Ingroup critics and their influence on groups

Individuality and the Group: Advances in Social Identity

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 74-92

  Hornsey, Matthew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949552786     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781446211946.n5     Document Type: Chapter

References (62)

1. Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Bown, N., & Henson, M. (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 906-912. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.906
2. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper & Row.
3. Asch, S. E. (1952). Effects of group pressures upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In G. E.Swanson, T. M.Newcomb, & E. L.Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 393-101). New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
4. Branscombe, N., Wann, D. L., Noel, J. G., & Coleman, J. (1993). In-group or out-group extremity: Importance of the threatened social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 381-388. doi:10.1177/0146167293194003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167293194003
5. Brewer, M. B. (1981). Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust. In M. B.Brewer & B. E.Collins (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and the social sciences (pp. 345-360). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Duck, J. M., & Fielding, K. S. (2003). Leaders and their treatment of subgroups: Implications for evaluations of the leader and the superordinate group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 387-401. doi:10.1002/ejsp.153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.153
7. Elder, T. J., Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2005). Keeping it to ourselves: Effects of audience size and composition on reactions to criticism of the ingroup. Manuscript under review.
8. Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282. doi:10.1037/h0056932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0056932
9. Ford, L. (2004). Public versus private responses to group criticism. Unpublished honours thesis, University of Queensland.
10. Friend, R., Rafferty, Y., & Bramel, D. (1990). A puzzling misinterpretation of the Asch "conformity" study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 29-44. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420200104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420200104
11. Gruenfeld, D. H., & Fan, E. T. (1999). What newcomers see and what oldtimers say: Discontinuities in knowledge exchange. In L. L.Thompson, J. M.Levine, & D. M.Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 245-265). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Haney, C., Banks, C., & Zimbardo, P. (1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1, 69-97.
13. Haslam, S. A. (1997). Stereotyping and social influence: Foundations of stereotype consensus. In R.Spears, P. J.Oakes, N.Ellemers, & S. A.Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 119-143). Oxford: Blackwell.
14. Hollander, E. P. (1958). Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit. Psychological Review, 65, 117-127. doi:10.1037/h0042501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0042501
15. Hornsey, M. J., de Bruijn, P., Creed, J., Allen, J., Ariyanto, A., & Svensson, A. (2005). Keeping it in-house: How audience affects responses to group criticism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 291-312. doi:10.1002/ejsp.246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.246
16. Hornsey, M. J., Grice, T., Jetten, J., Paulsen, N., & Callan, V. (2005). Group-directed criticisms and recommendations for change: Why newcomers arouse more defensiveness than old-timers. Manuscript under review.
17. Hornsey, M. J., & Imani, A. (2004). Criticizing groups from the inside and the outside: An identity perspective on the intergroup sensitivity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 365-383. doi:10.1177/0146167203261295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167203261295
18. Hornsey, M. J., & Jetten, J. (2004). The individual within the group: Balancing the need to belong with the need to be different. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 248-264. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_2
19. Hornsey, M. J., Jetten, J., McAuliffe, B. J., & Hogg, M. A. (in press). The impact of individualist and collectivist group norms on evaluations of dissenting group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
20. Hornsey, M. J., Oppes, T., & Svensson, A. (2002). "It's ok if we say it, but you can't": Responses to intergroup and intragroup criticism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 293-307. doi:10.1002/ejsp.90 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.90
21. Hornsey, M. J., Trembath, M., & Gunthorpe, S. (2004). "You can criticize because you care": Identity attachment, constructiveness, and the intergroup sensitivity effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 499-518. doi:10.1002/ejsp.212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.212
22. Insko, C. A., Schopler, J., Hoyle, R. H., Dardis, G. J., & Graetz, K. A. (1990). Individual-group discontinuity as a function of fear and greed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 68-79. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.68 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.68
23. Jackson, K. (2003). Susan Sontag in the wars. Weekend Australian, 22-23 November, p. R4.
24. Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
25. Jetten, J., Duck, J., Terry, D. J., & O'Brien, A. (2002). Being attuned to intergroup differences in mergers: The role of aligned leaders and low-status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1194-1201. doi:10.1177/01461672022812005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01461672022812005
26. Jetten, J., Hornsey, M. J., & Adarves-Yorno, I. (in press). When group members admit to being conformist: The role of relative intragroup status in conformity self-reports. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
27. Jetten, J., Hornsey, M. J., Spears, R., Haslam, S. A., & Cowell, E. (2005). Keeping up appearances: The conditional nature of peripheral group members' loyalty expressions and actions. Revision under review.
28. Kelman, H. C. (1995). Decision making and public discourse in the Gulf War: An assessment of underlying psychological and moral assumptions. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 1, 117-130. doi:10.1207/s15327949pac0102_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327949pac0102_2
29. Khan, S., & Lambert, A. (1998). Ingroup favoritism versus black sheep effects in observations of informal conversations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 263-269. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2004_3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2004_3
30. Kim, H., & Markus, H. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 785-800. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.785
31. Le Bon, G. (1908). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. London: Unwin (original work published 1896). doi:10.1037/10878-000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10878-000
32. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1985). Innovation and socialization in small groups. In S.Mocovici, G.Mugny, & E.van Avermaet (Eds.), Perspectives on minority influence (pp. 143-169). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511897566.009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511897566.009
33. Mackie, D. M., Worth, L. T., & Asuncion, A. G. (1990). Processing of persuasive in group messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 812-822. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.812
34. Marques, J. M., & Paez, D. (1994). The "black sheep effect": Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 37-68. doi:10.1080/14792779543000011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14792779543000011
35. Marques, J., & Yzerbyt, V. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter- and intra-group situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 287-292. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420180308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180308
36. Marques, J., Yzerbyt, V., & Leyens, J. (1988). The black sheep effect: Extremity of judgements towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1-16. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420180102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180102
37. Matheson, K., Cole, B., and Majka, K. (2003). Dissidence from within: Examining the effects of intergroup context on group members' reactions to attitudinal opposition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 161-169. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00515-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031%2802%2900515-2
38. McAuliffe, B. J., Jetten, J., Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2003). Individualist and collectivist group norms: When it's OK to go your own way. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 57-70. doi:10.1002/ejsp.129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.129
39. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority. London: Tavistock.
40. Moreland, R. L., & McMinn, J. G. (1999). Gone but not forgotten: Loyalty and betrayal among ex-members of small groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1476-1486. doi:10.1177/01461672992510004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01461672992510004
41. Morray, J. P. (1959). Pride of state. Boston: Beacon.
42. Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. London: Academic.
43. Nemeth, C. J. (1985). Dissent, group process and creativity: The contribution of minority influence. In J. E.Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes (pp. 57-75). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
44. Noel, J. G., Wann, D. L., & Branscombe, N. R. (1995). Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 127-137. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.127
45. O'Dwyer, A., Berkowitz, N. H., & Alfeld-Johnson, D. (2002). Group and person attributions in response to criticism of the in-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 563-588. doi:10.1348/014466602321149885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466602321149885
46. Platow, M. J., Hoar, S., Reid, S., Harley, K., & Morrison, D. (1997). Endorsement of distributively fair and unfair leaders in interpersonal and intergroup situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 465-494. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199707)27:4<465::AID-EJSP817>3.0.CO;2-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-0992%28199707%2927:4%3C465::AID-EJSP817%3E3.0.CO;2-8
47. Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Cihangir, S. (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 918-930. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.918
48. Reicher, S. D. (1987). Crowd behaviour as social action. In J. C.Turner, M. A.Hogg, P. J.Oakes, S. D.Reicher, & M. S.Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorisation theory (pp. 171-202). Oxford: Blackwell.
49. Reicher, S. (1996). "The Battle of Westminster": Developing the social identity model of crowd behaviour in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 115-134. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199601)26:1<115::AID-EJSP740>3.0.CO;2-Z http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-0992%28199601%2926:1%3C115::AID-EJSP740%3E3.0.CO;2-Z
50. Reicher, S., & Hopkins, N. (1996). Seeking influence through characterizing self-categories: An analysis of anti-abortionist rhetoric. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 297-311. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01099.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01099.x
51. Sani, F., & Reicher, S. D. (1998). When consensus fails: An analysis of the schism within the Italian Communist Party (1991). European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 623-645. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199807/08)28:4<623::AID-EJSP885>3.0.CO;2-G http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-0992%28199807/08%2928:4%3C623::AID-EJSP885%3E3.0.CO;2-G
52. Schachter, S. (1951). Deviation, rejection, and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 190-207. doi:10.1037/h0062326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0062326
53. Schatz, R. T., Staub, E., & Lavine, H. (1999). On the varieties of national attachment: Blind versus constructive patriotism. Political Psychology, 20, 151-174. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00140
54. Sommerville, J. (1981). Patriotism and war. Ethics, 91, 568-578. doi:10.1086/292271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/292271
55. Tajfel, H. (Ed.), (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic.
56. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G.Austin & S.Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
57. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Buckingham: Open University Press.
58. Turner, J. C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N.Ellemers, R.Spears, & B.Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 6-34). Oxford: Blackwell.
59. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York: Blackwell.
60. Vivian, J. E., & Berkowitz, N. H. (1992). Anticipated bias from an outgroup: An attributional analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 415-424. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420220410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220410
61. Worchel, S. (1979). Trust and distrust. In W. G.Austin & S.Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 174-187). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
62. Zdaniuk, B., & Levine, J. M. (2001). Group loyalty: Impact of members' identification and contributions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 502-509. doi:10.1006/jesp.2000.1474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1474