Methods for evaluating suitability of econometric demand models in design for market systems

Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference 2009, DETC2009

Volumn 5, Issue PART A, 2010, Pages 397-406

  Frischknecht, Bart ^a   Whitetoot, Katie ^a   Papalambros, Panos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTRIBUTE SUBSTITUTION; AUTOMOTIVE MARKETS; CONSUMER DEMANDS; DEMAND MODELS; DIFFERENTIATED PRODUCTS; ECONOMETRIC MODEL; EVALUATION METHOD; FUNCTIONAL FORMS; MARKET SYSTEM; MODEL FIT; VERTICAL DIFFERENTIATION;

COMMERCE; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 77953708762     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/DETC2009-87165     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Tirole, J., 1988. The Theory of Industrial Organization. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Georgiopoulos, P., Jonsson, M., and Papalambros, P. Y., 2005. "Linking optimal design decisions to the theory of the firm: The case of resource allocation". Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME, 127(3), pp. 358-366.
3. Kumar, D., Hoyle, C., Chen, W., Wang, N., Gomez-Levi, G., and Koppelman, F. S., 2007. "Incorporating customer preferences and market trends in vehicle package design". In Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, no. DETC2007-35520.
4. Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait, J. D., and Adamowicz, W., 2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
5. Feit, E., Feinberg, F., and Baltramo, M., In Review. "Reality check: Combining survey and market data to estimate choice models". Management Science.
6. Train, K., and Winston, C., 2007. "Vehicle choice behavior and the declining market share of u.s. automakers". International Economic Review, 48(4), pp. 1469-1496.
7. Beresteanu, A., and Li, S., 2008. "Gasoline prices, government support, and the demand for hybrid vehicles in the us". [Working paper].
8. Petrin, A., 2002. "Quantifying the benefits of new products: The case of the minivan". Journal of Political Economy, 110(4), pp. 705-729.
9. Brownstone, D., Bunch, D. S., and Train, K., 2000. "Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles". Transportation Research Part B, 34(5), pp. 315-338.
10. Goldberg, P. K., 1995. "Product differentiation and oligopoly in international markets: the case of the u.s. automobile industry". Econometrica, 63(4), pp. 891-951.
11. Sudhir, K., 2001. "Competitive pricing behavior in the auto market: A structural analysis". Marketing Science, 20(1), pp. 42-60.
12. Berry, S., Levinsohn, J., and Pakes, A., 1995. "Automobile prices in market equilibrium". Econometrica, 63(4), Jul., pp. 841-890.
13. Nevo, A., 2000. "A practitioner's guide to estimation of random-coefficients logit models of demand". Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 9(4), pp. 513-548.
14. Michalek, J. J., Papalambros, P. Y., and Skerlos, S. J., 2004. "A study of fuel efficiency and emission policy impact on optimal vehicle design decisions". Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME, 126(6), pp. 1062-1070.
15. Shiau, C. S., and Michalek, J., 2008. "A game-theoretic approach to finding market equilibria for automotive design under environmental regulation". In Proceedings of the ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Vol. DETC2008-49143.
16. Frischknecht, B., and Papalambros, P. Y., 2008. "A pareto approach to aligning public and private objectives in vehicle design". In Proceedings of the ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, no. DETC2008-49143.
17. Wassenaar, H. J., Chen, W., Cheng, J., and Sudjianto, A., 2005. "Enhancing discrete choice demand modeling for decision-based design". Journal of Mechanical Design, 127, p. 514.
18. Donndelinger, J. A., Robinson, J., and Wissmann, L. A., 2008. "Choice model specification for market-based engineering design". In Proceedings of the ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, no. DETC2008-50071.
19. Shiau, C. S. N., and Michalek, J. J., 2009. "Should designers worry about market systems?". Journal of Mechanical Design, 131(1), p. 011011(9 p).
20. Chintagunta, P., Erdem, T., Rossi, P. E., and Wedel, M., 2006. "Structural modeling in marketing: Review and assessment". Marketing Science, 25(6), pp. 604-616.
21. Train, K., 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
22. Morrow, W. R., 2008. A Fixed-Point Approach to Equilibrium Pricing in Differentiated Product Markets. PhD Dissertation, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of.
23. Train, K., 2009. Kenneth Train's Home Page. University of California, Berkeley, elsa.berkeley.edu/train/software.html.
24. Maritz Holdings Inc., 2007. Maritz Research 2006 New Vehicle Customer Satisfactions Survey. www.maritz.com.
25. Chrome Systems Inc., 2008. Chrome New Vehicle Database. www.chrome.com.
26. Hauser, J. R., Toubia, O., Evgeniou, T., Silinskiai, D., and Befurt, R., In Review. "Disjunctions of conjunctions, cognitive simplicity and consideration sets". Journal of Marketing Research.
27. Michalek, J. J., Feinberg, F. M., and Papalambros, P. Y., 2005. "Linking marketing and engineering product design decisions via analytical target cascading". Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(1), pp. 42-62.
28. Hauser, J. R., and Wernerfelt, B., 1990. "An evaluation cost model of consideration sets". The Journal of Consumer Research, 16(4), Mar., pp. 393-408.
29. Horowitz, J., and Louviere, J., 1995. "What is the role of consideration sets in choice modeling?". International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12(1), pp. 39-54.
30. Heckman, J., 1979. "Sample selection bias as a specification error". Econometrica, 47, pp. 153-161.