Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 33, Issue 10, 2000, Pages 1325-1330

  Wirtz, Dieter Christian ^a   Schiffers, Norbert ^a   Forst, Raimund ^a   Pandorf, Thomas ^a   Weichert, Dieter ^a   Radermacher, Klaus ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bone density; Bone material properties; Finite element model; Orthotropy; Proximal femur

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; ELASTIC MODULI; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; TENSILE PROPERTIES; TORSIONAL STRESS;

ORTHOTROPY; PROXIMAL FEMUR;

BONE;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE STRENGTH; CANCELLOUS BONE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TENSILE STRENGTH; VISCOELASTICITY;

ANISOTROPY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; ELASTICITY; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH; TORSION; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0034308380     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00069-5     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Andriacchi T.P., Galante J.O., Belytschko T.B., Hampton S. A stress analysis of the femoral stem in total hip prosthesis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 58-A:1976;618-624.
2. Ashman R.B., Cowin S.C., Van Buskirk W.C., Rice J.C. A continuous wave technique for the measurement of the elastic properties of cortical bone. Journal of Biomechanics. 17:1984;349-361.
3. Ashman R.B., Rho J.Y. Elastic modulus of trabecular bone material. Journal of Biomechanics. 21:1988;177-181.
4. Bargren J.H., Andrew C., Bassett L., Gjelsvik A. Mechanical properties of hydrated cortical bone. Journal of Biomechanics. 7:1974;239-245.
5. Beaupré G.S., Orr T.E., Carter D.R. An approach for time-dependent bone modeling and remodeling - theoretical development. Journal of Orthpaedic Research. 8:1990;651-661.
6. Besdo D., Handel M. Numerical treatment of bone as anisotropic material. Biomedical Technology. 39:1994;293-298.
7. Burstein A.H., Reilly D.T., Martens M. Aging of bone tissue. mechanical properties Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 58-A:1976;82-86.
8. Carter D.R., Hayes W.C. Bone compressive strengh. the influence of density and strain rate Science. 194:1976;1174-1175.
9. Carter D.R., Schwab G.H., Spengler D.M. Tensile fracture of cancellous bone. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 51:1980;733-741.
10. Dempster W.T., Liddicoat R.T. Compact bone as a non-isotropic material. American Journal of Anatomy. 91:1952;331-362.
11. Goulet R.W., Goldstein S.A., Ciarelli M.J., Kuhn J.L., Brown M.B., Feldkamp L.A. The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. Journal of Biomechanics. 27:1994;375-389.
12. Hirsch C., da Silva O. The effect of orientation on some mechanical properties of femoral cortical bone specimens. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 38:1967;45-56.
13. Huiskes R., Weinans H., Dalstra M. Adaptive bone remodeling and biomechanical design considerations. Orthopedics. 12:1989;1255-1267.
14. Jacobs C.R., Simo J.C., Beaupré G.S., Carter D.S. Adaptive bone remodeling incorporating simultaneous density and anisotropy considerations. Journal of Biomechanics. 30:1997;603-613.
15. Katz J.L., Meunier A. The elastic anisotropy of bone. Journal of Biomechanics. 20:1987;1063-1070.
16. Knauß P. Material properties and strength behaviour of spongy bone tissue at the coxal human femur. Biomedical Technology. 26:1981;200-210.
17. Knauß P. Material properties and strength behaviour of the compact bone tissue at the coxal human femur. Biomedical Technology. 26:1981;311-315.
18. Knese K.H., Hahne O.H., Biermann H. Festigkeitsuntersuchungen am menschlichen Extremitätenknochen. Gegenbaurs Morphologisones Jahrbuch. 96:1956;141-209.
19. Lindahl O., Lindgren A. Cortical bone in man, I. Variation of the amount and density with age and sex. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 38:1967;133-140.
20. Lindahl O., Lindgren A.G. Cortical bone in man, II. Variation in tensile strengh with age and sex. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 38:1967;141-147.
21. Linde F., Sorensen H.C. The effect of different storage methods on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. Journal of Biomechanics. 26:1993;1249-1252.
22. Lotz J.C., Gerhart T.N., Hayes W.C. Mechanical properties of trabecular bone from the proximal femur. a quantitative CT study Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 14:1990;107-114.
23. Lotz J.C., Gerhart T.N., Hayes W.C. Mechanical properties of metaphyseal bone in the proximal femur. Journal of Biomechanics. 24:1991;317-329.
24. Martens M., vanAudekercke R., DeMeester P., Mulier J.C. The geometrical properties of human femur and tibia and their importance for the mechanical behaviour of these bone-structures. Archives of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery. 98:1981;113-120.
25. Martens R., Van Audekercke R., Delport P., DeMeester P., Mulier J.C. The mechanical characteristics of cancellous bone at the upper femoral region. Journal of Biomechanics. 16:1983;971-983.
26. Rauber A. Elastizität und Festigkeit der Knochen. 1896;Engelmann Press, Leipzig.
27. Reilly D.T., Burstein A.H. The mechanical properties of cortical bone. Journal Bone and Joint Surgery. 56-A:1974;1001-1022.
28. Reilly D.T., Burstein A.H., Frankel V.H. The elastic modulus for bone. Journal of Biomechanics. 7:1974;271-275.
29. Reilly D.T., Burstein A.H. The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. Journal of Biomechanics. 8:1975;393-405.
30. Rohlmann A., Bergmann R., Kölbel R. Finite element analysis, its limitations and the relevance of its results to orthopedic surgery as shown by simultaneous experimental measurements. Zeischrift fuer Orthopadie. 118:1980;122-131.
31. Rohlmann A., Mössner U., Bergmann G., Kölbel R. Finite-element-analysis and experimental investigation of stress in a femur. Journal of Biomedical Engineering. 4:1982;241-246.
32. Rohlmann A., Mössner U., Bergmann G. Finite-element-analysis and experimental investigation in a femur with hip endoprosthesis. Journal of Biomechanics. 16:1983;727-742.
33. Saito S. Distribution of density, pressure and tensile strength of the human femoral shaft. Anatomischer Anzeiger. 154:1983;365-376.
34. Schmitt H.P. On the relationship between density and strength of bone; examination of human femora. Zeistschrift fuer Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte. 127:1968;1-24.
35. Sedlin E.D., Hirsch H. Factors affecting the determination of the physical properties of femoral cortical bone. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 37:1966;29-48.
36. Simkin A., Makin M., Menczel J., Gordon R., Naor E. The mechanical properties and the porosity of femoral cortical bone in patients with fractured neck of femur. Israel Journal of Medical Science. 7:1971;448-451.
37. Smith J.W., Walmsley R. Factors affecting the elasticity of bone. Journal of Anatomy. 93:1959;503-523.
38. Svensson N.L., Valliappan S., Wood R.D. Stress analysis of human femur with implanted Charnley prosthesis. Journal of Biomechanics. 10:1977;581-588.
39. Viano D., Helfenstein U., Anliker M., Rüegsegger P. Elastic properties of cortical bone in female human femurs. Journal of Biomechanics. 9:1976;703-710.
40. Vinz H. Firmness of pure bone substance. Approximation method for the determination of bone tissue firmness related to the cavity-free cross section. Gegenbaurs Morphologisilia Jarbuch. 117:1972;453-460.
41. Wall J.C., Chatterji S., Jeffery J.W. Human femoral cortical bone. a preliminary report on the relationship between strengh and density Medicial and Biological Engineering. 10:1972;673-676.