Restorative pulpal and repair responses

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 132, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 482-491

  Murray, Peter E ^a   About, Imad ^b   Franquin, Jean Claude ^b   Remusat, Mireille ^b   Smith, Anthony J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; COLORING AGENT; DENTAL ALLOY; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GLASS IONOMER; POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CELL SURVIVAL; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; DRUG EFFECT; ENAMEL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MICROBIOLOGY; ODONTOBLAST; PATHOLOGY; PULPITIS; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH PULP; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; CELL SURVIVAL; CHILD; COLORING AGENTS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PULP; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; ODONTOBLASTS; POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT; PULPITIS; RESIN CEMENTS; ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL CEMENT;

EID: 0035319464     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0211     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Arnst C, Carey J. Biotech bodies. Businessweek July 1998:42-9.
2. Baume LJ, Fiore-Donno G. Response of the human pulp to a new restorative material. JADA 1968;76:1016-22.
3. Suarez CL, Stanley HR, Gilmore HW. Histopathologic response of the human dental pulp to restorative resins. JADA 1970;80:793-800.
4. Brannstrom M, Nyborg H. Pulpal reaction to composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:181-9.
5. Goto G, Jordan RE. Pulpal response to composite-resin materials. J Prosthet Dent 1972;28:601-6.
6. Dalleske RL, Stanley HR, Heyde JB. Human pulp response to a new composite system: Vytol composite restorative and bonding agent. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1978;46:418-26.
7. Qvist V, Thylstrup A, Mjör IA. Restorative treatment pattern and longevity of resin restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1986;44:351-6.
8. Mjör IA, Jokstad A, Qvist V. Longevity of posterior restorations. Int Dent J 1990;40:11-7.
9. Maupome G, Sheiham A. Criteria for restoration replacement and restoration life-span estimates in an educational environment. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:896-901.
10. Burke FJ, Cheung SW, Mjör IA, Wilson NH. Reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations in vocational training practices. Prim Dent Care 1999;6:17-20.
11. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, Syed SA. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982;11:439-50.
12. Cox CF. Microleakage related to restorative procedures. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992;88(suppl 1):83-93.
13. Bergenholtz G. Pathogenic mechanisms in pulpal disease. J Endod 1990;16:98-101.
14. Suh BI, Cincione FA. All-Bond 2: the fourth generation bonding system. Esthet Dent Update 1992;5:61-6.
15. Kitasako Y, Inokoshi S, Tagami J. Effects of direct pulp capping techniques on short-term response of the mechanically exposed pulp beneath adhesive resin systems. J Dent 1999;27:257-63.
16. Vann WF Jr., Barkmeier WW, Mahler DB. Assessing composite resin wear in primary molars: four-year findings. J Dent Res 1988;67:876-9.
17. Tonn EM, Ryge G. Clinical evaluations of composite resin restorations in primary molars: a 4-year follow-up study. JADA 1988;117:603-6.
18. Berry TG, Summitt JB, Chung AK, Osborne JW. Amalgam at the new millennium. JADA 1998;129:1547-56.
19. Duke ES. Adhesion and its application with restorative materials. Dent Clin North Am 1993;37:329-40.
20. Shavell HM. The amalgapin technique for complex amalgam restorations. J Calif Dent Assoc 1980;8:48-55.
21. Tsunekawa M, Usami Y, Iwaku M, Setcos JC, Marshall SJ. A new light-activated adhesive cavity liner: an in vitro bond strength and microleakage study. Dent Mater 1992;8:296-8.
22. Donly KJ, Grandgenett C. Dentin demineralization inhibition at restoration margins of Vitremer, Dyract and Compoglass. Am J Dent 1998;11:245-8.
23. Donly KJ, Segura A, Kanellis M, Erickson RL. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. JADA 1999;130:1459-66.
24. Cox CF. Re-evaluating pulp protection: calcium hydroxide liners vs. cohesive hybridization. JADA 1994;125:823-31.
25. Cox CF, Bergenholtz G, Heys DR, Syed SA, Fitzgerald M, Heys RJ. Pulp capping of dental pulp mechanically exposed to oral microflora: a 1-2 year observation of wound healing in the monkey. J Oral Pathol 1985;14:156-68.
26. Saxe SR, Wekstein MW, Kryscio RJ, et al. Alzheimer's disease, dental amalgam and mercury. JADA 1999;130:191-9.
27. Use survey-1995. Clin Res Associates Newsletter 1995;19(10):4.
28. Murray PE, About I, Lumley PJ, Franquin JC, Remusat M, Smith AJ. Human odontoblast cell numbers after dental injury. J Dent 2000;28:277-85.
29. Murray PE, About I, Lumley PJ, Smith G, Franquin JC, Smith AJ. Postoperative pulpal and repair responses. JADA 2000;131:321-9.
30. Murray PE, Lumley PJ, Ross HT, Smith AJ. Tooth slice organ culture for cytotoxicity assessment of dental materials. Biomaterials 2000;21:1711-21.
31. Federation Dentaire International. Commission on Dental Materials, Instruments, Equipment and Therapeutics. Stanford JW. Recommended standard practices for the biological evaluation of dental materials. Int Dent J 1980;30:140-88.
32. ISO/EN 7405. Preclinical evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices used in dentistry: test methods for dental materials. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 1997.
33. Lillie RD, Fullmer HM. Histopathologic technique and practical histochemistry. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1976.
34. Langeland LK, Guttuso J, Jerome DR, Langeland K. Histologic and clinical comparison of Addent with silicate cements and cold-curing materials. JADA 1966;72:373-85.
35. Hebling J, Giro EM, Costa CA. Human pulp response after an adhesive system application in deep cavities. J Dent 1999;27:557-64.
36. Kitsano Y, Nakajima M, Pereira PN, et al. Monkey pulpal response and microtensile strength beneath a one-application resin bonding system in vivo. J Dent 2000;28:193-8.
37. Tjan AH, Tan DE, Sun JC, Tjan AH. Marginal leakage of amalgam restorations pretreated with various liners. Am J Dent 1997;10:284-6.
38. Cox CF, Hafez AA, Akimoto N, Otsuki N, Suzuki S, Tarim B. Biocompatibility of primer, adhesive and resin composite systems on non-exposed and exposed pulps of non-human primate teeth. Am J Dent 1998;11(special issue):S55-63.
39. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Curtis JW, Ergle JW, Rueggeberg FA, Adair SM. Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: results at year 10. JADA 1998;129:55-66.
40. van Dijken JW. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up. J Dent 2000;28:299-306.
41. Douglas WH. Clinical status of dentine bonding agents. J Dent 1989;17:209-15.
42. Brannstrom M, Nordenvall KJ. Bacterial penetration, pulpal reaction and the inner surface of Concise enamel bond: composite fillings in etched and unetched cavities. J Dent Res 1978;57:3-10.
43. Vojinovic O, Nyborg H, Brannstrom M. Acid treatment of cavities under resin fillings, bacterial growth in dentinal tubules and pulpal reactions. J Dent Res 1973;52:1189-93.
44. Retief DH, Austin JC, Fatti LP. Pulpal response to phosphoric acid. J Oral Pathol 1974;3:114-22.
45. Stanley HR, Going RE, Chauncey HH. Human pulp response to acid pre-treatment of dentin and to composite restoration. JADA 1975;91:817-25.
46. Macko DJ, Rutberg M, Langeland K. Pulpal response to the application of phosphoric acid to dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1978;45:930-46.
47. Eriksen HM, Leidal TI. Monkey pulpal response to composite resin restorations in cavities treated with various cleansing agents. Scand J Dent Res 1979;87:309-17.
48. Snuggs HM, Cox CF, Powell CS, White KC. Pulpal healing and dentinal bridge formation in an acidic environment. Quintessence Int 1993;24:501-10.
49. White KC, Cox CF, Kanca J III, Dixon DL, Farmer JB, Snuggs HM. Pulp response to adhesive resin systems applied to acid-etched vital dentin: damp versus dry application. Quintessence Int 1994;25:259-68.
50. Foreman PC, Barnes IE. Review of calcium hydroxide. Int Endod J 1990;23:283-97.
51. Leinfelder KF, Lemons JE. Clinical restorative materials and techniques. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1988:110.
52. Anusavice KJ, Phillips RW. Phillips' science of dental materials. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1996:552.
53. Stanley HR. Pulpal consideration of adhesive materials. Oper Dent 1992;5(suppl 5):151-64.