Transcriptome transfer produces a predictable cellular phenotype

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 106, Issue 18, 2009, Pages 7624-7629

  Sul, Jai Yoon ^a   Wu, Chia Wen K ^a   Zeng, Fanyi ^a,b   Jochems, Jeanine ^a   Lee, Miler T ^a   Kim, Tae Kyung ^a   Peritz, Tiina ^a   Buckley, Peter ^a   Cappelleri, David J ^c   Maronski, Margaret ^a   Kim, Minsun ^d   Kumar, Vijay ^a,c   Meaney, David ^a,c   Kim, Junhyong ^a   Rwine, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^d Wonkwang University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Neuron; Single cell waddington; Transcriptome induced phenotype remodeling

Indexed keywords

RNA; TRANSCRIPTOME; BIOLOGICAL MARKER; MESSENGER RNA;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ASTROCYTE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL POPULATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL TRANSFORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REGULATORY RNA SEQUENCE; RNA TRANSPORT; ANIMAL; CELL CULTURE; CELL TRANSDIFFERENTIATION; CYTOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC TRANSFECTION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

RATTUS;

ANIMALS; ASTROCYTES; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL TRANSDIFFERENTIATION; CELLS, CULTURED; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; NEURONS; RATS; RNA, MESSENGER; TRANSFECTION; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS;

EID: 66149128896     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0902161106     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Waddington (1957) The Strategy of the Genes: a Discussion of Some Aspects of Theoretical Biology (George Allen &Unwin, London).
2. Gurdon JB, Elsdale TR, Fischberg M (1958) Sexually mature individuals of Xenopus laevis from the transplantation of single somatic nuclei. Nature 182(4627):64-65.
3. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S (2006) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126(4):663-676.
4. Huangfu D, et al. (2008) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from primary human fibroblasts with only Oct4 and Sox2. Nat Biotechnol 26(11):1269-1275.
5. Kim JB, et al. (2008) Pluripotent stem cells induced from adult neural stem cells by reprogramming with two factors. Nature 454(7204):646 -650.
6. Nakagawa M, et al. (2008) Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts. Nat Biotechnol 26(1):101-106.
7. Maherali N, et al. (2007) Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell 1(1):55-70.
8. Okita K, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S (2007) Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 448(7151):313-317.
9. Stadtfeld M, Nagaya M, Utikal J, Weir G, Hochedlinger K (2008) Induced pluripotent stem cells generated without viral integration. Science 322(5903):945-949.
10. Wernig M, et al. (2008) Neurons derived from reprogrammed fibroblasts functionally integrate into the fetal brain and improve symptoms of rats with Parkinson's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(15):5856 -5861.
11. Hanna J, et al. (2007) Treatment of sickle cell anemia mouse model with iPS cells generated from autologous skin. Science 318(5858):1920-1923.
12. Barrett LE, et al. (2006) Region-directed phototransfection reveals the functional significance of a dendritically synthesized transcription factor. Nat Methods 3(6):455-460.
13. Anderson DJ, Gage FH, Weissman IL (2001) Can stem cells cross lineage boundaries? Nat Med 7(4):393-395.
14. Valles S, Pitrach J, Renau-Piqueras J, Guerri C (1997) Ethanol exposure affects glial fibrillary acidic protein gene expression and transcription during rat brain development. J Neurochem 69:2484-2493.
15. Rowe EW, Jeftinija DM, Jeftinija K, Jeftinija S (2005) Development of functional neurons from postnatal stem cells in vitro. Stem Cells 23(8):1044-1049.
16. Gentleman RC, et al. (2004) Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 5(10):R80.
17. D'Amour KA, Gage FH (2002) Are somatic stem cells pluripotent or lineage-restricted?Nat Med 8(3):213-214.
18. Zhang J, et al. (2008) Altered proteome biology of cardiac mitochondria under stress conditions. J Proteome Res 7(6):2204-2214.
19. Loreau M, et al. (2001) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294(5543):804-808.
20. McCook LJ (1994) Understanding ecological community succession: causal models and theories, a review. Plant Ecology110(2):115-147.
21. Thomson JN et al. (2001) Frontiers of Ecology. Bio Science 51(1):15-24.
22. Cummings DD, Wilcox KS, Dichter MA (1996) Calcium-dependent paired-pulse facilitation of miniature EPSC frequency accompanies depression of EPSCs at hippocampal synapses in culture. J Neurosci 16:5312.
23. Van Gelder RN, et al. (1990) Amplified RNA synthesized from limited quantities of heterogeneous cDNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:1663.
24. Eberwine J, Crino P (2001) Analysis of mRNA populations from single live and fixed cells of the central nervous system. Curr Prot Neurosci Chapter 5, Unit 5 3.
25. Eberwin J (2001) Single cell molecular biology. Nat Neurosci 4 Suppl, 1155-1156.
26. Fukaya T, et al. (2007) Arachidonic acid preserves hippocampal neuron membrane fluidity in senescent rats. Neurobiol Aging 28(8):1179-1186.
27. Neufeld EJ, Majerus PW, Krueger CM, Saffitz JE (1985) Uptake and subcellular distribution of [3H]arachidonic acid in murine fibrosarcoma cells measured by electron microscope autoradiography. J Cell Biol 101(2):573-581.
28. Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA, Astrand M, Speed TP (2003) A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics 19:185-193.
29. Bolsdtad B (2005) affyPLM: Methods for fitting Probe-lvel models. In R package (Bioconductor, www.bioconductor.org).