Can high-field MREIT be used to directly detect neural activity? Theoretical considerations

NeuroImage

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 205-216

  Sadleir, R J ^a   Grant, S C ^b   Woo, E J ^c  

^a J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering   (United States)

^b FAMU FSU COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING   (United States)

^c Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Aplysia; Bidomain; Finite element model; FMRI; Hodgkin Huxley model; MREIT

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL GANGLION; APLYSIA; ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE CONDUCTANCE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GILL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; NERVOUS TISSUE; NEUROMODULATION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; WITHDRAWAL REFLEX; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DEVICES; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; GANGLION; IMAGE QUALITY; MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NERVE CELL; PERITONEAL CAVITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REFLEX;

ABDOMINAL CAVITY; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; APLYSIA; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GANGLIA, INVERTEBRATE; GILLS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEMBRANE POTENTIALS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NEURONS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REFLEX;

EID: 77953289348     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Altman K.W., Plonsey R. Point source nerve bundle stimulation: effects of fiber diameter and depth on simulated excitation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1990, 37:688-698.
2. Bagshaw A.P., Liston A.D., Bayford R.H., Tizzard A., Gibson A.P., Tidswell T., Sparkes M.K., Deghani H., Binnie C.D., Holder D.S. Electrical impedance tomography of human brain function using reconstruction algorithms based on the finite element method. NeuroImage 2003, 20:752-764.
3. Bodurka J., Bandettini P.A. Toward direct mapping of neuronal activity: MRI detection of ultraweak, transient magnetic field changes. Magn. Reson. Med. 2002, 47:1052-1058.
4. Bodurka J., Jesmanowicz A., Hyde J.S., Xu H., Estkowski L., Li S.-J. Current-induced magnetic resonance phase imaging. J. Magn. Reson. 1999, 137:265-271.
5. Cassarà A.M., Hagberg G.E., Bianciardi M., Migliore M., Maraviglia B. Realistic simulations of neuronal activity: a contribution to the debate on direct detection of neuronal currents by MRI. NeuroImage 2008, 39:87-106.
6. Chu R., de Zwart J.A., van Gelderen P., Fukunaga M., Kellman P., Holroyd T., Duyn J.H. Hunting for neuronal currents: absence of rapid MRI signal changes during visual-evoked response. NeuroImage 2004, 23:1059-1067.
7. Ciobanu L., Webb A.G., Pennington C.H. Magnetic resonance imaging of biological cells. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2003, 42:69-93.
8. Falk C.X., Wu J.-Y., Cohen L.B., Tang A.C. Nonuniform expression of habituation in the activity of distinct classes of neurons in the aplysia abdominal ganglion. J. Neurosci. 1993, 13:4072-4081.
9. Foster K.R., Bidinger J.M., Carpenter D.O. The electrical resistivity of cytoplasm. Biophys. J. 1976, 16:991-1001.
10. Frazier W.T., Kandel E.R., Kupfermann I., Waziri R., Coggeshall R.E. Morphological and functional properties of identified neurons in the abdominal ganglion of Aplysia californica. J. Neurophysiol. 1967, 30:1288-1351.
11. Grant S.C., Aiken N.R., Plant H.D., Gibbs S., Mareci T.H., Webb A.G., Blackband S.J. NMR spectroscopy of single neurons. Magn. Reson. Med. 2000, 44:19-22.
12. Haacke E.M., Brown R.W., Thompson M.R., Venkatesan R. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design 1999, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.
13. Henriquez C.S. Simulating the electrical behavior of cardiac tissue using the bidomain model. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 1993, 21:1-77.
14. Hines M.L., Carnevale N.T. The NEURON simulation environment. Neural Comput. 1997, 9:1179-1209.
15. Kim H.J., Oh T.I., Kim Y.T., Lee B.I., Woo E.J., Seo J.K., Lee S.Y., Kwon O., Park C., Kang B.T., Park H.M. In vivo electrical conductivity imaging of a canine brain using a 3T MREIT system. Physiol. Meas. 2008, 29:1145-1155.
16. Kraus R.H., Volegov P., Matlachov A., Espy M. Toward direct neural current imaging by resonant mechanisms at ultra-low field. NeuroImage 2008, 39:310-317.
17. Kwon O., Woo E.J., Yoon J.R., Seo J.K. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): Simulation study of J-Substitution algorithm. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2002, 49:160-167.
18. Lee B.I., Lee S.H., Kim T.S., Kwon O., Woo E.J., Seo J.K. Harmonic decomposition in PDE-based denoising technique for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2005, 52:1912-1920.
19. Lee C.-O., Ahn S., Jeon K. Denoising of Bz data for conductivity reconstruction in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT). KAIST DMS BK21 Research Report Series, 09-16 2009.
20. Luo Q., Lu H., Senseman D., Worsley K., Yang Y., Gao J.-H. Physiologically evoked neuronal current MRI in a bloodless turtle brain: detectable or not?. NeuroImage 2009, 47:1268-1276.
21. Malmivuo J., Plonsey R. Bioelectromagnetism-Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields 1995, Oxford University Press, New York.
22. Mansfield P., Morris P.G. NMR Imaging in Biomedicine 1982, Academic Press, New York.
23. Minhas A.S., Woo E.J., Lee S.Y. Magnetic flux density measurement with balanced steady state free precession pulse sequence for MREIT: a simulation study. Proc. 31st Int. Conf. IEEE EMBS 2009, 2276-2278. IEEE Press, Minneapolis, USA.
24. Morris P.G. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in medicine and biology 1986, Oxford University Press, New York.
25. Oh S.H., Lee B.I., Woo E.J., Lee S.Y., Cho M.H., Kwon O., Seo J.K. Conductivity and current density image reconstruction using harmonic Bz algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. Phys. Med. Biol. 2003, 48:3101-3116.
26. Oh S.H., Lee B.I., Woo E.J., Lee S.Y., Kim T.S., Kwon O., Seo J.K. Electrical conductivity images of biological tissue phantoms in MREIT. Physiol. Meas. 2005, 26:S279-S288.
27. Park T.S., Lee S.Y. Effects of neuronal magnetic fields on MRI: numerical analysis with axon and dendrite models. NeuroImage 2007, 35:531-538.
28. Park T.S., Lee S.Y., Park J.-H., Cho M.H., Le S.Y. Observation of the fast response of a magnetic resonance signal to neuronal activity: a snail ganglia study. Physiol. Meas. 2006, 27:181-1990.
29. Park C., Lee B.I., Kwon O., Woo E.J. Measurement of induced magnetic flux density using injection current nonlinear encoding (ICNE) in MREIT. Physiol. Meas. 2007, 28:117-127.
30. Petridou N., Plenz D., Silva A.C., Loew M., Bodurka J., Bandettini P.A. Direct magnetic resonance detection of neuronal electrical activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103:16015-16020.
31. Purpura D.P., Mc Murtry J.G. Intracellular activities and evoked potential changes during polarization of motor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 1965, 28:166-185.
32. Reilly J.P. Applied Bioelectricity 1998, Springer-Verlag, New York.
33. Roth B.J., Altman K.W. Steady-state point-source stimulation of a nerve containing axons with an arbitrary distribution of diameters. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 1992, 30:103-108.
34. Sadleir R.J., Grant S.C., Zhang S.U., Lee B.I., Pyo H.C., Oh S.H., Park C., Woo E.J., Lee S.Y., Kwon O., Seo J.K. Noise analysis in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography at 3 and 11T field strengths. Physiol. Meas. 2005, 26:875-884.
35. Sadleir R.J., Grant S.C., DeMarse T.B., Woo E.J., Lee S.Y., Kim T.S., Oh S.H., Lee B.I., Seo J.K. MRIEIT/MEA compatibility at 17.6 Tesla. Int. J. Bioelectromag. 2005, 7:278-281.
36. Sadleir R.J., Grant S.C., Zhang S.U., Oh S.H., Lee B.I., Woo E.J. High field MREIT: setup and tissue phantom imaging at 11T. Physiol. Meas. 2006, 27:S261-S270.
37. Scott G.C., Joy M.L.G., Armstrong R.L., Henkelman R.M. Measurement of nonuniform current density by magnetic resonance. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 1991, 10:362-374.
38. Scott G.C., Joy M.L.G., Armstrong R.L., Henkelman R.M. Sensitivity of magnetic-resonance current-density imaging. J. Magn. Reson. 1992, 97:235-254.
39. Seo J.K., Yoon J.R., Woo E.J., Kwon O. Reconstruction of conductivity and current density images using only one component of magnetic field measurements. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2003, 50:1121-1124.
40. Tang L., Avison M.J., Gatenby J.C., Gore J.C. Failure to direct detect magnetic field dephasing corresponding to ERP generation. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008, 26:484-489.
41. Terzuolo C.A., Bullock T.H. Measurement of imposed voltage gradient adequate to modulate neuronal firing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1956, 42:687-694.
42. Tranquillo J.V., Burwell D.O., Henriquez C.S. Analytical model of extracellular potentials in a tissue slab with a finite bath. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2005, 52:334-338.
43. Trayanova N. Discrete versus syncytial tissue behavior in a model of cardiac stimulation-II: results of simulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1996, 43:1141-1150.
44. Truong T.-K., Avram A., Song A.W. Lorentz effect imaging of ionic currents in solution. J. Magn. Reson. 2008, 191:93-99.
45. Tung L. A bi-domain model for describing ischemic myocardial D-C potentials. Physics 1978, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
46. Woo E.J., Seo J.K. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for high-resolution conductivity imaging. Physiol. Meas. 2008, 29:R1-R26.
47. Xue Y., Gao J.-H., Xiong J. Direct MRI detection of neuronal magnetic fields in the brain: theoretical modeling. NeuroImage 2006, 31:550-559.
48. Zecevic D., Wu J.-Y., Cohen L.B., London J.A., Hopp H.-P., Falk C.X. Hundreds of neurons in the aplysia abdominal ganglion are active during the gill-withdrawal reflex. J. Neurosci. 1989, 9:3681-3689.
49. Zochowski M., Cohen L.B., Fuhrmann G., Kleinfeld D. Distributed and partially separate pools of neurons are correlated with two different components of the gill-withdrawal reflex in aplysia. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20:8485-8492.