Comparison of pulp responses following restoration of exposed and non-exposed cavities

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 30, Issue 5-6, 2002, Pages 213-222

  Murray, P E ^a   Hafez, A A ^b   Windsor, L J ^a   Smith, A J ^c   Cox, C F ^d  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bacteria; Calcium hydroxide; Inflammation; Pulp capping; Resin composite; Tooth pulp

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; COLORING AGENT; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; FLUORESCENT DYE; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CELL COUNT; CELL DENSITY; DENTIN; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; INFLAMMATION; MORPHOMETRICS; ODONTOBLAST; OSSIFICATION; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH PULP; ANIMAL; BACTERIUM; CHEMISTRY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MACACA; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEUTROPHIL; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PULPITIS; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BACTERIA; CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; CELL COUNT; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLORING AGENTS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL PULP; DENTAL PULP CAPPING; DENTAL PULP EXPOSURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIN, SECONDARY; FLUORESCENT DYES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; MACACA MULATTA; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEUTROPHILS; ODONTOBLASTS; PULPITIS; RESIN CEMENTS;

EID: 0036652184     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00021-0     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Hilton T.J. Cavity sealers, liners, and bases: current philosophies and indications for use. Oper Dent 1996;21:134-46.
2. Kardos TB, Hunter AR, Hanlin SM, Kirk EE. Odontoblast differentiation; a response to environmental calcium? Endodont Dent Traumatol 1998;14:105-11.
3. Murray PE, About I, Lumley PJ, Smith G, Franquin JC, Smith AJ. Postoperative pulpal and repair responses. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:321-9.
4. Linde A, Goldberg M. Dentinogenesis. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1993;4:679-728.
5. Kawasaki K, Tanaka S, Ishikawa T. On the daily incremental lines in human dentin. Arch Oral Biol 1980;24:939-43.
6. Stanley HR, Swerdlow H. Reaction of the human pulp to cavity preparation; results produced by eight different grinding techniques. J Am Dent Assoc 1959;58:49-59.
7. Baume LJ. The biology of pulp and dentine. Monographs in oral science, Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 1980. p. 159-82.
8. Smith AJ, Cassidy N, Perry H, Begue-Kirn C, Ruch JV, Lesot H. Reactionary dentinogenesis. Int J Dev Biol 1995;39:273-80.
9. Cox CF, White KC, Ramus DL, Farmer JB, Snuggs HM. Reparative dentin: factors affecting its deposition. Quintessence Int 1992;23:257-70.
10. Ruch JV. Tooth morphogenesis and differentiation. In: Linde A, editor. Dentin and dentinogenesis, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1984. p. 47-9.
11. Yamamura T. Differentiation of pulpal cell and inductive influences of various matrices with reference to pulpal wound healing. J Dent Res 1985;64:530-40.
12. Fitzgerald M, Chiego Jr. DJ, Heys DR. Autoradiographic analysis of odontoblast replacement following pulp exposure in primate teeth. Arch Oral Biol 1990;35:707-15.
13. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, Syed SA. Bacterial microleakage around dental restorations; its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982;11:439-50.
14. Cox CF, Suzuki S. Re-evaluating pulp protection: calcium hydroxide liners versus cohesive hybridization. J Am Dent Assoc 1994;125:823-31.
15. Cox CF. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982;11:439-50.
16. Cox CF, Keall CL, Keall HJ, Ostro E, Bergenholtz G. Biocompatibility of surface sealed dental materials against exposed pulps. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:1-8.
17. Cox CF, Bergenholtz G, Fitzgerald M, Heys DR, Heys RJ, Avery JK, Baker JA. Capping of the dental pulp mechanically exposed to oral microflora-a 5 week observation of wound healing in the monkey. J Oral Pathol 1982;11:327-39.
18. Tarim D, Hafez AA, Cox CF. Pulpal response to a resin-modified glass ionomer material on non-exposed and exposed monkey pulps. Quintessence Int 1998;29:535-42.
19. Akimoto N, Momoi Y, Kohno A, Suzuki S, Otsuki M, Suzuki S, Cox CF. Biocompatibility of Clearfil liner bond 2 and clearfil AP-X system on non-exposed and exposed primate teeth. Quintessence Int 1998;29:177-88.
20. Murray PE, About I, Lumley PJ, Franquin JC, Remusat M, Smith AJ. Human odontoblast numbers after dental injury. J Dent 2000;28:277-85.
21. Mjör IA. Dentin and pulp. In: Mjor IA, editor. Reaction patterns in human teeth, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1983. p. 63-156.
22. Mjör IA, Dahl E, Cox CF. Healing of pulp exposures: an ultrastructural study. J Oral Pathol 1991;20:496-501.
23. Tziafas D. Mechanisms controlling secondary initiation of dentinogenesis: a review. Int Endodont J 1994;27:61-74.
24. Tziafas D. Basic mechanisms of cytodifferentiation and dentinogenesis during dental tissue repair. Int J Dev Biol 1995;39:281-90.
25. McKay GS. Gram stain modified to improve colour contrast. J Clin Pathol 1970;23:191.
26. Scheffe H. A method for judging all contrasts in the analysis of variance. Biometrika 1953;40:87-104.
27. Cox CF. Microleakage related to restorative procedures. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992;88(Suppl. 1):83-93.
28. Murray PE, About I, Lumley PJ, Franquin JC, Remusat M, Smith AJ. Cavity remaining dentin thickness and pulpal activity. Am J Dent 2002;15:41-6.
29. About I, Murray PE, Franquin J-C, Remusat R, Smith AJ. The effect of cavity restoration variables on odontoblast cell numbers and dental repair. J Dent 2001;29:109-17.
30. Murray PE, Lumley PJ, Smith AJ. Comparison of operative procedure variables on in vitro pulpal viability. Am J Dent 2002; in press.
31. Cox CF, Hafez AA, Akimoto N, Otsuki M, Suzuki S, Tarim B. Biocompatibility of primer, adhesive and resin composite systems on non-exposed and exposed pulps of non-human primate teeth. Am J Dent 1998;10:S55-S63.
32. Tziafas D, Smith AJ, Lesot H. Designing new treatment strategies in vital pulp therapy. J Dent 2000;28:77-92.
33. Dawson-Saunders B, Trapp RG. Basics and clinical biostats, 2nd ed. Norwalk, CT: Appleton/Lange; 1994. p. 210-31.
34. Baume LJ. The biology of pulp and dentine. Monographs in oral sciences, Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 1980. p. 159-82.
35. Lesot H, Smith AJ, Tziafas D, Begué-Kirn C, Cassidy N, Ruch J-V. Biologically active molecules and dental tissue repair; a comparative view of reactionary and reparative dentinogenesis with the introduction of odontoblast differentiation in vitro. Cells Mater 1994;4:199-218.
36. Smith AJ, Cassidy N, Plant CG, Browne RM, Bégue-Kirn C, Ruch J-V, Lesot H. Odontoblast stimulation in ferrets by dentine matrix components. Arch Oral Biol 1994;39:13-22.
37. Magloire H, Bouvier M, Joffe A. Odontoblast response under carious lesions. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992;88(Suppl. 1):257-74.
38. Diamond R, Stanley HR, Swerdlow H. Reparative dentin formation resulting from cavity preparation. J Prosthet Dent 1966;16:1127-34.
39. Bergenholtz G. Pathogenic mechanisms in pulpal disease. J Endodont 1990;16:98-101.
40. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, Syed SA. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations; its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982;11:439-50.
41. Maupome G, Sheiham A. Criteria for restoration replacement and restoration lifespan estimates in an educational environment. J Oral Rehab 1998;25:896-901.
42. Burke FJ, Cheung SW, Mjör IA, Wilson NH. Reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations in vocational training practices. Primary Dent Care 1999;6:17-20.
43. Tarim B, Hafez AA, Cox CF. Pulpal response a resin-modified glass-ionomer material on non-exposed and exposed monkey pulps. Quintessence Int 1998;29:535-42.
44. Osborne JW, Gale EN. Failure at the margin of amalgams as effected by cavity width, tooth position, and alloy selection. J Dent Res 1981;60:681-5.
45. Berry TG, Laswell HR, Osborne JW, Gale EN. Width of athimus and marginal failure of restorations of amalgam. Oper Dent 1981;6:55-8.
46. Ketterl W. Studie über das dentin der permanenten zahne des menschen (in german). Stomatologie 1961;14:79-96.
47. Mjör IA, Nordhal I. The density and branching of dentinal tubules in human teeth. Arch Oral Biol 1996;41:401-12.
48. Mjör IA, Sveen OB, Heyeraas KJ. Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. Part 1: normal structure and physiology. Quintessence Int 2001;32:427-46.
49. Stanley HR, Pereira JC, Spiegel E, Broom C, Schultz M. The detection and prevalence of reactive and physiologic sclerotic dentin, reparative dentin and dead tracts beneath various types of dental lesions according to tooth surface and age. J Oral Pathol 1983;12:257-89.
50. Hohl E. Beitrag zur istologie der pulpa und des dentins (in german). Arch Anat Physiol 1896;32:31-54.
51. 3H-thymidine into damaged pulp. J Dent Res 1970;49:783-5.
52. 3H-thymidine. J Dent Res 1979;58:2198-206.
53. Yamamura T. Differentiation of pulpal cell and inductive influences of various matrices with reference to pulpal wound healing. J Dent Res 1985;64:530-40.
54. Fitzgerald M, Chiego Jr. DJ, Heys DR. Autoradiographic analysis of odontoblast replacement following pulp exposure in primate teeth. Arch Oral Biol 1990;35:707-15.
55. Pameijer CH, Stanley HR. The disastrous effects of the Total Etch technique in vital pulp capping in primates. Am J Dent 1998;11(Spec Issue):S44-54.
56. Hebling J, Giro EMA, Costa CAS. Human pulp response after an adhesive system application in deep cavities. J Dent 1999;27:557-64.
57. Heitman T, Unterbrink G. Direct pulp capping with a dental adhesive resin system; a pilot study. Quintessence Int 1995;26:765-70.
58. Górecka V, Suliborski S, Biskupski T. Direct pulp capping with a dentin adhesive resin system in children's permanent teeth after traumatic injuries: case reports. Quintessence Int 2000;31:241-8.
59. Cox CF, Sübay RK, Ostro E, Suzuki S, Suzuki SH. Tunnel defects in dentin bridges: their formation following direct pulp capping. Oper Dent 1996;21:4-11.
60. Rutherford RB, Spangberg L, Tucker M, Charette M. Transdental stimulation of reparative dentine formation by osteogenic protein-1 in monkeys. Arch Oral Biol 1995;40:681-3.
61. Schuurs AHB, Gruythuysen RTM, Wesselink PR. Pulp capping with adhesive resin based composite vs. calcium hydroxide: a review. Endodont Dent Traumatol 2000;16:240-50.
62. Camps J, Dejou J, Remusat M, About I. Factors influencing pulpal response to cavity restorations. Dent Mater 2000;16:432-40.
63. Murray PE, About I, Franquin J-C, Remusat M, Smith AJ. Restorative pulpal and repair responses. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:482-91.
64. Bjørndal L, Thylstrup A. A practice-based study on stepwise excavation of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth. A 1-year follow-up study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998;26:122-8.
65. Murray PE, Lumley PJ, Hafez AA, Cox CF, Smith AJ. Preserving the vital pulp in opertive dentistry: 4. Factors influencing successful pulp capping. Dent Update 2002;29:225-30, 232-3.
66. Murray PE, Hafez A, Smith AJ, Cox CF. Hierarchy of pulp capping and repair activities responsible for dentin bridge formation. Am J Dent 2002; in press.
67. Hafez AA, Kopel HM, Cox CF. Pulpotomy reconsidered: application of an adhesive system to pulpotomized permanent primate pulps. Quintessence Int 2000;31:579-89.
68. Christensen GJ. Pulp capping. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:97-9.