Some factors that affect the comparison between isotropic and orthotropic inhomogeneous finite element material models of femur

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 553-560

  Yang, Haisheng ^a,b   Ma, Xin ^a,b   Guo, Tongtong ^a  

^a HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b SHENZHEN INSTITUTES OF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Femur; Finite element analysis; Isotropic; Material property; Orthotropic

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS RESULTS; COMPARISON RESULT; FEMORAL NECKS; FINITE ELEMENT; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; INHOMOGENEOUS MATERIALS; ISOTROPIC AND ORTHOTROPIC MATERIAL; ISOTROPIC MATERIALS; LOADING CONDITION; LOCAL REGION; MATERIAL MODELS; MESH REFINEMENT; NODAL DISPLACEMENT; REGIONS OF INTEREST; TWO-MATERIALS; VON MISES STRESS;

LOADING; MATERIALS PROPERTIES;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR; FEMUR NECK; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; ISOTROPIC MATERIAL MODEL; LOADING TEST; MECHANICAL STRESS; MODEL; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NODAL DISPLACEMENT; ORTHOTROPIC MATERIAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VON MISES STRESS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; PHYSIOLOGY;

BIOMECHANICS; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA;

EID: 77954033185     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Herrera A., Panisello J.J., Ibarz E., Cegoñio J., Puértolas J.A., Gracia L. Long-term study of bone remodeling after femoral stem: a comparison between dexa and finite element simulation. J Biomech 2007, 40:3615-3625.
2. Viceconti M., Bellingeri L., Cristofolini L., Toni A. A comparative study on different methods of automatic mesh generation of human femurs. Med Eng Phys 1998, 20:1-10.
3. Keyak J.H., Meagher J.M., Skinner H.B., Mote C.D. Automated three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone: a new method. J Biomed Eng 1990, 12:389-397.
4. Carter D.R., Hayes W.C. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977, 59:954-962.
5. Ashman R.B., Rho J.Y. Elastic modulus of trabecular bone material. J Biomech 1988, 21:177-181.
6. Rho J.Y., Hobatho M.C., Ashman R.B. Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone. Med Eng Phys 1995, 17:347-355.
7. Wirtz D.C., Schiffers N., Pandorf T., Radermacher K., Weichert D., Forst R. Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur. J Biomech 2000, 33:1325-1330.
8. Morgan E.F., Bayraktar H.H., Keaveny T.M. Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. J Biomech 2003, 36:897-904.
9. Helgason B., Perilli E., Schileo E., Taddei F., Brynjólfsson S., Viceconti M. Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a literature review. Clin Biomech 2008, 23:135-146.
10. Marom S.A., Linden M.J. Computer aided stress analysis of long bones utilizing computed tomography. J Biomech 1990, 23:399-404.
11. Zannoni C., Mantovani R., Viceconti M. Material properties assignment to finite element models of bone structures: a new method. Med Eng Phys 1998, 20:735-740.
12. Taddei F., Pancanti A., Viceconti M. An improved method for the automatic mapping of ct numbers onto finite element models. Med Eng Phys 2004, 26:61-69.
13. Taddei F., Schileo E., Helgason B., Cristofolini L., Viceconti M. The material mapping strategy influences the accuracy of CT-based finite element models of bones: an evaluation against experimental measurements. Med Eng Phys 2007, 29:973-979.
14. Helgason B., Taddei F., Pálsson H., Schileo E., Cristofolini L., Viceconti M., et al. A modified method for assigning material properties to FE models of bones. Med Eng Phys 2008, 30:444-453.
15. Ashman R.B., Cowin S.C., Van Buskirk W.C., Rice J.C. A continuous wave technique for the measurement of the elastic properties of cortical bone. J Biomech 1984, 17:349-361.
16. Taylor W.R., Roland E., Ploeg H., Hertig D., Klabunde R., Warner M.D., et al. Determination of orthotropic bone elastic constants using FEA and modal analysis. J Biomech 2002, 35:767-773.
17. Wirtz D.C., Pandorf T., Portheime F., Radermacher K., Schiffers N., Prescher A., et al. Concept and development of an orthotropic FE model of the proximal femur. J Biomech 2003, 36:289-293.
18. Baca V., Horak Z., Mikulenka P., Dzupa V. Comparison of an inhomogeneous orthotropic and isotropic material models used for FE analyses. Med Eng Phys 2008, 30:924-930.
19. Peng L., Bai J., Zeng X., Zhou Y. Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions. Med Eng Phys 2006, 28:227-233.
20. Baca V., Horak Z. Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions. Med Eng Phys 2007, 29:935.
21. Kalender W.A. A phantom for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by qct and dxa: design considerations and specifications. Med Phys 1992, 19:583-586.
22. Miller Z., Fuchs M.B., Arcan M. Trabecular bone adaptation with an orthotropic material model. J Biomech 2002, 35:247-256.
23. Schileo E., Taddei F., Malandrino A., Cristofolini L., Viceconti M. Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. J Biomech 2007, 40:2982-2989.
24. Bergmann G., Deuretzbacher G., Heller M., Graichen F., Rohlmann A., Strauss J., et al. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 2001, 34:859-871.
25. Siwach R.C., Dahiya S. Anthropometric study of proximal femur geometry and its clinical application. Indian J Orthop 2003, 37:247-251.
26. Leung K., Procter P., Robioneck B., Behrens K. Geometric mismatch of the gamma nail to the Chinese femur. Clin Orthop 1996, 323:42-48.
27. Payan Y., Luboz V., Chabanas M., Swider P., Marecaux C., Boutault F. Biomechanics Applied to Computer Assisted Surgery 2005, Research Signpost, Trivandrum, p. 299-310.
28. Austman R.L., Milner J.S., Holdsworth D.W., Dunning C.E. The effect of the density-modulus relationship selected to apply material properties in a finite element model of long bone. J Biomech 2008, 41:3171-3176.
29. Schneider R., Faust G., Hindenlang U., Helwig P. Inhomogeneous, orthotropic material model for the cortical structure of long bones modelled on the basis of clinical CT or density data. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2009, 198:2167-2174.
30. Pahr D.H., Zysset P.K. A comparison of enhanced continuum FE with micro FE models of human vertebral bodies. J Biomech 2009, 42:455-462.