Pulp response to resin-modified glass ionomer and calcium hydroxide cements in deep cavities: A quantitative systematic review

Dental Materials

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 761-770

  Mickenautsch, Steffen ^a   Yengopal, Veerasamy ^a   Banerjee, Avijit ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Calcium hydroxide; Cavity lining; Indirect pulp capping; Meta analysis; Pulp histology; Resin modified glass ionomer cement; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; CALCIUM HYDROXIDES; CAVITY LINING; INDIRECT PULP CAPPING; META-ANALYSIS; RESIN-MODIFIED GLASS IONOMER; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

CALCIUM; CEMENTS; GLASS; HISTOLOGY; HYDRATED LIME; LONGITUDINAL CONTROL; RESINS;

QUALITY CONTROL;

CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; GLASS IONOMER;

ANIMAL; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DRUG EFFECT; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; ODONTOBLAST; REVIEW; RISK; TOOTH PULP;

ANIMALS; CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL PULP; DENTAL PULP CAPPING; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; ODDS RATIO; ODONTOBLASTS;

EID: 77953683051     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.03.021     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Hilton T.J. Keys to clinical success with pulp capping: a review of the literature. Oper Dent 34 (2009) 615-625
2. Weiner R.S. Liners, bases and cements: a solid foundation. Gen Dent 50 (2002) 442-446
3. Pinto A.S., de Araujo F.B., Franzon R., Figueiredo M.C., Henz S., Garcia-Godoy F., et al. Clinical and microbiological effect of calcium hydroxide protection in indirect pulp capping in primary teeth. Am J Dent 19 (2006) 382-386
4. Cox C.F., Hafez A.A., Akimoto N., Otsuki M., and Mills J.C. Biological basis for clinical success: pulp protection and the tooth-restoration interface. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 11 (1999) 819-826
5. Frencken J.E., Pilot T., Songpaisan Y., and Phantumvanit P. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): rationale, technique, and development. J Public Health Dent 56 (1996) 135-140
6. Wilson N.H. Conference report. Direct adhesive materials: current perceptions and evidence-future solutions. J Dent 29 (2001) 307-316
7. Nicholson J.W., and Czarnecka B. The biocompatibility of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements for dentistry. Dent Mater 24 (2008) 1702-1708
8. Geurtsen W. Biocompatibility of resin-modified filling materials. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 11 (2000) 333-335
9. Schmalz G. The biocompatibility of non-amalgam dental filling materials. Eur J Oral Sci 106 (1998) 696-706
10. Sidhu S.K., and Schmalz G. The biocompatibility of glass-ionomer cement materials. Am J Dent 14 (2001) 387-396
11. Goldberg M. In vitro and in vivo studies on the toxicity of dental resin components: a review. Clin Oral Invest 12 (2008) 1-8
12. Sutherland S.E. Evidence-based dentistry: Part V. Critical appraisal of the dental literature: papers about therapy. J Can Dent Assoc 67 (2001) 442-445
13. The Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.6 (2006), The Cochrane Collaboration pp. 79-89
14. Sutherland S.E. Evidence-based dentistry: Part IV. Research design and level of evidence. J Can Dent Assoc 67 (2001) 375-378
15. The Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.6 (2006), The Cochrane Collaboration pp. 136- 45
16. Thompson S.G. Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated. BMJ 309 (1994) 1351-1355
17. Higgins J.P.T., Thompson S.G., Deeks J.J., and Altman D.G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327 (2003) 557-560
18. Mousavinasab M., Namazikhah M.S., Sarabi N., Jajarm H.H., Bidar M., and Ghavamnasiri M. Histopathology study on pulp response to glass ionomers in human teeth. J Calif Dent Assoc 36 (2008) 51-55
19. Marchi J.J., de Araujo F.B., Fröner A.M., Straffon L.H., and Nör J.E. Indirect pulp capping in the primary dentition: a 4 year follow-up study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 31 (2006) 68-71
20. Murray P.E., and García-Godoy F. The incidence of pulp healing defects with direct capping materials. Am J Dent 19 (2006) 171-177
21. Costa C.A., Oliveira M.F., Giro E.M., and Hebling J. Biocompatibility of resin-based materials used as pulp-capping agents. Int Endod J 36 (2003) 831-839
22. Costa C.A., Giro E.M., do Nascimento A.B., Teixeira H.M., and Hebling J. Short-term evaluation of the pulpo-dentin complex response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and a bonding agent applied in deep cavities. Dent Mater 19 (2003) 739-746
23. Murray P.E., Hafez A.A., Windsor L.J., Smith A.J., and Cox C.F. Comparison of pulp responses following restoration of exposed and non-exposed cavities. J Dent 30 (2002) 213-222
24. Murray P.E., About I., Lumley P.J., Franquin J.C., Remusat M., and Smith A.J. Cavity remaining dentin thickness and pulpal activity. Am J Dent 15 (2002) 41-46
25. Murray P.E., About I., Franquin J.C., Remusat M., and Smith A.J. Restorative pulpal and repair responses. J Am Dent Assoc 132 (2001) 482-491
26. About I., Murray P.E., Franquin J.C., Remusat M., and Smith A.J. The effect of cavity restoration variables on odontoblast cell numbers and dental repair. J Dent 29 (2001) 109-117
27. Tarim B., Hafez A.A., and Cox C.F. Pulpal response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer material on nonexposed and exposed monkey pulps. Quintessence Int 29 (1998) 535-542
28. Murray P.E., Hafez A.A., Smith A.J., and Cox C.F. Bacterial microleakage and pulp inflammation associated with various restorative materials. Dent Mater 18 (2002) 470-478
29. The Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.6 (2006), The Cochrane Collaboration pp. 97-99
30. Chalmers T.C., Matta R.J., Smith Jr. H., and Kunzler A.M. Evidence favoring the use of anticoagulants in the hospital phase of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 297 (1977) 1091-1096
31. Egger M., Jüni P., Bartlett C., Holenstein F., and Sterne J. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. Health Technol Assess 7 (2003) 1-76
32. Kjaergard L.L., Villumsen J., and Gluud C. Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Ann Intern Med 135 (2001) 982-989
33. Moher D., Schulz K.F., and Altman D.G. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 357 (2001) 1191-1194