Explaining internet banking behavior: Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, or technology acceptance model?

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1172-1202

  Yousafzai, Shumaila Y ^a   Foxall, Gordon R ^a   Pallister, John G ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954106866     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00615.x     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991, 50:179-211.
2. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior 1980, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall
3. Ajzen I, Madden J. Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1986, 22:453-474.
4. Aladwani A. Online banking: A field study of drivers, development challenges, and expectations. International Journal of Information Management 2001, 21:213-225.
5. Anderson C, Gerbing W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 1988, 103:411-423.
6. Bagozzi R. A field investigation of causal relations among cognitions, affect, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Marketing Research 1982, 19:562-584.
7. Bagozzi R, Yi Y. The degree of intention formation as a moderator of the attitude-behavior relationship. Social Psychology Quarterly 1989, 52:266-279.
8. Banker R, Kauffman J, Mahmood M. Strategic information technology management: Perspectives on organizational growth and competitive advantage 1993, Hershey, PA, Idea Group
9. Belanger F, Hiller S, Smith J. Trustworthiness in electronic commerce: The role of privacy, security, and site attributes. Journal of Strategic Information System 2002, 11:245-270.
10. Benassi P. TRUSTe: An online privacy seal program. Communications of the ACM 1999, 42:56-57.
11. Bestavros A. Banking industry walks " tightrope" in personalization of Web services. Bank Systems and Technology 2000, 37:54-56.
12. Bhimani A. Securing the commercial Internet. Communications of the ACM 1996, 39:29-35.
13. Chau P, Hu P. Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: A model comparison approach. Decision Sciences 2001, 32:699-710.
14. Chellappa R. Consumers' trust in electronic commerce transactions: The role of perceived privacy and perceived security. 2003, Working Paper). University of Southern California, ebizlab
15. eCommerce Trust Study. 1999, http://www.studioarchetype.com/cheskin/, Cheskin Research, Studio Archetype/Sapient, Retrieved February 1, 2003, from
16. Christie B. Face to file communication: A psychological approach to information systems 1981, New York, Wiley
17. Cook T, Campbell D. Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field setting 1979, Chicago, Rand-McNally
18. Cooper W, Richardson A. Unfair comparisons. Journal of Applied Psychology 1986, 71:179-184.
19. Daniel E. Provision of electronic banking in the UK and the Republic of Ireland. International Journal of Bank Marketing 1999, 17:72-82.
20. Davies J, Foxall G, Pallister J. Beyond the intention-behavior mythology: An integrated model of recycling. Marketing Theory 2002, 2:29-113.
21. Davis F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989, 13:319-340.
22. Davis F, Bagozzi R, Warshaw P. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 1989, 35:982-1003.
23. Dayal S, Landesbeg H, Zeisser M. How to build trust online. Marketing Management 1999, 8:64-69.
24. Doll W, Hendrickson A, Deng X. Using Davis's Perceived Usefulness and Ease-of-Use Instrument for decision making: A confirmatory and multigroup invariance analysis. Decision Sciences 1998, 29:839-869.
25. Eagly A, Chaiken S. The psychology of attitudes 1993, Fort Worth, TX, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
26. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research 1975, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley
27. Fornell C, Larcker D. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 1981, 18:39-50.
28. Foxall G. Marketing psychology: The paradigm in the wings 1997, London, Macmillan
29. Gefen D. Customer loyalty in e-commerce. Journal of the AIS 2002, 3(1):27-51.
30. Gefen D, Straub D. The relative importance of perceived ease-of-use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of the AIS 2000, 1(8):1-28.
31. Gentry L, Calantone R. A comparison of three models to explain shop-bot use on the Web. Psychology and Marketing 2002, 19:945-956.
32. Goodwin C. Privacy: Recognition of a consumer right. Journal of Public Policy Marketing 1991, 10:106-119.
33. Hartwick J, Barki H. Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science 1994, 40:440-465.
34. Hendrickson A, Massey P, Cronan T. On the test-retest reliability of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use scale. MIS Quarterly 1993, 17:227-230.
35. Hoffman D, Novak T, Peralta M. Building consumer trust online. Communications of the ACM 1999, 42(4):80-85.
36. Hosmer L. Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review 1995, 20:379-403.
37. Hu P, Chau P, Sheng O, Tam K. Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems 1999, 16:91-112.
38. Igbaria M, Iivari J, Maragahh H. Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study. Information and Management 1995, 29:227-238.
39. Jarvenpaa S, Tractinsky N. Consumer trust in an Internet store: A cross-cultural validation. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 1999, 5(2):1-36.
40. Jones S, Wilikens M, Morris P, Masera M. Trust requirements in e-business. Communications of the ACM 2000, 43:81-87.
41. Kalakota R, Whinston B. Electronic commerce: A manager's guide 1997, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley
42. Karahanna E, Straub D. The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. Information and Management 1999, 35:237-250.
43. Lassar W, Manolis C, Lassar S. The relationship between consumer innovativeness, personal characteristics, and online banking adoption. International Journal of Bank Marketing 2005, 23:176-199.
44. Lee M, Turban E. A trust model for consumer Internet shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 2001, 6:75-91.
45. Manstead A, Parker D. Evaluating and extending the theory of planned behavior. European Review of Social Psychology 1995, 6:69-95.
46. Mathieson K. Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research 1991, 2:173-191.
47. McKnight D, Cummings L, Chervany N. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review 1998, 23:472-490.
48. Nataraajan R, Warshaw P. Are the models compatible for empirical comparison? An illustration with an intentions model, an expectations model, and traditional conjoint analysis. Advances in Consumer Research 1991, 19:472-482.
49. Nowak G, Phelps J. Direct marketing and the use of individual-level consumer information: Determining how and when privacy matters. Journal of Direct Marketing 1997, 11(4):94-109.
50. Nunnally J. Psychometric theory 1978, New York, McGraw-Hill
51. Pavlou P. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 2003, 7(3):69-103.
52. Plouffe C, Hulland J, Vandenbosch M. Richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions: Understanding merchant adoption of a smart-cart-based payment system. Information Systems Research 2001, 12:208-222.
53. Ratnasingham P. The importance of trust in electronic commerce. Internet Research 1998, 8:313-321.
54. Riemenschneider C, Hardgrave B. Explaining software development tool use with technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer Information Systems 2000, 41(4):1-8.
55. Schenk D, Vitalari P, Davis S. Differences between novice and expert system analysts: What do we know and what do we do? Journal of Management IS 1998, 15:9-50.
56. Sheehan K, Hoy M. Flaming, complaining, abstaining: How online users respond to privacy concerns. Journal of Advertising 1999, 28:37-51.
57. Smith J, Milberg J, Burke J. Information privacy: Measuring individuals' concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quarterly 1996, 20:167-196.
58. Stewart K, Segars A. An empirical examination of the Concern for Information Privacy instrument. Information Systems Research 2002, 13:36-49.
59. Straub D, Limayem M, Karahanna E. Measuring system usage: Implications for IS theory testing. Management Science 1995, 41:1328-1342.
60. Swanson E B. Measuring user attitude in MIS Research: A review. Omega International Journal of Management Science 1982, 10:157-165.
61. Szajna B. Software evaluation and choice: Predictive validation of the technology acceptance instrument. MIS Quarterly 1994, 18:319-324.
62. Szajna B. Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science 1996, 42:85-92.
63. Taylor S, Todd P. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research 1995, 6:144-176.
64. Yousafzai S, Pallister J, Foxall G. Strategies for building and communicating trust in electronic banking: A field experiment. Psychology and Marketing 2005, 22:181-201.
65. Yousafzai S, Foxall G R, Pallister J. Technology acceptance: A meta-analysis of the TAM. Journal of Modelling in Management 2007a, 2:251-280. Part 1
66. Yousafzai S, Foxall G R, Pallister J. Technology acceptance: A meta-analysis of the TAM. Journal of Modelling in Management 2007b, 2:281-304. Part 2