Playing the game: When group success is more important than downgrading deviants

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 599-616

  Morton, Thomas A ^a   Postmes, Tom ^a   Jetten, Jolanda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547147373     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.385     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Bown, N., & Henson, M. (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 906-912.
2. Abrams, D., Randsley de Moura, G., Hutchison, P., «fe Viki, G. T. (2005). When bad becomes good (and vice versa): Why social exclusion is not based on difference. In D. Abrams, M. Hogg, & J. Marques (Eds.), The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 161-189). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
3. Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2000). You can't always do what you want: Social identity and self-presentational determinants of choice to work for a low-status group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 891-906.
4. Barreto, M. & Ellemers, N. (2002), The impact of anonymity and group identification on pro-group behaviour in computer mediated groups: Small Group Research. Special European Views of Computer-Mediated Communication, 33, 590-610.
5. Branscombe, N., Wann, D., Noel, J., & Coleman, J. (1993). In-group or out-group extremity: Importance of threatened social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 381-388.
6. Castano, E., Paladino, M., Coull, A., & Yzerbyt, V. (2002). Protecting the ingroup stereotype: Ingroup identification and the management of deviant ingroup members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 365-385.
7. Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Stereotyping under threat: The role of group identification. In R. Spears, P. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S.A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 257-272), Oxford, England: Blackwell.
8. Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together of falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 72, 617-626.
9. Ellemers, N., van Dyck, C., Hinkle, S., & Jacobs, A. (2000). Intergroup differentiation in social context: Identity needs versus audience constraints. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 60-74.
10. Golan, O. (5th June 2004). Interview: Pat Richardson. The times magazine (pp. 45-46), London: Times Newspaper Limited.
11. Hogg, M. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184-200.
12. Hollander, E. P. (1958). Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit. Psychological Review, 65, 117-127.
13. Hornsey, M. J. (2006). Individuals influencing groups: The case of the ingroup critic. In T. Postmes & J. Jetten (Eds.), Individuality in the group: Advances in social Identity. London: Sage.
14. Hornsey, M. J., Jetten, J., McAuliffe, B. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2006). The impact of individualist and collectivist group norms on evaluations of dissenting group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 57-68.
15. Hutchinson, P., & Abrams, D. (2003). Ingroup identification moderates stereotypes change in reaction to ingroup deviance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 497-506.
16. Jetten, J., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & McKimmie, B. M. (2003). Predicting the paths of peripherals: The interaction of identification and future possibilities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 130-140.
17. Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., Paez, D., & Martinez-Toboada, C. (1998a). The role of categorisation and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 976-988.
18. Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., & Serôdio, R. G. (2001). Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of ingroup deviants when generic norms are undermined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 436-477.
19. Marques, J. M., Paez, D., & Abrams, D. (1998b). Social identity and intragroup differentiation as subjective social control. In S. Worchel, J. Morales, D. Paez, & J.-C. Deschamps (Eds.), Social identity: International perspectives (pp. 124-141). New York: Sage.
20. Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V., & Leyens, J.-P. (1988). Extremity of judgments toward ingroup members as a function of ingroup identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1-16.
21. Matheson, K., Cole, B., & Majaka, K. (2002). Dissidence from within: Examining the effects of intergroup context on group members' reaction to attitudinal opposition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 161-169.
22. McGraw, K., Lodge, M., & Jones, J. (2002). The pandering politicians of suspicious minds. The Journal of Politics, 64, 362-383.
23. Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behaviour. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 209-239.
24. Reicher, S. (2000). Social identity definition and enactment: A broad SIDE against irrationalism and relativism. In T. Postmes, R. Spears, M. Lea, & S. Reicher (Eds.), SIDE issues centre stage: Recent developments in studies of de-individuation in groups (pp. 175-190). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
25. Reicher, S., & Levine, M. (1994a). Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effect of visibility to the out-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 145-163.
26. Reicher, S. & Levine, M. (1994b). On the consequences of deindividuation manipulations for the strategic communication of the self: Identifiability and the presentation of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 511-524.
27. Reicher, S., Levine, M., & Gordijn, E. (1998). More on deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: Three studies on the effects of visibility to the in-group. British Journal of Social psychology, 37, 15-40.
28. Reicher, S., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 161-198.
29. Sani, F. (2005). When subgroups secede: Extending and refining the social psychological model of schisms in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1074-1086.
30. Scheepers, D., Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Manstead, A. (2003). Integrating identity and instrumental approaches to intergroup differentiation: Different contexts, different motives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1455-1467.
31. Spears, R., Lea, M., Comeliussen, R. A., Postmes, T., & Ter Haar, W. (2002). Computer-mediated communication as a channel for social resistance-The strategic side of SIDE. Small Group Research, 33, 555-574.
32. Tabachnick, B. & Fidell, L. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper Collins.
33. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
34. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
35. Tetlock, P. E. (2002). Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: Intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors. Psychological Review, 109, 451-471.