Mapping genomic targets of DNA helicases by chromatin immunoprecipitation in saccharomyces cerevisiae

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 587, Issue , 2010, Pages 113-126

  Cobb, Jennifer ^a   Van Attikum, Haico ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP); DNA helicases; DNA repair; DNA replication; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Indexed keywords

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

DNA; HELICASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ANIMALS; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; DNA; DNA HELICASES; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 77953015449     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60327-355-8_8     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Gribun A., Cheung K. L., Huen J., Ortega J., and Houry W. A. (2008) Yeast Rvb1 and Rvb2 are ATP-dependent DNA helicases that form a heterohexameric complex. J. Mol. Biol. 376, 1320-1333.
2. Shen X., Mizuguchi G., Hamiche A., and Wu C. (2000) A chromatin remodelling complex involved in transcription and DNA processing. Nature 406, 541-544. (Pubitemid 30625741)
3. Mizuguchi G., Shen X., Landry J., Wu W. H., Sen S., and Wu C. (2004) ATPdriven exchange of histone H2AZ variant catalyzed by SWR1 chromatin remodeling complex. Science 303, 343-348. (Pubitemid 38095768)
4. Krogan N. J., Keogh M. C., Datta N., et al. (2003) A Snf2 family ATPase complex required for recruitment of the histone H2A variant Htz1. Mol. Cell. 12, 1565-1576. (Pubitemid 38037023)
5. Kobor M. S., Venkatasubrahmanyam S., Meneghini M. D., et al. (2004) A protein complex containing the conserved Swi2/ Snf2-related ATPase Swr1p deposits histone variant H2A.Z into euchromatin. PLoS Biol. 2, E131.
6. van Attikum H., Fritsch O., Hohn B., and Gasser S. M. (2004) Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 119, 777-788. (Pubitemid 40017685)
7. Morrison A. J., Highland J., Krogan N. J., et al. (2004) INO80 and gamma-H2AX interaction links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling to DNA damage repair. Cell 119, 767-775. (Pubitemid 40017684)
8. van Attikum H., Fritsch O., and Gasser S. M. (2007) Distinct roles for SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodeling complexes at chromosomal double-strand breaks. EMBO J. 26, 4113-4125. (Pubitemid 47462094)
9. Shimada K., Oma Y., Schleker T., et al. (2008) Ino80 chromatin remodeling complex promotes recovery of stalled replication forks. Curr. Biol. 18, 566-575.
10. Papamichos-Chronakis M., and Peterson C. L. (2008) The Ino80 chromatin-remodeling enzyme regulates replisome function and stability. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 338-345. (Pubitemid 351483399)
11. Jonsson Z. O., Jha S., Wohlschlegel J. A., and Dutta A. (2004) Rvb1p/Rvb2p recruit Arp5p and assemble a functional Ino80 chromatin remodeling complex. Mol. Cell. 16, 465-477. (Pubitemid 39504799)
12. Biswas-Fiss E. E., Khopde S. M., and Biswas S. B. (2005) The Mcm467 complex of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is preferentially activated by autonomously replicating DNA sequences. Biochemistry 44, 2916-2925. (Pubitemid 40293666)
13. Davey M. J., Indiani C., and O'Donnell M. (2003) Reconstitution of the Mcm2-7p heterohexamer, subunit arrangement, and ATP site architecture. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 4491-4499. (Pubitemid 36800944)
14. Maiorano D., Lutzmann M., and Mechali M. (2006) MCM proteins and DNA replication. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 18, 130-136. (Pubitemid 43375879)
15. Aparicio O. M., Weinstein D. M., and Bell S. P. (1997) Components and dynamics of DNA replication complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: redistribution ofMCMproteins and Cdc45p during S phase. Cell 91, 59-69. (Pubitemid 27431313)
16. Cobb J. A., Bjergbaek L., Shimada K., Frei C., and Gasser S. M. (2003) DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1. EMBO J. 22, 4325-4336. (Pubitemid 37021759)
17. Bjergbaek L., Cobb J. A., Tsai-Pflugfelder M., and Gasser S. M. (2005) Mechanistically distinct roles for Sgs1p in checkpoint activation and replication fork maintenance. EMBO J. 24, 405-417. (Pubitemid 40216144)
18. Cobb J. A., Schleker T., Rojas V., Bjergbaek L., Tercero J. A., and Gasser S. M. (2005) Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations. Genes Dev. 19, 3055-3069. (Pubitemid 41798120)
19. Lee S. E., Moore J. K., Holmes A., Umezu K., Kolodner R. D., and Haber J. E. (1998) Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/ M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 94, 399-409. (Pubitemid 28376083)
20. Dubrana K., van Attikum H., Hediger F., and Gasser S. M. (2007) The processing of double-strand breaks and binding of single-strand-binding proteins RPA and Rad51 modulate the formation of ATRkinase foci in yeast. J. Cell. Sci. 120, 4209-4220.
21. van Werven F. J., and Timmers H. T. (2006) The use of biotin tagging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves the sensitivity of chromatin immunoprecipitation. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, e33.