Comparison of an inhomogeneous orthotropic and isotropic material models used for FE analyses

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 924-930

  Baca, Vaclav ^a   Horak, Zdenek ^b   Mikulenka, Petr ^b   Dzupa, Valer ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b CZECH TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Cortical and cancellous bone; Finite element; Material properties; Proximal femur

Indexed keywords

BONE; ERROR ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

BONE DENSITIES; CADAVERIC FEMUR; CANCELLOUS BONES; CLINICAL APPLICATIONS; CORTICAL AND CANCELLOUS BONE; CT SCANNING; FE SIMULATIONS; FINITE ELEMENT; INHOMOGENEOUS MATERIALS; ISOTROPIC MATERIALS; MAIN FACTORS; MATERIAL PROPERTIES; ORTHOTROPY; PROXIMAL FEMUR; THREE DIMENSIONAL GEOMETRIES;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CADAVER; CANCELLOUS BONE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORTICAL BONE; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GEOMETRY; HYPOTHESIS; ISOTROPIC MATERIAL MODEL; MODEL; ORTHOTROPIC MATERIAL MODEL; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION;

ALGORITHMS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; CADAVER; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 50249121160     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ramos A., and Simoes J.A. Tetrahedral versus hexahedral finite elements in numerical modelling of the proximal femur. Med Eng Phys 28 (2006) 916-924
2. Kowalczyk P. Elastic properties of cancellous bone derived from finite element models of parameterized microstructure cells. J Biomech 36 (2003) 961-972
3. Keyak J.H., and Falkinstein Y. Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scans-based finite element model prediction of proximal femoral fracture load. Med Eng Phys 25 (2003) 781-787
4. Taylor W.R., Roland E., Ploeg H., Hertig D., Klabunde R., Warner M.D., et al. Determination of orthotropic bone elastic constants using FEA and modal analysis. J Biomech 35 (2002) 767-773
5. Peng L., Bai J., Zeng X., and Zhou Y. Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions. Med Eng Phys 28 (2006) 227-233
6. Rho J.Y., Hobatho M.C., and Ashman R.B. Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone. Med Eng Phys 17 (1995) 347-355
7. Wirtz D.C.H., Pandorf T., Portheime F., Radermache K., Schiffers N., et al. Concept and development of an orthotropic FE model of the proximal femur. J Biomech 36 (2003) 289-293
8. Turner C.H.H., Rho J., Takano Y., Tsui T.Y., and Pharr G.M. The elastic properties of trabecular and cortical bone tissues are similar: results from two microscopic measurement techniques. J Biomech 32 (1999) 437-441
9. Homminga J., McCreadie B.R., Ciarelli T.E., Weinans H., Goldstein S.A., and Huikes R. Cancellous bone mechanical properties from normal and patient with hip fractures differ on the structure level not on the bone hard tissue level. Bone 30 (2002) 759-764
10. Kohles S.S. Applications of an anisotropic parameter to cortical bone. J Mat Sci 11 (2000) 261-265
11. Benninghof A. Spaltlinien am Knochen, eine Methode zur Ermittlung der Architektur platter Knochen. Ver Anat Ges 34 (1925) 189-206
12. Sinelnikov N.A. Spatial architecture of osteons in the diaphysis of the femur in man and other primates. Antrop Zurnal 3 (1937) 102-115
13. Cohen J., and Harris W.H. The three-dimensional anatomy of haversian systems. J Bone J Surg 40A (1958) 419-434
14. Hert J., Fiala P., and Petrtyl M. Osteon orientation of the diaphysis of the long bone in man. Bone 15 (1994) 269-277
15. Hert J., Fiala P., and Petrtyl M. Structure and loading mode of long bones in man. Acta Chir OrthopTraumat Cechoslovaca 60 (1993) 199-208
16. Wirtz D.C., Schiffers N., Pandorf T., Radermache K., Weichert D., and Forst R. Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur. J Biomech 33 (2000) 1325-1330
17. Ramos A., and Simões J.A. Tetrahedral versus hexahedral finite elements in numerical modelling of the proximal femur. Med Eng Phys 28 (2006) 916-924
18. Turmer C.H., Cowin S.C., Rho J.Y., Ashman R.B., and Rice J.C. The fabric dependence of the orthotropic elastic constants of cancellous bone. J Biomech 23 (1990) 549-561
19. Baca V., Kachlik D., Horak Z., and Stingl J. The course of osteons in the compact bone of the human proximal femur-morphological study with clinical and biomechanical notes. Surg Radiol Anat 29 (2007) 201-207
20. Nedoma J., Stehlík J., Bartos M., Denk F., Dzupa V., Fousek J., et al. Biomechanika lidskeho skeletu a umelych nahrad jeho casti (Biomechanics of the human skeletal system and its prostheses) (2006), Karolinum, Prague