Evaluation of a three-dimensional educational computer model of the larynx: Voicing a new direction

Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 315-322

  Hu, Amanda ^a   Wilson, Tim ^a   Ladak, Hanif ^a   Haase, Peter ^a   Doyle, Philip ^a   Fung, Kevin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Computer modeling; Larynx; Medical education; Three dimensional imaging

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; FEMALE; HUMAN; LARYNX; LEARNING; MALE; MULTIMEDIA; NECK; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TEACHING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOMOGRAPHY; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY;

FEMALE; HUMANS; LARYNX; MALE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; OTOLARYNGOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77953518283     PISSN: 19160216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/7070.2010.090074     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Cottam WW. Adequacy of medical school gross anatomy education as perceived by certain postgraduate residency programs and anatomy course directors. Clin Anat 1999;12:55-65.
2. Leung KK, Lu KS, Huang TS, et al. Anatomy instruction in medical schools: connecting the past and the future. Adv Health Sci Educ 2006;11:209-15.
3. Bernard GR. Prosection demonstrations as substitutes for the conventional human gross anatomy laboratory. J Med Educ 1972;47:724-8.
4. McLachlan JC, Bligh J, Bradley P, et al. Teaching anatomy without cadavers. Med Educ 2004;38:418-24.
5. Scott TM. How we teach anatomy efficiently and effectively. Med Teach 1993;15:67-75.
6. Parker LM. What's wrong with the dead body? Use of the human cadaver in medical education. Med J Aust 2002;176:74-6.
7. Prince KJAH, Mameren H van, Hylkema N, et al. Does problem-based learning lead to deficiencies in basic science knowledge? An empirical case on anatomy. Med Educ 2003;37:15-21.
8. Nnodim JO, Ohanaka EC, Osuji CU. A follow-up comparative study of two modes of learning human anatomy: by dissection and from prosections. Clin Anat 1996;9:258-62.
9. Nicholson DR, Chalk C, Funnell WRJ, et al. Can virtual reality improve anatomy education? A randomised controlled study of a computer-generated three-dimensional anatomical ear model. Med Educ 2006;40:1081-7.
10. Hu A, Wilson T, Ladak H, et al. Three-dimensional educational computer model of the larynx: voicing a new direction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;135:677-81.
11. Garg A, Norman GR, Spero L, et al. Do virtual computer models hinder anatomy learning? Acad Med 1999;7410 Suppl:S87-9.
12. Garg AX, Norman G, Perotable L. How medical students learn spatial anatomy. Lancet 2001;357:363-4. (Pubitemid 32128548)
13. Garg AX, Norman GR, Eva KW, et al. Is there any real virtue of virtual reality? The minor role of multiple orientations in learning anatomy from computers. Acad Med 2002;77(10 Suppl):S97-9.
14. Jolicoeur P, Milliken BW. Identification of disoriented objects: effects of context and prior presentation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1989;15:200-10.
15. Shepard RN, Metzler J. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 1971;171:701-3.
16. Curry L. Cognitive and learning styles in medical education. Acad Med 1999;74:409-13. (Pubitemid 29196170)
17. Kolb DA. Individual learning styles and the learning process. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1971.
18. Engleberg NC, Schwenk T, Gruppen LD. Learning styles and perceptions of the value of various learning modalities before and after a 2nd year course in microbiology and infectious diseases. Teach Learn Med 2001;13:253-7. (Pubitemid 33658024)
19. Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR, et al. The educational impact of bench model fidelity on the acquisition of technical skill: the use of clinical relevant outcome measures. Ann Surg 2004;240:374-81.
20. Matsumoto ED, Hamstra SJ, Radomski SB, et al. The effect of bench model fidelity on endourological skills: a randomized controlled study. J Urol 2002;167:1243-7.
21. Anastakis DJ, Regehr G, Reznick RK, et al. Assessment of technical skills transfer from the bench training model to the human model. Am J Surg 1999;177:167-70.
22. Friedman Z, You-Ten KE, Bould MD, et al. Teaching lifesaving procedures: the impact of model fidelity on acquisition and transfer of cricothyrotomy skills to performance on cadavers. Anesth Analg 2008;107:1663-9.
23. Chandra EB, Savoldelli GI, Joo HS, et al. Fiberoptic oral intubation: the effect of model fidelity on training for transfer to patient care. Anesthesiology 2008;109:1007-13.
24. Sidhu RS, Park J, Brydges R, et al. Laboratory-based vascular anastomosis training: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of bench model fidelity and level of training on skill acquisition. J Vasc Surg 2007;45:343-9.
25. Clausner A, Wilson TD. Do students prefer stereoscopic lectures? Oral presentation at the American Association of Anatomists meeting as part of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology; 2008 April; San Diego, CA.
26. Corton MM, McIntire DD, Wai CY, et al. A comparison of an interactive computer-based method with a conventional reading approach for learning pelvic anatomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195:1438-43.