The effect of the density-modulus relationship selected to apply material properties in a finite element model of long bone

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 41, Issue 15, 2008, Pages 3171-3176

  Austman, Rebecca L ^a   Milner, Jaques S ^b   Holdsworth, David W ^a,b   Dunning, Cynthia E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b ROBARTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Density modulus relationships for bone; Distal ulna; Elastic modulus of bone; Finite element modeling; Model validation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE STRESS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LONG BONE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ULNA; YOUNG MODULUS;

AGED; BONE DENSITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTIC MODULUS; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; STRESS, MECHANICAL; ULNA;

EID: 55549143621     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.08.017     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. An Y.H., Barfield W.R., and Knets I. Methods of evaluation for bone dimensions, densities, contents, morphology, and structures. In: An Y.H., and Draughn R.A. (Eds). Mechanical Testing of Bone and the Bone-Implant Interface (2000), CRC Press, Boca Raton 109-110
2. Austman R.L., Beaton B.J., Quenneville C.E., King G.J., Gordon K.D., and Dunning C.E. The effect of distal ulnar implant stem material and length on bone strains. Journal of Hand Surgery American 32 (2007) 848-854
3. Baca V., Horak Z., Mikulenka P., and Dzupa V. Comparison of an inhomogeneous orthotropic material models used for FE analyses. Medical Engineering & Physics 30 (2008) 924-930
4. Barker D.S., Netherway D.J., Krishnan J., and Hearn T.C. Validation of a finite element model of the human metacarpal. Medical Engineering & Physics 27 (2005) 103-113
5. Carter D.R., and Hayes W.C. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 59 (1977) 954-962
6. Finlay J.B., Bourne R.B., and McLean J. A technique for the in vitro measurement of principal strains in the human tibia. Journal of Biomechanics 15 (1982) 723-729
7. Gordon K.D., Kedgley A.E., Ferreira L.M., King G.J., and Johnson J.A. Design and implementation of an instrumented ulnar head prosthesis to measure loads in vitro. Journal of Biomechanics 39 (2006) 1335-1341
8. Helgason B., Perilli E., Schileo E., Taddei F., Brynjolfsson S., and Viceconti M. Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a literature review. Clinical Biomechanics 23 (2008) 135-146
9. Keller T.S. Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone. Journal of Biomechanics 27 (1994) 1159-1168
10. Keyak J.H., Lee I.Y., and Skinner H.B. Correlations between orthogonal mechanical properties and density of trabecular bone: use of different densitometric measures. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 28 (1994) 1329-1336
11. Lotz J.C., Gerhart T.N., and Hayes W.C. Mechanical properties of trabecular bone from the proximal femur: a quantitative CT study. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 14 (1990) 107-114
12. Lotz J.C., Gerhart T.N., and Hayes W.C. Mechanical properties of metaphyseal bone in the proximal femur. Journal of Biomechanics 24 (1991) 317-329
13. Morgan E.F., Bayraktar H.H., and Keaveny T.M. Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. Journal of Biomechanics 36 (2003) 897-904
14. Peng L., Bai J., Zeng X., and Zhou Y. Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignment on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions. Medical Engineering & Physics 28 (2006) 227-233
15. Ramos A., and Simoes J.A. Tetrahedral versus hexahedral finite elements in numerical modelling of the proximal femur. Medical Engineering & Physics 28 (2006) 916-924
16. Schileo E., Taddei F., Malandrino A., Cristofolini L., and Viceconti M. Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. Journal of Biomechanics 40 (2007) 2982-2989
17. Snyder S.M., and Schneider E. Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 9 (1991) 422-431
18. Taddei F., Schileo E., Helgason B., Cristofolini L., and Viceconti M. The material mapping strategy influences the accuracy of CT-based finite element models of bones: an evaluation against experimental measurements. Medical Engineering & Physics 29 (2007) 973-979
19. Weinans H., Sumner D.R., Igloria R., and Natarajan R.N. Sensitivity of periprosthetic stress-shielding to load and the bone density-modulus relationship in subject-specific finite element models. Journal of Biomechanics 33 (2000) 809-817
20. Wirtz D.C., Schiffers N., Pandorf T., Radermacher K., Weichert D., and Forst R. Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur. Journal of Biomechanics 33 (2000) 1325-1330
21. Wright T.M., and Hayes W.C. Strain gauge application on compact bone. Journal of Biomechanics 12 (1979) 471-475