability analysis of partially observed dynamical models by exploiting the profile likelihood. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:1923-1929.
28. Seber G.A.F., Wild C.J. Nonlinear Regression 1989, Wiley, New York.
29. Sorribas A., Cascante M. Structure identifiability in metabolic pathways: parameter estimation in models based on the power-law formalism. Biochemical Journal 1994, 298:303-311.
30. Sorribas A., Hernández-Bermejo B., Vilaprinyo E., Alves R. Cooperativity and saturation in biochemical networks: a saturable formalism using Taylor series approximations. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2007, 97:1259-1277.
31. Sorribas A., Savageau M.A. Strategies for representing metabolic pathways within biochemical systems theory: reversible pathways. Mathematical Biosciences 1989, 94:239-269.
32. Turányi T. Sensitivity analysis of complex kinetic systems. Tools and applications. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry 1990, 5:203-248.
33. van Riel N.A.W. Dynamic modelling and analysis of biochemical networks: mechanism-based models and model-based experiments. Briefings in Bioinformatics 2006, 7:364-374.
34. Varma A., Morbidelli M., Wu H. Parametric Sensitivity in Chemical Systems 1999, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.; New York, NY.
35. Vera J., Balsa-Canto E., Wellstead P., Banga J.R., Wolkenhauer O. Power-law models of signal transduction pathways. Cellular Signalling 2007, 19:1531-1541.
36. Vilela M., Vinga S., Maia M., Voit E., Almeida J. Identification of neutral biochemical network models from time series data. BMC Systems Biology 2009, 3:47.
37. Voit E.O., Almeida J. Decoupling dynamical systems for pathway identification from metabolic profiles. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:1670-1681.
38. Voit E.O., Almeida J., Marino S., Lall R., Goel G., Neves A.R., Santos H. Regulation of glycolysis in Lactococcus lactis: an unfinished systems biological case study. Systematic Biology (Stevenage) 2006, 153:286-298.
39. Voit E.O., Ferreira A. Computational Analysis of Biochemical Systems: A Practical Guide for Biochemists and Molecular Biologists 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
40. Yao K.Z., Shaw B.M., Kou B., McAuley K.B., Bacon D.W. Modeling ethylene/butene copolymerization with multi-site catalysts: parameter estimability and experimental design. Polymer Reaction Engineering 2003, 11:563-588.
41. Zak D.E., Gonye G.E., Schwaber J.S., Doyle F.J. Importance of input perturbations and stochastic gene expression in the reverse engineering of genetic regulatory networks: Insights from an identifiability analysis of an in silico network. Genome Research 2003, 13:2396-2405.