Reinforcing efficacy of fat, as assessed by progressive ratio responding, depends upon availability not amount consumed

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 100, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 316-321

  Wojnicki, F H E ^a   Babbs, R K ^b   Corwin, R L W ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Binge eating; Dietary fat; Progressive ratio; Reinforcing efficacy

Indexed keywords

WATER; FAT INTAKE;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL HOUSING; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FAT INTAKE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FLUID INTAKE; FOOD AVAILABILITY; FOOD DEPRIVATION; MALE; NONHUMAN; PORTION SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAINING; ADMINISTRATION AND DOSAGE; ANIMAL; BULIMIA; CHEMICALLY INDUCED; DRUG ADMINISTRATION; DRUG EFFECTS; EATING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BULIMIA; DIETARY FATS; DRUG ADMINISTRATION SCHEDULE; EATING; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; MALE; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 77952956840     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Corwin R.L. Binge-type, eating induced by limited access in rats does not require energy restriction on the previous day. Appetite 2004, 42:139-142.
2. Corwin R.L., Wojnicki F.H.E., Fisher J.O., Dimitriou S.G., Rice H.B., Young M.A. Limited access to a dietary fat option affects ingestive behavior but not body composition in male rats. Physiol Behav 1998, 65:545-553.
3. Davis J.F., Melhorn S.J., Shurdan J.D., Heiman J.U., Tschop M.H., Clegg D.J., et al. Comparison of hydrogenated vegetable shortening and nutritionally complete high-fat diet on limited access-binge behavior in rats. Physiol Behav 2007, 92:924-930.
4. Thomas M.A., Rice H.B., Weinstock D., Corwin R.L. Effects of aging on food intake and body composition in rats. Physiol Behav 2002, 76:487-500.
5. Dimitriou S.G., Rice H.B., Corwin R.L. Effects of limited access to a fat option on food intake and body composition in female rats. Int J Eat Disord 2000, 28:436-445.
6. Wojnicki F.H.E., Charny G., Corwin R.L. Binge-type behavior in rats consuming trans-fat-free shortening. Physiol Behav 2008, 94:627-629.
7. Wojnicki F.H.E., Johnson D.S., Corwin R.L.W. Access conditions affect binge-type shortening consumption in rats. Physiol Behav 2008, 95:649-657.
8. Avena N.M., Rada P., Hoebel B.G. Evidence for sugar addiction: behavioral and neurochemical effects of intermittent, excessive sugar intake. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2008, 32:20-39.
9. Wojnicki F.H.E., Stine J.G., Corwin R.L.W. Liquid sucrose bingeing in rats depends on the access schedule, concentration, and delivery system. Physiol Behav 2007, 92:566-574.
10. Wong K.J., Wojnicki F.H.E., Corwin R.L.W. Baclofen, raclopride, and naltrexone differentially affect intake of fat/sucrose mixtures under limited access conditions. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2009, 92:528-536.
11. Yoneda T., Taka Y., Okamura M., Mizushige T., Matsumura S., Manabe Y., et al. Reinforcing effect for corn oil stimulus was concentration dependent in an operant task in mice. Life Sci 2007, 81:1585-1592.
12. Ward S.J., Dykstra L.A. The role of CB1 receptors in sweet versus fat reinforcement: effect of CB1 receptor deletion, CB1 receptor antagonism (SR141716A) and CB1 receptor agonist (CP-55940). Behav Pharmacol 2005, 16:381-388.
13. Brennan K., Roberts D.C.S., Anisman H., Merali Z. Individual differences in sucrose consumption in the rat: motivational and neurochemical correlates of hedonia. Psychopharmacology 2001, 157:269-276.
14. Cheeta S., Brook S., Wilner P. Effects of reinforcer sweetness and the D2/D3 antagonist raclopride on progressive ratio operant performance. Behav Pharmacol 1995, 6:127-132.
15. Hodos W. Progressive ratio as a measure of reward strength. Science 1961, 34:943-944.
16. Reilly S. Reinforcement value of gustatory stimuli determined by progressive ratio performance. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1999, 63(2):301-311.
17. Sclafani A., Ackroff K. Reinforcement value of sucrose measured by progressive ratio operant licking in the rat. Physiol Behav 2003, 79:663-670.
18. McGregor I.S., Saharov T., Hunt G.E., Topple A.N. Beer consumption in rats: the influence of ethanol content, food deprivation, and cocaine. Alcohol 1999, 17:47-56.
19. Hodos W., Kalman G. Effects of increment size and reinforcer volume on progressive ratio performance. J Exp Anal Behav 1963, 6(3):387-392.
20. Wojnicki F.H.E., Roberts D.C.S., Corwin R.L.W. Effects of baclofen on operant performance for food pellets and vegetable shortening after a history of binge-type behavior in non-food deprived rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2006, 84:197-206.
21. Brebner K., Phelan R., Roberts D.C.S. Effect of baclofen on cocaine self administration in rats reinforced under fixed-ratio 1 and progressive ratio schedules. Psychopharmacology 2000, 148:314-321.
22. Brebner K., Phelan R., Roberts D.C.S. Intra-VTA baclofen attenuates cocaine self-administration on a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2000, 66:857-862.
23. Mobini S., Chiang T.J., Ho M.Y., Bradshaw C.M., Szabadi E. Comparison of the effects of clozapione, haloperidol, chlorpromazine, and d-amphetamine on performance on time-constrained progressive ratio schedule on a locomotor behaviour in the rat. Psychopharmacology 2000, 152:47-54.
24. Roberts D.C.S., Andrews M.M., Vickers G.J. Baclofen attenuates the reinforcing effects of cocaine in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 1996, 15(4):417-423.
25. Buda-Levin A., Wojnicki F.H.E., Corwin R.L. Baclofen reduces fat intake under binge-type conditions. Physiol Behav 2005, 86:176-184.
26. Diagnostic and statistical manual-IV-text revision 2000, APA (American Psychiatric Association)., American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC.
27. Richardson N.R., Roberts D.C.S. Progressive ratio schedules in drug self-administration studies in rats: a method to evaluate reinforcing efficacy. J Neurosci Methods 1996, 66:1-11.
28. Michael J. Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav 1982, 57(1):149-155.
29. Goldiamond I. The blue books: Goldiamond & Thompson's functional analysis of behavior 2004, Cambridge Center for Behavior Analysis. Andronis (Ed.).
30. Deroche-Gamonet V., Belin D., Piazza V. Evidence for addiction-like behavior in the rat. Science 2004, 305:1014-1017.
31. Bulik C.M., Brinded E.C. The effect of food deprivation on the reinforcing value of food and smoking in bulimic and control women. Physiol Behav 1994, 55(4):665-672.
32. Davis C., Levitan R.D., Kaplan A.S., Carter J., Reid C., Curtis C., et al. Reward sensitivity and the D2 dopamine receptor gene: a case-control study of binge eating disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2008, 32:620-628.
33. Davis C., Levitan R.D., Carter J., Kaplan A.S., Reid C., Curtis C., et al. Personality and eating behaviors: a case-control study of binge eating disorder. Int J Eat Disord 2008, 41:243-250.
34. Schienle A., Schäfer A., Hermann A., Vaitl D. Binge-eating disorder: reward sensitivity and brain activation to images of food. Biol Psychiatry Apr 15, 2009, 65(8):654-661.
35. Davis C.A., Levitan R.D., Reid C., Carter J.C., Kaplan A.S., Patte K.A., et al. Dopamine for "wanting" and opioids for "liking": a comparison of obese adults with and without binge eating. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009, 17:1220-1225.
36. Kirkley B.G., Burge J.C., Ammerman A. Dietary restraint, binge eating, and dietary behavior patterns. Int J Eat Dis 1988, 7:771-778.
37. Fiorillo C.D., Tobler P.N., Schultz W. Discrete coding of reward probability and uncertainty by dopamine neurons. Science 2003, 299:1898-1902.
38. Schlösser R.G., Nenadic I., Wagner G., Zysset S., Koch K., Sauer H. Dopaminergic modulation of brain systems subserving decision making under uncertainty: a study with fMRI and methylphenidate challenge. Synapse 2009, 63:429-442.
39. Marsh R., Steinglass J.E., Gerber A.J., Graziano-O'Leary K., Wang Z., Murphy D., et al. Deficient activity in the neural systems that mediate self-regulatory control in bulimia nervosa. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2009, 66:51-63.
40. Corwin R.L., Wojnicki F.H. Baclofen, raclopride, and naltrexone differentially affect intake of fat and sucrose under limited access conditions. Behav Pharmacol 2009, 20:537-548.
41. Rao R.E., Wojnicki F.H.E., Coupland J., Ghosh S., Corwin R.L.W. Baclofen, raclopride, and naltrexone differentially reduce solid fat emulsion intake under limited access conditions. Pharm Biochem Behav 2008, 89:581-590.