Toward direct neural current imaging by resonant mechanisms at ultra-low field

NeuroImage

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 310-317

  Kraus Jr , R H ^a   Volegov, P ^a   Matlachov, A ^a   Espy, M ^a  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; BRAIN FUNCTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEMODYNAMICS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NERVE CONDUCTION; NEUROIMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MAGNETICS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL;

EID: 36048980917     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.058     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abragam A. Principles of Nuclear Magnetism (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England
2. Baillet S., Mosher J.C., Jerbi K., and Leahy R.M. Hybrid MEG Source Characterization by Cortical Remapping and Imaging of Parametric Source Models. Proc. 12th Intl Conf Biomagnetism, August 13-17, 2000 (2000), Helsinki, Finland
3. Bandettini P.A., Wong E.C., Hinks R.S., Tikofsky S., and Hyde J.S. Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation. Magn. Reson. Med. 25 (1992) 390-397
4. Bandettini, Petridou N., and Bodurka J. Direct detection of neuronal activity with MRI: fantasy, possibility, or reality?. Appl. Magn. Reson. 29 1 (2005) 65-88
5. Belliveau J.W., Kennedy D.N., McKiinstry R.C., et al. Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging. Science 254 (1991) 716-719
6. Bodurka J., and Bandettini P.A. Toward direct mapping of neuronal activity: MRI detection of ultra weak transient magnetic field changes. Mag. Reson. Med. 47 (2002) 1052-1058
7. Bodurka J., Jesmanowicz A., Hyde J.S., Xu H., Estkowski L., and Li S.-J. Current-induced magnetic resonance phase imaging. J. Magn. Reson. 137 (1999) 265-271
8. Burghoff M., Hartwig S., and Trahms L. Nuclear magnetic resonance in the nanotesla range. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 (2005) 054103
9. Espy M.A., Matlachov A.N., Volegov P.L., Mosher J.C., and Kraus Jr. R.H. SQUID-based simultaneous detection of NMR and biomagnetic signals at ultra-low magnetic fields. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 15 (2005) 635-639
10. Hämäläinen M., Hari R., Ilmoniemi J., Knuutila J., and Lounasmaa O.V. Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65 (1993) 413-497
11. Heller L., Ranken D., and Best E. The magnetic field inside special conducting geometries due to internal current. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engineering vol. 51 no. 8 (2004) August
12. Heller, L., Barrowes, B.E., George, J.S., submitted for publication. Modeling direct effects of neural current on MRI. Submitted to Hum. Brain Mapp.
13. Henrie J.A., and Shapley R. LFP power spectra in V1 cortex: the graded effect of stimulus contrast. J. Neurophysiol. 94 (2005) 479-490
14. Konn D., Gowland P., and Bowtell R. MRI detection of weak magnetic fields due to an extended current dipole in a conducting sphere: a model for direct detection of neuronal currents in the brain. Magn. Resn. Med. 50 (2003) 40-49
15. Leahy R.M., Mosher J.C., Spencer M.E., Huang M.X., and Lewine J.D. A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 107 (1998) 159-173
16. Logothetis N.K. The neural basis of the blood-oxygen-level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging signal. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B Biol. Sci. 357 (2002) 1003-1037
17. Logothetis N.K. The underpinnings of the BOLD functional magnetic resonance imaging signal. J. Neurosci. 23 10 (2003) 3963-3971
18. Logothetis N.K., and Pfeuffer J. On the nature of the BOLD fMRI contrast mechanism. MRI 22 (2004) 1517-1531
19. Matlachov A.N., Volegov P.L., Espy M.A., George J.S., and Kraus Jr. R.H. SQUID detected NMR in microtesla magnetic fields. J. Mag. Reson. 170 (2004) 1-7
20. McDermott R., Kelso N., Lee S.-K., et al. SQUID-detected magnetic resonance imaging in microtesla magnetic fields. J. Low Temp. Phys. 135 (2004) 793-821
21. Parkes L.M., de Lange F.P., Fries P., Toni I., and Norris D.G. Inability to directly detect magnetic field changes associated with neuronal activity. Magn. Reson. Med. 57 (2007) 411-416
22. Petridou N., Bodurka J., Loew M., and Bandettini P.A. Neuronal current imaging using MRI: a feasibility study. Proc. SPIE 4321 (2001) 189-194
23. Sutherling W.W., Akhtari M., Mamelak M., Mosher J., Arthur D., Sands S., Weiss P., Lopez N., DiMauro J., Flynn E., and Leahy R. Dipole localization of human induced focal afterdischarge seizure in simultaneous magnetoencephalography and electrocorticography. Brain Topogr. 14 (2001) 101-116
24. Truccolo W.A., Ding M., Knuth K.H., Nakamura R., and Bressler S.L. Trial-to-trial variability of cortical evoked responses: implications for the analysis of functional connectivity. Clin. Neurophysiol. 113 (2002) 206-226
25. Volegov P., Matlachov A.N., Espy M.A., George J.S., and Kraus Jr. R.H. Simultaneous magnetoencephalography and SQUID detected nuclear magnetic resonance in micro-tesla magnetic fields. Magn. Res. Med. 52 (2004) 467-470
26. Xiong J., Fox P.T., and Gao J.-H. Directly mapping magnetic field effects of neuronal activity by magnetic resonance imaging.". Hum. Brain Mapp. 20 (2003) 41-49
27. Xue Y., Gao J.-H., and Xiong J. Direct MRI detection of neuronal magnetic fields in the brain: theoretical modeling. NeuroImage 31 (2006) 550-559
28. Zotev V., Matlachov A., Volegov P., Sandin H., Espy M., Mosher J., Urbaitis A., Newman S., and Kraus R. Multi-sensor system for simultaneous ultra-low field MRI and MEG. Int. Congr. Ser. 1300 (2007) 631-634