Explaining software development tool use with the technology acceptance model

Journal of Computer Information Systems

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 1-5

  Riemenschneider, Cynthia K ^a   Hardgrave, Bill C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; EASE-OF-USE; EXOGENOUS VARIABLES; SOFTWARE DEVELOPER; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT TOOLS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; HARDWARE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 0347140530     PISSN: 08874417     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adams, D.A., R.R. Nelson, and P.A. Todd. "Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication," MIS Quarterly, 16:2, June 1992, pp. 227-247.
2. Agarwal, R. and J. Prasad. "The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies," Decision Sciences, 28:3, Summer 1997, pp. 557-582.
3. Ajzen, I. Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Chicago: Dorsey, 1988.
4. Amoroso, D.L. and P.H. Cheney. "Testing a Causal Model of End-User Application Effectiveness," Journal of Management Information Systems, 8:1, 1991, pp. 63-89.
5. Anderson, J. and D. Gerbing. "Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach," Psychological Bulletin, 103, 1988, pp. 411-423.
6. Carmines, E. and J. McIver. "Analyzing Models with Unobserved Variables: Analysis of Covariance Structures." In Bohrnstedt, G.W. and E.F. Borgatta (Eds.). Social Measurement: Current Issues. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1981.
7. Chau, P.Y.K. "An Empirical Investigation on Factors Affecting the Acceptance of CASE by Systems Developers," Information and Management, 30, 1996, pp. 269-280.
8. Chin, W.W. and A. Gopal. "Adoption Intention in GSS: Relative Importance of Beliefs," DATA BASE Advances in Information Systems, 26:2 & 3: May/August 1995, pp. 42-64.
9. Corbitt, G. and R. Norman. "CASE Implementation: Accounting for the Human Elements," Information and Software Technology, 33:9, 1991, pp. 637-640.
10. Davis, F.D. "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, 13:3, September 1989, pp. 319-340.
11. Davis, F., R. Bagozzi, and P. Warshaw. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, 35:8, August 1989, pp. 982-1003.
12. Dietrich, G.B., D.B. Walz, and J.L. Wynekoop. "The Failure of SDT Diffusion: A Case for Mass Customization," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44:4, November 1997, pp. 390-398.
13. Fichman, R.G. and C.F. Kemerer. "The Assimilation of Software Process Innovations: An Organizational Learning Perspective," Management Science, 43:10, October 1997, pp. 1345-1363.
14. Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen. Belief, Attitude, Intention ,and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Readings, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
15. Fornell, C. and D. Larcker. "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error," Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 1981, pp. 39-50.
16. Glass, R.L. "Results of the First IS State-of-the-Practice Survey," Software Practitioner, 6:3-4, May-August 1996, pp. 1, 3-4, 6-7.
17. Hardgrave, B.C. "When to Prototype: Decision Variables Used in Industry," Information and Software Technology, 37:2, February 1995, pp. 113-118
18. Henderson, J.C. and J.G. Cooprider. "Dimensions of I/S Planning and Design Aids: A Functional Model of CASE Technology," Information Systems Research, 1:3, 1990, pp. 227-254.
19. Hollenbeck, J. and H. Klein. "Goal Commitment and the Goal-setting Process: Problems, Prospects, and Proposals for Future Research," Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 1987, pp. 204-211.
20. Igbaria, M., N. Zinatelli, P. Cragg, and A.I.M. Cavaye. "Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model," MIS Quarterly, 21:3, September 1997, pp. 279-305.
21. Iivari, J. "Why are CASE Tools Not Used?" Communications of the ACM,
22. nd ed. Chicago: SPSS, 1989.
23. Keil, M., P.M. Beranek, and B.R. Konsynski. "Usefulness and Ease of Use: Field Study Evidence Regarding Task Considerations," Decision Support Systems, 13:1, 1995, pp. 75-91.
24. Kemerer, C.F. "How the Learning Curve Affects CASE Tool Adoption," IEEE Software, 9:3, 1992, pp. 23-28.
25. Leonard-Barton, D. "Implementing Structured Software Methodologies: A Case of Innovation in Process Technology," Interfaces, 17:3, May-June 1987, pp. 6-17.
26. Moore, G.C. and I. Benbasat. "Developing of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, 2:3, September 1991, pp. 192-222.
27. Necco, C.R., C.L. Gordon, and N.W. Tsai. "Systems Analysis and Design: Current Practices," MIS Quarterly, 11:4, December 1987, pp. 461-475.
28. Orlikowski, W.J. "CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development," MIS Quarterly, 17:3, September 1993, pp. 309-340.
29. nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993.
30. Premkumar, G. and M. Potter. "Adoption of Computer Aided Software Engineering CASE Technology. An Innovation Adoption Perspective," DATA BASE Advances in Information Systems, 2 & 3, May/August 1995, pp. 105-123.
31. Rai, A. and R. Patnayakuni. "A Structural Model for CASE Adoption Behavior," Journal of Management Information Systems, 13:2, Fall 1996, pp. 205-234.
32. Roberts, T.L., M.L. Gibson, and K.T. Fields. "System Development Methodology Implementation: Perceived Aspects of Importance," Information Resources Management Journal, 12:3, July-September 1999, pp. 27-38.
33. Roberts, T.L., M.L. Gibson, K.T. Fields, and R.K. Rainer. "Factors that Impact Implementing a System Development Methodology," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 24:8, August 1998, pp. 640-649.
34. th ed. New York: Free, 1995.
35. Sharma, S. and A. Rai. "CASE Deployment in IS Organizations," Communications of the ACM, 43:1, January 2000, pp. 80-88.
36. Taylor, S. and P.A. Todd. "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research, 6:2, June 1995, pp. 144-176.
37. Thompson, R., C. Higgins, and J. Howell. "Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization," MIS Quarterly, 15:1, March 1991, pp. 125-143.
38. Venkatesh, V. and F.D. Davis. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, 46:2, February 2000, pp. 186-204.
39. Whitling, R. "Developing in Disarray," Software Magazine, September 1998, p. 20.
40. Zmud, R.W. "Diffusion of Modern Software Practices: Influence of Centralization and Formalization," Management Science, 28:12, December 1982, pp. 1421-1431.
41. Zmud, R.W. "The Effectiveness of External Information Channels in Facilitating Innovation Within Software Development Groups," MIS Quarterly, 7:2, June 1983, pp. 43-58.