The interactive influence of conscientiousness and openness to experience on dissent

Social Influence

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 202-219

  Packer, Dominic J ^a  

^a LEHIGH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conscientiousness; Dissent; Normative conflict model; Openness; Personality; Social identity

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953632231     PISSN: 15534510     EISSN: 15534529     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15534511003676441     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97-119.
2. Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009). The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 295-298.
3. Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimen- sionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80-114.
4. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
5. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Strauss, J. P. (1993). Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 715-722.
6. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley & Sons.
7. Crane, M. F., & Platow, M. J. (in press). Deviance as adherence to injunctive group norms: The overlooked role of social identification in deviance. British Journal of Social Psychology.
8. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
9. Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290-309.
10. George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When Openness to Experience and Conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513-524.
11. Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. E. (1982). Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1214-1229.
12. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses to a decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
14. Hornsey, M. J. (2006). Ingroup critics and their influence on groups. In T. Postmes & J. Jetten (Eds.), Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity (pp. 74-91). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
15. Hornsey, M. J., & Jetten, J. (2005). Loyalty without conformity: Tailoring self- perception as a means of balancing belonging and differentiation. Self and Identity, 4, 81-95.
16. Hornsey, M. J., Smith, J. R., & Begg, D. (2007). Effects of norms among those with moral conviction: Counter-conformity emerges on intentions but not behaviors. Social Influence, 2, 244-268.
17. Iyer, A., Schmader, T., & Lickel, B. (2007). Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: The role of anger, shame and guilt. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 572-587.
18. Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascos. Oxford, UK: Houghton Mifflin.
19. Jetten, J., Postmes, T., & McAuliffe, B. J. (2002). 'We're all individuals': Group norms of individualism and collectivism, levels of identification and identity threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 189-207.
20. John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The 'big five' inventory - Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
21. Johnson, K. L., & White, K. M. (2003). Binge-drinking: A test of the role of group norms in the theory of planned behavior. Psychology and Health, 18, 63-77.
22. Judge, T. A., & Illies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 797-807.
23. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.
24. McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential Openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323-337.
25. McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.
26. Morton, T. A., Postmes, T., & Jetten, J. (2007). Playing the game: When group success is more important than downgrading deviants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 599-616.
27. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24, 43-51.
28. Packer, D. J. (2008). On being both with us and against us: A normative conflict model of dissent in social groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 50-73.
29. Packer, D. J. (2009). Avoiding groupthink: Whereas weakly identified members remain silent, strongly identified members dissent about collective problems. Psychological Science, 20, 546-548.
30. Packer, D. J., & Chasteen, A. L. (2010). Loyal deviance: Testing the normative conflict model of dissent in social groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 5-18.
31. Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Swaab, R. (2005). Social influence in small groups: An interactive model of social identity formation. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 1-42.
32. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lee, A. T., & Novak, R. J. (2005). Individuality and social influence in groups: Inductive and deductive routes to group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 747-763.
33. Roccas, S., Klar, Y., & Liviatan, I. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group's moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 698-711.
34. Sani, F., & Todman, J. (2002). Should we stay or should we go? A social psychological model of schisms in groups. Personality and Social Psychological bulletin, 28, 1647-1655.
35. Santee, R. T., & Maslach, C. (1982). To agree or not to agree: Personal dissent amid social pressure to conform. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 690-700.
36. Shiller, R. J. (2008). Challenging the crowd in whispers, not shouts. The New York Times [electronic version]. Retrieved 2 November 2008 from: www.nytimes.com
37. Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology bulletin, 23, 538-553.
38. Spears, R., Lea, M., Corneliussen, R. A., Postmes, T., & Ter Haar, W. (2002). Computer-mediated communication as a channel for social resistance. Small Group Research, 33, 555-574.
39. Stewart, G. L. (1999). Trait bandwidth and stages of job performance: Assessing differential effects for conscientiousness and its subtraits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 959-968.
40. Sunstein, C. R. (2006). Infotopia: How many minds produce knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychological bulletin, 22, 776-795.
42. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
43. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349-361.
44. Verkuyten, M., & Hagendoorn, L. (1998). Prejudice and self-categorization: The variable role of authoritarianism and in-group stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 99-110.