New urbanism and sprawl: A Toronto case study

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 233-248

  Skaburskis, Andrejs ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Analytic methods; Demand assessment; New Urbanism; Sprawl

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; HOUSING; URBAN MORPHOLOGY; URBANIZATION;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; ONTARIO; TORONTO;

EID: 33144488035     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X05278985     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alonso, William. 1964. Location and land use. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Blais, Pamela. 2000. Inching toward sustainability: The evolving urban structure of the Greater Toronto area. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto and Metropole Consultants.
3. Bookout, Lloyd W. 1992. Neotraditional town planning: The test of the marketplace. Urban Land 51: 12 - 17
4. Brown, Barbara, John Burton, and Anne Sweeney. 1998. Neighbors, households, and front porches. Environment and Behavior 30 (5): 579 - 600.
5. Brown, Barbara, and Vivian L. Cropper. 2001. New urbanism and standard suburban subdivisions: Evaluating psychological and social goals. Journal of the American Planning Association 67 (4): 412 - 417.
6. Bustard, Paula. 2003. A post-occupancy evaluation of the Cornell new urbanist community in Markham, Ontario. Unpublished thesis, School of Urban and Regional Planning, Queen's University at Kingston, Ontario.
7. Calthorp, Peter. 1993. The next American metropolis: Ecology, community and the American dream. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
8. Chang-Moo, I., and A. Kun-Hyuck. 2003. Is Kentlands better than Radburn? The American garden city and the new urbanist paradigm. Journal of the American Planning Association 69 (1): 50 - 71.
9. Clark, Colin. 1951. Urban population densities. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 114: 490 - 496.
10. Clawson, Marion, R. Burnell Held, and Charles Stoddard. 1960. Land for the future. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11. Crane, Randy. 1996. Cars and drivers in the new suburbs: Linking access to travel in neotraditional planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 62 (1): 51 - 65.
12. Danielsen, Karen A., Robert E. Lang, and William Fulton. 1999. Retracting suburbia: Smart growth and the future of housing. Housing Policy Debate 10 (3): 513 - 553.
13. Day, Linda L. 1999. Choosing a house: The relationship between dwelling type, perception of privacy, and residential satisfaction. Journal of Planning Education and Research 19 (3): 265 - 275.
14. Duany, Andres, and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk. 1992. The second coming of the American small town. Wilson Quarterly 16: 19 - 52.
15. Duany, Andres, Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, and J. Speck. 2000. Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream. New York: North Point Press.
16. Eppli, Mark J., and Charles C. Tu. 1999. Valuing the new urbanism: The impact of the new urbanism on prices of single family homes. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
17. Ewing, Reid. 1997. Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable? Journal of the American Planning Association 63 (1): 107 - 126.
18. Frank, Lawrence, Jonathan Levine, and J. Chapman. 2004. Transportation and land-use preferences and Atlanta residents' neighborhood choices - Implementing transit oriented development in the Atlanta region. Project CM-000-00(339)m O.I. 0000339, Georgia Regional Transportation Authority and Georgia Department of Transportation.
19. Gordon, David L. A., and Ken Tamminga. 2002. Large-scale traditional neighbourhood development and pre-emptive ecosystem planning: The Markham experience, 1989-2001. Journal of Urban Design 7 (3): 321 - 340.
20. Gordon, David L. A., and S. Vipond. 2005. Gross density and implementation of new urbanist plans in Markham, Ontario. Journal of the American Planning Association 71 (1): 41 - 55.
21. Grant, Jill. 2002. Mixing use in theory and practice: Canadian experience with implementing a planning principle. Journal of the American Planning Association 68 (1): 71 - 84.
22. Gyourko, Joseph E., and Witold Rybczynski. 2000. Financing new urbanist projects: Obstacles and solutions. Housing Policy Debate 11 (3): 733 - 750.
23. Hack, Garry, and Andrejs Skaburskis. 1992. Lessons from Canada's housing R&Dexperience. Environment and Planning C 10: 61 - 76.
24. Lee, Chang-Moo, and Barbara Stabin-Nesmith. 2001. The continuing value of a planned community: Radburn in the evolution of suburban development. Journal of Urban Design 6 (2): 151 - 184.
25. Lund, Hollie. 2003. Testing the claims of new urbanism: Local access, pedestrian travel, and neighboring behaviors. Journal of the American Planning Association 69 (4): 414 - 429.
26. McKenzie, Roderick Duncan. 1933. The metropolitan community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Michelson, William. 1977. Environmental choice, human behavior, and residential satisfaction. New York. Oxford University Press.
28. Muth, Richard. 1969. Cities and housing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Myers, Dowell, and E. Gearin. 2001. Current preferences and future demand for denser residential environments. Housing Policy Debate 12 (4): 633 - 659.
30. Myers, Dowell, and Allicia Kitsuse. 1999. The debate over future density of development: An interpretive review. Working Paper WP99DM1, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA.
31. Nasar, Jack L. 2003. Does neo-traditional development build community? Journal of Planning Education and Research 23: 58 - 68.
32. Ricardo, David. [1817] 1969. The principles of political economy and taxation. London: Everyman's Library, J. M. Dent.
33. Rybczynski, Witold. 1998. (Some) people like new urbanism. Wharton Real Estate Review 2: 49 - 53.
34. Schon, Donald A. 1967. Technology and change: The impact of invention and innovation on American social and economic development. New York: Delta.
35. Skaburskis, Andrejs. 1988. The nature of Canadian condominium submarkets and their effect on the evolving urban spatial structure. Urban Studies 25: 109 - 123.
36. Skaburskis, Andrejs. 1989. Inversions in urban density gradients: A brief look at the Vancouver metropolitan area's density profile. Urban Studies 26: 397 - 401.
37. Skaburskis, Andrejs. 1997. Gender differences in housing demand. Urban Studies 34 (2): 275 - 320.
38. Skaburskis, Andrejs. 1999. Modelling the choice of tenure and building type. Urban Studies 36 (13): 2199 - 2215.
39. Skaburskis, Andrejs, and H. Hack. 1993. Designing Alberta's contemplated housing R&D program. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 10 (1): 23 - 39.
40. Song, Yan, and Gerrit-Jan Knaap. 2003. New urbanism and housing values: A disaggregate assessment. Journal of Urban Economics 54: 218 - 238.
41. Steuteville, Rob. 2000. New urbanism and traditional neighborhood development: Comprehensive report and best practices guide. Ithaca, NY: New Urban News.
42. Talen, Emily. 1999. Sense of community and neighborhood form: An assessment of the social doctrine of new urbanism. Urban Studies 36 (8): 1361 - 1379.
43. Talen, Emily. 2001. Traditional urbanism meets residential affluence: An analysis of the variability of suburban preferences. Journal of the American Planning Association 67 (2): 199 - 216.
44. Talen, Emily. 2002. The social goals of new urbanism. Housing Policy Debate 13 (1): 165 - 188.
45. Tu, Charles C., and Mark J. Eppli. 1999. Valuing new urbanism: The case of Kentlands. Real Estate Economics 27 (3): 425 - 451.
46. Vipond S. 2000. A comparison of gross density: Conventional and new urbanism areas in suburban Markham, Ontario. Unpublished master's report, School of Urban and Regional Planning, Queen's University at Kingston, Ontario, Canada.