Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 315-338

  Brownstone, David ^a   Bunch, David S ^b   Train, Kenneth ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILES; AUTOMOTIVE FUELS; GASOLINE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; METHANOL FUELS; NATURAL GAS;

ALTERNATIVE-FUEL VEHICLES;

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION;

ALTERNATIVE FUEL; CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; ENERGY USE; LOGIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 0034128513     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-2615(99)00031-4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ben-Akiva, M., Buldoc, D., 1996. Multinomial probit with a logit kernel and a general parametric specification of the covariance structure. Working paper, Department of Economics, MIT.
2. Ben-Akiva, M., Morikawa, T., 1997. Methods to estimate discrete choice models with stated and revealed preferences. Paper presented at 1997 NSF Symposium on Eliciting Preferences, Berkeley, California, July 1997.
3. Bhat, C., 1996a. Accommodating variations in responsiveness to level-of-service measures in travel model choice modeling. Working paper, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
4. Bhat, C., 1996b. Incorporating observed and unobserved heterogeneity in urban work travel mode choice modeling. Working paper, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
5. Brownstone, D., Bunch, D., Golob, T., Ren, W., 1996. Transactions choice model for forecasting demand for alternative-fuel vehicles. In: McMullen, S. (Ed.), Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 4, JAI Press, pp. 87-129.
6. Brownstone, D., Train, K., 1998. Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns. Journal of Econometrics (in press).
7. Bunch D.S. A comparison of algorithms for maximum likelihood estimation of choice models. Journal of Econometrics. 38:1988;145-167.
8. Bunch, D.S., Brownstone, D., Golob, T.F., 1996. A dynamic forecasting system for vehicle markets with clean-fuel vehicles. In: Hensher, D.A., King, J. (Eds.), World Transport Research, vol. 4, pp. 189-203.
9. Bunch D.S., Gay D.M., Welsch R.E. Algorithm 717: Subroutines for maximum likelihood and quasi-likelihood estimation of parameters in nonlinear regression models. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software. 19(1):1993;109-130.
10. Hensher D., Bradley M. Using stated response data to enrich revealed preference discrete choice models. Marketing Letters. 4(2):1993;139-152.
11. Lee L. On efficiency of methods of simulated moments and maximum simulated likelihood estimation of discrete response models. Econometrica. 8:1992;518-552.
12. McFadden D., Train K. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. 1997;Department of Economics, UC Berkeley.
13. Mehndiratta, S., 1996. Time-of-day effects in inter-city business travel. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.
14. Morikawa T. Correcting state dependence and serial correlation in RP/SP combined estimation method. Transportation. 21(2):1994;153-166.
15. Revelt, D., Train, K., 1998. Incentives for appliance efficiency in a competitive energy environment: random-parameters logit models of households' choices. Review of Economics and Statistics (in press).
16. Swait J., Louviere J.J. The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models. Journal of Marketing Research. 30:1993;305-314.
17. Train, K., 1995. Simulation methods for probit and related models based on convenient error partitioning. Working Paper No. 95-237, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley.
18. Train, K., 1998. Unobserved taste variation in recreation demand models. Land Economics (in press).