Mismatch negativity in dichotic listening: Evidence for interhemispheric differences and multiple generators

Psychophysiology

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 355-365

  Deouell, Leon Y ^a   Bentin, Shlomo ^a   Giard, Marie Helene ^b  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

Auditory attention; Dichotic listening; Event related potential; Interhemispheric asymmetry; Mismatch negativity; Scalp current densities

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN ASYMMETRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; DICHOTIC LISTENING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED CORTICAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; GENERATOR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LOUDNESS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEMPORAL LOBE;

EID: 0031748878     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0048577298970287     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Aaltonen, O., Niemi, P., Nyrke, T., & Tuhkanen, M. (1987). Event related brain potentials and the perception of a phonetic continuum. Biological Psychology, 24, 197-207.
2. Alain, C., Woods, D. L., & Ogawa, K. H. (1994). Brain indices of automatic pattern processing. NeuroReport, 6, 140-144.
3. Alho, K. (1995). Cerebral generators of mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic counterpart (MMNm) elicited by sound changes. Ear and Hearing, 16, 38-51.
4. Alho, K., Woods, D. L., Algazi, A., Knight, R. T., & Näätänen, R. (1994). Lesions of frontal cortex diminish the auditory mismatch negativity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 91, 353-362.
5. Anzola, G. P., Bertoloni, G., Buchtel, H. A., & Rizzolatti, G. (1977). Spatial compatibility and anatomical factors in simple and choice reaction times. Neuropsychologia, 15, 295-302.
6. Carr, C. E., & Konishi, M. (1989). Axonal delay lines for time measurement in the owl's brainstem. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 85, 8311-8315.
7. Cohen, G., & Martin, M. (1975). Hemisphere differences in an auditory Stroop test. Perception and Psychophysics, 17, 79-83.
8. Corbetta, M., Miezin, F. M., Shulman, G. L., & Petersen, S.E. (1993). A PET study of visuospatial attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 1202-1226.
9. Cowan, N., Winkler, I., Teder, W., & Näätänen, R. (1993). Memory prerequisites of mismatch negativity in the auditory event-related potential (ERP). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 909-921.
10. Dennett, D. C., & Kinsbourne, M. (1992). Time and the observer: The where and when of consciousness in the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 183-247.
11. De Renzi, E., Gentilini, M., & Barbieri, C. (1989). Auditory neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 52, 613-617.
12. De Renzi, E., Gentilini, M., & Pattacini, F. (1984). Auditory extinction following hemisphere damage. Neuropsychologia, 22, 733-784.
13. Desmedt, J. E. (1977). Active touch exploration of extrapersonal space elicits specific electrogenesis in the right cerebral hemisphere of intact right handed man. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 74, 4037-4040.
14. Escera, C., Alho, K., Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (in press). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
15. Giard, M. H., Lavikainen, J., Reinikainen, K., Perrin, F., Bertrand, O., Pernier, J., & Näätänen, R. (1995). Separate representation of stimulus frequency, intensity, and duration in auditory sensory memory: An event related potential and dipole-model analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 133-143.
16. Giard, M. H., Perrin, F., & Pernier, J. (1991). Scalp topographies dissociate attentional ERP components during auditory information processing. Acta Otolaryngologica Supplement, 491, 168-175.
17. Giard, M. H., Perrin, F., Pernier, J., & Bouchet, P. (1990). Brain generators implicated in the processing of auditory stimulus deviance: A topographic event related potential study. Psychophysiology, 27, 627-640.
18. Gomes, H., Ritter, W., & Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1995). The nature of pre-attentive storage in the auditory system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 81-94.
19. Halgren, E., Baudena, P., Clarke, J. M., Heit, G., Liegeois, C., Chauvel, P., & Mousolino, A. (1995). Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor stimuli: I. Superior temporal plane and parietal lobe. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 94, 191-220.
20. Hari, R., Hämäläinen, M., Ilmoniemi, R., Kaukoranta, E., Reinikainen, K., Salminen, J., Alho, K., Näätanen, R., & Sams, M. (1984). Responses of the primary auditory cortex to pitch changes in a sequence of tone pips: Neuromagnetic recordings in man. Neuroscience Letters, 50, 127-132.
21. Heilman, K. M., & Valenstein, E. (1972). Auditory neglect in man. Archives of Neurology, 5, 166-170.
22. Heilman, K. M., & Van Den Abell, T. (1980). Right hemisphere dominance for attention: The mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect). Neurology, 30, 327-330.
23. Howes, D., & Boller, F. (1975). Simple reaction time: Evidence for focal impairment from lesions of the right hemisphere. Brain, 98, 317-332.
24. Huotilainen, M., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Levikainen, J., Tiitinen, H., Alho, K., Sinkkonen, J., Knuutila, J., & Näätänen, R. (1993). Interaction between representation of different features of auditory sensory memory. Neuroreport, 4, 1279-1281.
25. Jacobson, G. P., Lombardi, D. M., Gibbens, N. D., Ahmad, B. K., & Newman, G. W. (1992). The effects of stimulus frequency and recording site on the amplitude and latency of multichannel cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP) component N1. Ear and Hearing, 13, 300-306.
26. Kropotov, J. D., Näätänen, R., Sevostianov, A. V., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K., & Kropotova, O. V. (1995). Mismatch negativity to auditory stimulus change recorded directly from the human temporal cortex. Psychophysiology, 32, 418-422.
27. Levänen, S., Ahonen, A., Hari, R., McEvoy, L., & Sams, M. (1996). Deviant auditory stimuli activate human left and right auditory cortex differently. Cerebral Cortex, 6, 288-296.
28. Levänen, S., Hari, R., McEvoy, L., & Sams, M. (1993). Responses of the human auditory cortex to changes in one versus two stimulus features. Experimental Brain Research, 97, 177-183.
29. Lyytinen, H., Blomberg, A. P., & Näätänen, R. (1992). Event related potentials and autonomic responses to a change in unattended auditory stimuli. Psychophysiology, 29, 523-534.
30. Mangun, G. R., Luck, S. J., Plager, R., Loftus, W., Hillyard, S. A., Handy, T., Clark, V. P., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (1994). Monitoring the visual world: Hemispheric asymmetries and subcortical processes in attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 267-275.
31. Milner, B., Taylor, L., & Sperry, R. W. (1968). Lateralized suppression of dichotically presented digits after commissural section in man. Science, 161, 184-185.
32. Näätan̈en, R. (1990). The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 201-288.
33. Näätänen, R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A. W. K., & Mäntysalo, S. (1978). Early selective attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica, 42, 313-329.
35. Näätänen, R., Medvedev, S. V., Pakhomov, M. S., Roudas, M. S., Tervaniemi, M., Reinikainen, K., & Alho, K. (1997). Brain system of attention switch to infrequent sounds. Manuscript submitted for publication.
36. Näätänen, R., & Michie, P. T. (1979). Early selective attention effects on the evoked potential. A critical review and re interpretation. Biological Psychology, 8, 81-136.
37. Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K., & Sams, M. (1987). The mismatch negativity to intensity changes in an auditory stimulus sequence. In R. Johnson, Jr., J. W. Rohrbaugh and R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Current Trends in Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology (Suppl. 40, pp. 125-131.), Amsterdam: Elsevier.
38. Nordby, H., Roth, W. T., & Pfefferbaum, A. (1988). Event-related potentials to breaks in sequences of alternating pitches or interstimulus intervals. Psychophysiology, 25, 262-268.
39. Novak, G., Ritter, W., & Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1992). The chronometry of attention-modulated processing and automatic mismatch detection. Psychophysiology, 29, 412-430.
40. Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K., Sams, M., & Näätänen, R. (1991). Right hemisphere dominance of different mismatch negativities. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 78, 466-479.
41. Paavilainen, P., Karlsson, M. L., Reinikainen, K., & Näätänen, R. (1989). Mismatch negativity to change in spatial location of an auditory stimulus. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 73, 129-141.
42. Pernier, J., Perrin, F., & Bertrand, O. (1988). Scalp current density fields: Concept and properties. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 69, 385-389.
43. Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., & Echallier, J. F. (1989). Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 72, 184-187.
44. Praamstra, P., & Stegeman, D. F. (1992). On the possibility of independent activation of bilateral mismatch negativity (MMN) generators. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 82, 67-80.
45. Ritter, W., Deacon, D., Gomes, H., Javitt, D. C., & Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1995). The mismatch negativity of event-related-potentials as a probe of transient auditory memory: A review. Ear and Hearing, 16, 52-67.
46. Rozenzweig, G. L. (1951). Representations of the two ears at the auditory cortex. American Journal of Physiology, 167, 147-158.
47. Sams, M., Kaukoranta, E., Hämäläinen, M., & Näätänen, R. (1991). Cortical activity elicited by changes in auditory stimuli: Different sources for the magnetic N100m and mismatch responses. Psychophysiology, 28, 21-29.
48. Sams, M., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., & Näätänen, R. (1985). Auditory frequency discrimination and event related potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 62, 437-448.
49. Scherg, M., Vajsar, J., & Picton, T. W. (1989). A source analysis of the late human auditory evoked potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 336-355.
50. Schröger, E. (1995). Processing of auditory deviants with changes in one vs. two stimulus dimensions. Psychophysiology, 32, 55-65.
51. Schröger, E. (1996). A neural mechanism for involuntary attention shifts to changes in auditory stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 527-539.
52. Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1997). Fast preattentive processing of location: A functional basis for selective listening in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 232, 5-8.
53. Sidtis, J. J. (1984). Music, pitch perception, and the mechanics of cortical hearing. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive neuroscience (pp. 91-114). New York: Plenum.
54. Soroker, N., Calamaro, N., Glickson J., & Myslobodsky, M. S. (1997). Auditory inattention in right-hemisphere-damaged patients with and without visual neglect. Neuropsychologia, 35, 249-256.
55. Soroker, N., Calamaro, N., & Myslobodsky, M. S. (1995a). "McGurk illusion" to bilateral administration of sensory stimuli in patients with hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia, 33, 461-470.
56. Soroker, N., Calamaro, N., & Myslobodsky, M. S. (1995b), Ventriloquist effect reinstates responsiveness to auditory stimuli in ignored space in patients with hemispatial neglect. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17, 143-155.
57. Sparks, R., & Geschwind, N. (1968). Dichotic listening in man after section of neocortical commissures. Cortex, 4, 3-16.
58. Springer, S. P., Sidtis, J., Wilson, D., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (1978). Left ear performance in dichotic listening following commissurotomy. Neuropsychohgia, 16, 305-312.
59. Tiitinen, H., Alho., K., Huotilainen, M., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Simola, J., & Näätänen, R. (1993).Tonotopic auditory cortex and the magnetoencephalographic equivalent of the mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology, 50, 537-540.
60. Tiitinen, H., May, P., Reinikainen, K., & Näätänen, R. (1994). Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature, 372, 90-92.
61. Winkler, I., Karmos, G., & Nääänen, R. (1996). Adaptive modeling of the unattended acoustic environment reflected in the mismatch negativity event-related potential. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 239-252.
62. Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1993). Event-related brain potentials to in-frequent partial omissions in series of auditory stimuli. In H. J. Heinze, T. F Münte, & G. R. Mangun (Eds.), New developments in event-related potentials (pp. 219-226). Boston: Birkhäuser.
63. Winkler, I., Paavilainen, P., & Näätänen, R. (1992). Can echoic memory store two traces simultaneously? A study of event related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 29, 337-349.