RNA: State memory and mediator of cellular phenotype

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 311-318

  Kim, Junhyong ^a   Eberwine, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL PROTEIN; RNA; TRANSCRIPTOME;

ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL HETEROGENEITY; CELL MOTION; CELL TRANSFER; CELL TYPE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RNA ANALYSIS; RNA STABILITY;

ANIMALS; CELL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HUMANS; PHENOTYPE; RNA; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 77953535926     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Stevens P.F. The Development of Biological Systematics 1994, Columbia University Press.
2. Hull D.L. Science as a Process 1990, University of Chicago Press.
3. Jardine N., Sibson R. Mathematical Taxonomy 1971, Wiley.
4. Frost J.K. An evaluation of cellular morphologic expression of biologic behavior. Monogr. Clin. Cytol. 1961, 2:1-142.
5. Salmoiraghi G.C., Bloom F.E. Pharmacology of individual neurons. Science 1964, 144:493-499.
6. Alizadeh A.A., et al. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature 2000, 403:503-511.
7. Mischel P.S., et al. DNA-microarray analysis of brain cancer: molecular classification for therapy. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 5:782-792.
8. Lein E.S., et al. Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature 2007, 445:168-176.
9. Sharova L.V., et al. Global gene expression profiling reveals similarities and differences among mouse pluripotent stem cells of different origins and strains. Dev. Biol. 2007, 307:446-459.
10. Yanaihara N., et al. Unique microRNA molecular profiles in lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Cancer Cell 2006, 9:189-198.
11. Ramaswamy S., et al. A molecular signature of metastasis in primary solid tumors. Nat. Genet. 2003, 33:49-54.
12. Giordano T.J., et al. Organ-specific molecular classification of primary lung, colon, and ovarian adenocarcinomas using gene expression profiles. Am. J. Pathol. 2001, 159:1231-1238.
13. Chung C.H., et al. Molecular portraits and the family tree of cancer. Nat. Genet. 2002, 32(Suppl.):533-540.
14. Yanagisawa K., et al. Proteomic patterns of tumour subsets in non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet 2003, 362:433-439.
15. Muller F.J., et al. Regulatory networks define phenotypic classes of human stem cell lines. Nature 2008, 455:401-405.
16. Mackler S.A., et al. Stimulus-induced coordinate changes in mRNA abundance in single postsynaptic hippocampal CA1 neurons. Neuron 1992, 9:539-548.
17. Hemby S.E., et al. Gene expression profile for schizophrenia: discrete neuron transcription patterns in the entorhinal cortex. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2002, 59:631-640.
18. Lovatt D., et al. The transcriptome and metabolic gene signature of protoplasmic astrocytes in the adult murine cortex. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:12255-12266.
19. Cauli B., et al. Classification of fusiform neocortical interneurons based on unsupervised clustering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000, 97:6144-6149.
20. Furey T.S., et al. Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data. Bioinformatics 2000, 16:906-914.
21. Yamagata N., et al. A training-testing approach to the molecular classification of resected non-small cell lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2003, 9:4695-4704.
22. Yeang C.H., et al. Molecular classification of multiple tumor types. Bioinformatics 2001, 17(Suppl. 1):S316-S322.
23. Shipp M.A., et al. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outcome prediction by gene-expression profiling and supervised machine learning. Nat. Med. 2002, 8:68-74.
24. Sugino K., et al. Molecular taxonomy of major neuronal classes in the adult mouse forebrain. Nat. Neurosci. 2006, 9:99-107.
25. Waddington C.H. The basic ideas of biology. The Origin of Life: Towards a Theoretical Biology 1968, 1-32. Aldine. C.H. Waddington (Ed.).
26. Waddington C.H. Principles of Embryology 1956, Allen & Unwin.
27. Keller G. Embryonic stem cell differentiation: emergence of a new era in biology and medicine. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:1129-1155.
28. Odorico J.S., et al. Multilineage differentiation from human embryonic stem cell lines. Stem Cells 2001, 19:193-204.
29. Suh H., et al. In vivo fate analysis reveals the multipotent and self-renewal capacities of Sox2+ neural stem cells in the adult hippocampus. Cell Stem Cell 2007, 1:515-528.
30. Lowry N.A., Temple S. Making human neurons from stem cells after spinal cord injury. PLoS Med. 2007, 4:e48.
31. Gurdon J.B., et al. Sexually mature individuals of Xenopus laevis from the transplantation of single somatic nuclei. Nature 1958, 182:64-65.
32. Gurdon J.B. From nuclear transfer to nuclear reprogramming: the reversal of cell differentiation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2006, 22:1-22.
33. Munoz-Sanjuan I., Brivanlou A.H. Neural induction, the default model and embryonic stem cells. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3:271-280.
34. Hulskamp M. Plant trichomes: a model for cell differentiation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 5:471-480.
35. Jacob J., et al. Temporal control of neuronal diversity: common regulatory principles in insects and vertebrates?. Development 2008, 135:3481-3489.
36. Sieweke M.H., Graf T. A transcription factor party during blood cell differentiation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1998, 8:545-551.
37. Alper H., Stephanopoulos G. Global transcription machinery engineering: a new approach for improving cellular phenotype. Metab. Eng. 2007, 9:258-267.
38. Takahashi K., et al. Identification of genes involved in tumor-like properties of embryonic stem cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 2006, 329:449-458.
39. Nakagawa M., et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26:101-106.
40. Wernig M., et al. c-Myc is dispensable for direct reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts. Cell Stem Cell 2008, 2:10-12.
41. Liao J., et al. Enhanced efficiency of generating induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells from human somatic cells by a combination of six transcription factors. Cell Res. 2008, 18:600-603.
42. Mali P., et al. Improved efficiency and pace of generating induced pluripotent stem cells from human adult and fetal fibroblasts. Stem Cells 2008, 26:1998-2005.
43. Huangfu D., et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from primary human fibroblasts with only Oct4 and Sox2. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26:1269-1275.
44. Kim J.B., et al. Oct4-induced pluripotency in adult neural stem cells. Cell 2009, 136:411-419.
45. Magnus T., et al. Stem cell myths. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2008, 363:9-22.
46. Discher D.E., et al. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 2005, 310:1139-1143.
47. Sul J.Y., et al. Transcriptome transfer produces a predictable cellular phenotype. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:7624-7769.
48. Bar-Joseph Z., et al. Computational discovery of gene modules and regulatory networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21:1337-1342.
49. Barabasi A.L., Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 1999, 286:509-512.
50. Butte A.J., Kohane I.S. Mutual information relevance networks: functional genomic clustering using pairwise entropy measurements. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 2000, 418-429.
51. Segal E., et al. Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data. Nat. Genet. 2003, 34:166-176.
52. Magwene P.M., Kim J. Estimating genomic coexpression networks using first-order conditional independence. Genome Biol. 2004, 5:R100.
53. Ideker T., Lauffenburger D. Building with a scaffold: emerging strategies for high- to low-level cellular modeling. Trends Biotechnol. 2003, 21:255-262.
54. De Jong D., et al. Probing the energy landscape of protein folding/unfolding transition states. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 319:229-242.
55. Qi L., et al. Genetic regulation by non-coding RNAs. Sci. China C Life. Sci. 2006, 49:201-217.
56. Sontag L.B., et al. Dynamics, stability and inheritance of somatic DNA methylation imprints. J. Theor. Biol. 2006, 242:890-899.
57. Csete M.E., Doyle J.C. Reverse engineering of biological complexity. Science 2002, 295:1664-1669.
58. Thom R. Stabilité Structurelle et Morphogénèse, Essai d'une Théorie Générale des Modèles 1971, Benjamin.
59. Rappel W.J., Strogatz S.H. Stochastic resonance in an autonomous system with a nonuniform limit cycle. Phys. Rev. E Stat. 1994, 50:3249-3250.
60. Thattai M., van Oudenaarden A. Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001, 98:8614-8619.
61. Van Gelder R.N., et al. Amplified RNA synthesized from limited quantities of heterogeneous cDNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1990, 87:1663-1667.
62. Eberwine J., et al. mRNA expression analysis of tissue sections and single cells. J. Neurosci. 2001, 21:8310-8314.
63. Miyashiro K., et al. On the nature and differential distribution of mRNAs in hippocampal neurites: implications for neuronal functioning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994, 91:10800-10804.
64. Janicki S.M., et al. From silencing to gene expression: real-time analysis in single cells. Cell 2004, 116:683-698.
65. Kamme F., Erlander M.G. Global gene expression analysis of single cells. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Dev. 2003, 6:231-236.
66. Levsky J.M., et al. Single-cell gene expression profiling. Science 2002, 297:836-840.
67. Mettetal J.T., et al. Predicting stochastic gene expression dynamics in single cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103:7304-7309.
68. Tietjen I., et al. Single-cell transcriptional profiles and spatial patterning of the mammalian olfactory epithelium. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2005, 49:201-207.
69. Wagatsuma A., et al. Determination of the exact copy numbers of particular mRNAs in a single cell by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. J. Exp. Biol. 2005, 208:2389-2398.
70. Engler A.J., et al. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126:677-689.
71. McBeath R., et al. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev. Cell 2004, 6:483-495.
72. Hall B.K. Waddington's legacy in development and evolution. Am. Zool. 1992, 32:113-122.