Biases of spatial attention in vision and audition

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 229-235

  Sosa, Yamaya ^a   Teder Sälejärvi, Wolfgang A ^a   McCourt, Mark E ^a  

^a NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Audiospatial attention; Line bisection; Pseudoneglect; Visuospatial attention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHENOMENOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDONEGLECT; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REFERENCE VALUES; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954175682     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Anderson B. A mathematical model of line bisection behavior in neglect. Brain 1996, 119:841-850.
2. Bellman A., Meuli R., Clarke S. Two types of auditory neglect. Brain 2001, 124:676-687.
3. Bisiach E. Unilateral neglect and the structure of space representation. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1996, 5:62-65.
4. Bisiach E., Bulgarelli C., Sterzi R., Vallar G. Line bisection and cognitive plasticity of unilateral neglect of space. Brain and Cognition 1983, 2:32-38.
5. Bisiach E., Capitani E., Columbo A., Spinnler H. Halving a horizontal segment: A study on hemisphere-damaged patients with focal cerebral lesions. Archs. Suisses de Neurologie, Neurochirguire et de Psychaitre 1976, 118:199-206.
6. Bisiach E., Cornacchia L., Sterzi R., Vallar G. Disorders of perceived auditory lateralization after lesions of the right hemisphere. Brain 1984, 107:37-52.
7. Blauert J. The psychophysics of human sound localization (revised edition) 1996, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
8. Bowers D., Heilman K.M. Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia 1980, 18:491-498.
9. Bradshaw J.L., Nathan G., Nettleton N.C., Wilson L., Pierson J. Why is there a left side underestimation in rod bisection?. Neuropsychologia 1987, 25:735-738.
10. Brodie E.E., Pettigrew L.E.L. Is left always right? Directional deviations in visual line bisection as a function of hand and initial scanning direction. Neuropsychologia 1996, 34:467-470.
11. Calvert G.A., Spence C., Stein B.E. The handbook of multisensory processes 2004, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
12. Charles J., Sahraie A., McGeorge P. Hemispatial asymmetries in judgment of stimulus size. Perception & Psychophysics 2007, 69:687-698.
13. Chokron S., Bartolomeo P., Perenin M., Helft G., Imbert M. Scanning direction and line bisection: A study of normal subjects and unilateral neglect patients with opposite reading habits. Cognitive Brain Research 1998, 7:173-178.
14. Chokron S., Imbert M. Egocentric reference and asymmetric perception of space. Neuropsychologia 1993, 31:267-275.
15. Chokron S., Imbert M. Influence of reading habits on line bisection. Cognitive Brain Research 1993, 1:219-222.
16. Clarke S., Bellmann A., Meuli R.A., Assal G., Steck A.J. Auditory agnosia and auditory spatial deficits following left hemispheric lesions: Evidence for distinct processing pathways. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38:797-807.
17. Clarke S., Thiran A.B., Maeder P., Adriani M., Vernet O., Regli L., et al. What and where in human audition: Selective deficits following focal hemispheric lesions. Experimental Brain Research 2002, 147:8-15.
18. Cohen J. Statistical power for the behavioral sciences 1988, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. 2nd ed.
19. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 1992, 112:155-159.
20. Corral M.-J., Escera C. Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction. NeuroReport 2008, 19:1535-1539.
21. Cusak R., Carlyon R.P., Robertson I.H. Auditory midline and spatial discrimination in patients with unilateral neglect. Cortex 2001, 37:706-709.
22. Deouell L.Y., Bentin S., Giard M.H. Mismatch negativity in dichotic listening: Evidence for interhemispheric differences and multiple generators. Psychophysiology 1998, 35:355-365.
23. Dickinson C.A., Intraub H. Spatial asymmetries in viewing and remembering scenes: Consequences of an attentional bias?. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 2009, 71:1251-1262.
24. Driver J., Baylis G.C., Goodrich S.J., Rafal R.D. Axis-based neglect of visual shapes. Neuropsychologia 1994, 11:1353-1365.
25. Dufour A., Touzalin P., Candas V. Rightward shift of the auditory subjective straight ahead in right- and left-handed subjects. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:47-453.
26. Foxe J.J., McCourt M.E., Javitt D.C. Right hemisphere control of visuospatial attention: Line-bisection judgments evaluated with high-density electrical mapping and source analysis. NeuroImage 2003, 19:710-726.
27. Gitelman D.R., Nobre A.C., Parrish T.B., LaBar K.S., Kim Y.H., Meyer J.R., et al. A large-scale distributed network for covert spatial attention: Further anatomical delineation based on stringent behavioral and cognitive controls. Brain 1999, 122:1093-1106.
28. Halligan P.W., Manning L., Marshall J.C. Hemispheric activation versus spatio-motor cueing in visual neglect: A case study. Neuropsychologia 1991, 29:165-176.
29. Heilman K.M., Valenstein E. Frontal lobe neglect in man. Neurology 1972, 22:660-664.
30. Heilman K.M., Valenstein E. Auditory neglect in man. Archives of Neurology 1972, 26:32-35.
31. Heilman K.M., Valenstein E. Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Annals of Neurology 1979, 5:166-170.
32. Hine J., Debener S. Late auditory evoked potentials asymmetry revisited. Clinical Neurophysiology 2007, 118:1274-1285.
33. Hugdahl K., Wester K., Asbjornsen A. Auditory neglect after right frontal lobe and right pulvinar thalamic lesions. Brain & Language 1991, 41:465-473.
34. Jewell G., McCourt M.E. Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38:93-110.
35. Kaiser J., Lutzenberger W., Preissl H., Ackermann H., Birbaumer N. Right-hemisphere dominance for the processing of sound-source lateralization. Journal of Neuroscience 2000, 20:6631-6639.
36. Karnath H.O., Schenkel P., Fischer B. Trunk orientation as the determining factor of the " contralateral" deficit in the neglect syndrome and as the physical anchor of the internal representation of body orientation in space. Brain 1991, 114:1997-2014.
37. Kastner S., Ungerleider L.G. Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2000, 23:315-341.
38. Kelley T.A., Serences J.T., Giesbrecht B., Yantis S. Cortical mechanisms for shifting and holding visuospatial attention. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18:114-125.
39. Kerkhoff G., Artinger F., Ziegler W. Contrasting spatial hearing deficits in hemianopia and spatial neglect. NeuroReport 1999, 10:3555-3560.
40. Kinsbourne M. The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychologica 1970, 33:193-201.
41. Kinsbourne M. Hemi-neglect and hemisphere rivalry. Advances in Neurology 1977, 18:41-49.
42. Kinsbourne M. Orientational bias model of unilateral neglect: Evidence from attentional gradients within hemispace 1993, 63-86. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hove, UK. Unilateral neglect: Clinical and experimental studies, I.H. Robertson, J.C. Marshall (Eds.).
43. Krumbholz K., Hewson-Stoate N., Schonwiesner M. Cortical response to auditory motion suggests an asymmetry in the reliance on inter-hemispheric connections between the left and right auditory corticies. Journal of Neurophysiology 2007, 97:1649-1655.
44. Krumbholz K., Nobis E.A., Weatheritt R.J., Fink G.R. Executive control of spatial attention shifts in the auditory compared to the visual modality. Human Brain Mapping 2009, 30:1457-1469.
45. Krumbholz K., Schonwiesner M., von Cramon D.Y., Rubsamen R., Shah N.J., Ziles K., et al. Representation of interaural temporal information from left and right auditory space in the human planum temporale and inferior parietal lobe. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15:317-324.
46. Leone L., McCourt M.E. The effect of acute alcohol challenge on global visuospatial attention: Exaggeration of leftward bias in line bisection. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition 2010, 15:327-342.
47. Levy J., Heller W. Perception and expression of emotion in right-handers and left-handers. Neuropsychologia 1981, 19:263-272.
48. Luh K.E., Rueckert L.M., Levy J. Perceptual asymmetries for free viewing of several types of chimeric stimuli. Brain and Cognition 1991, 16:83-103.
49. McCourt M.E. Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39:1065-1076.
50. McCourt M.E., Freeman P., Tahmahkera-Stevens C., Chaussee M. The influence of unimanual response on pseudoneglect magnitude. Brain and Cognition 2001, 45:52-63.
51. McCourt M.E., Garlinghouse M. Stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect: Effect of line geometry. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38:520-524.
52. McCourt M.E., Garlinghouse M. Asymmetries of visuospatial attention are modulated by viewing distance and visual field elevation: Pseudoneglect in peripersonal and extrapersonal space. Cortex 2000, 36:715-732.
53. McCourt M.E., Garlinghouse M., Butler J. The influence of viewing eye on pseudoneglect magnitude. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2001, 7:391-395.
54. McCourt M.E., Garlinghouse M., Reuter-Lorenz P.A. A common origin for the effects of unilateral cueing and line geometry in the modulation of pseudoneglect. Cortex 2005, 41:499-511.
55. McCourt M.E., Garlinghouse M., Slater J. Centripetal versus centrifugal bias in visual line bisection: Focusing attention on two hypotheses. Frontiers in Bioscience 2000, 5:d58-71.
56. McCourt M.E., Jewell G. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: Stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37:843-855.
57. McCourt M.E., Olafson C. Cognitive and perceptual influences on visual line bisection: Psychophysical and chronometric analyses of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia 1997, 35:369-380.
58. McCourt M.E., Shpaner M., Javitt D.C., Foxe J.J. Hemispheric asymmetry and callosal integration of visuospatial attention in schizophrenia: A tachistoscopic line bisection study. Schizophrenia Research 2008, 102(1-3):189-196.
59. Mesulam M.M. A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Annals of Neurology 1981, 10:309-325.
60. Mesulam M.M. Attentional networks, confusional states, and neglect syndromes. Principles of behavioral and cognitive neurology 2000, 174-256. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 2nd ed. M.M. Mesulam (Ed.).
61. Nelder J.A., Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Computer Journal 1965, 7:308-313.
62. Nicholls M.E.R., Bradshaw J.L., Mattingley J.B. Free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of shade, numerosity and size. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37:307-314.
63. Nicholls M.E.R., Roberts G.R. Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases?. Cortex 2002, 38:113-136.
64. Nobre A.C., Sebestyen G.N., Gitelman D.R., Mesulam M.M., Frackowiak R.S., Frith C.D. Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography. Brain 1997, 120:515-533.
65. Oldfield R. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
66. Pavani F., Husain M., Ladavas E., Driver J. Auditory deficits in visuospatial neglect patients. Cortex 2004, 40:347-365.
67. Petit L., Simon G., Joliot M., Andersson F., Bertin T., Zago L., et al. Right hemisphere dominance for auditory attention and its modulation by eye position: An event related fMRI study. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2007, 25:211-225.
68. Richter N., Schroger E., Rubsamen R. Hemispheric specialization during discrimination of sound sources reflected by the MMN. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:2652-2659.
69. Schonwiesner M., Krumbholz K., Rubsamen R., Fink G.R., von Cramon D.Y. Hemispheric asymmetry for auditory processing in the human auditory brain stem, thalamus, and cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17:492-499.
70. Sosa, Y., Clarke, A., & McCourt, M. E. (2009). Multisensory cue integration in audiovisual spatial localization. Journal of Vision, 9(8), 722a. doi:. http://journalofvision.org/9/8/722/.
71. Stein B.E., Meredith M.A. The merging of the senses 1993, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
72. Vallar G., Guariglia C., Nico D., Bisiach E. Spatial hemineglect in back space. Brain 1995, 118:467-472.
73. Vallar G., Perani D. The anatomy of neglect after right hemisphere stroke lesions: A clinical CT scan correlation study in man. Neuropsychology 1986, 24:609-622.
74. Watson R.T., Valenstein E., Heilman K.M. Thalamic neglect. Archives of Neurology 1981, 38:501-506.
75. Yamaguchi S., Tsuchiya H., Kobayashi S. Electrophysiologic correlates of visuo-spatial attention shift. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1995, 94:450-461.
76. Zatorre R.J., Bouffard M., Ahad P., Belin P. Where is 'where' in the human auditory cortex?. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5:905-909.